Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 57 of 107, unchanged
1 category · Named, not rankedRaindrop Systems
1Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
1 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Raindrop Systems was named 1 time in Supplier management, where Precoro led with 14%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market63 of 111
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In supplier management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Raindrop Systems for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier management | Spend and procurement | 0% | 63 of 111 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Precoro at 14% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Raindrop Systems held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Supplier management · by segment
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier management | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 63 of 111, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Raindrop Systems across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Raindrop Systems across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative1 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If speed and cost are key, consider Raindrop or similar low-cost, rapid-deployment platforms.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Supplier management · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Raindrop Systems, over the 1 answer that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Raindrop Systems was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Raindrop Systems, over the 1 answer that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Raindrop Systems was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Raindrop Systems. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 1 answers that named Raindrop Systems and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
caddi.com1
colab91.com1
deposco.com1
elitemindz.co1
guideflow.com1
mindsprint.com1
raindrop.comYour site1
softwareadvice.com1
softwareconnect.com1
softwaresuggest.com1
Nine of the ten domain citations in answers naming Raindrop Systems came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on raindrop.com
826
subdomains included
Content
307
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
39 · 4
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 280 | 16 | 2026-09-21 | ||
| Comparison | 13 | 1 | 2026-08-03 | ||
| Case study | 11 | 0 | 2026-06-25 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | 0 | 2026-05-20 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-21Raindrop makes waves in the hackett group fall 2026 solutionmap blog
- 2026-09-14What features should you look for in a source to pay solution blog
- 2026-09-02What are the key benefits of using an ai powered spend management platform blog
- 2026-08-19Governance isnt a feature its a relationship blog
- 2026-08-19Tail spend management why the last 20 of spend deserves the same rigor as the first 80 blog
- 2026-08-12Deploy ai agents in procurement a roadmap to success blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page raindrop.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Raindrop Systems
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Raindrop Systems is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Raindrop Systems is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI-Native Source-to-Pay Platform
- For
- Procurement, Finance, Legal, and Business Users
- Price stated
- preferred pricing and cooperative agreements raindrop.com/company/partners
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type IISOC 2 Compliance
- Customers named
- World MarketWorkwear OutfittersCordisLloyd’s RegisterLands’ EndJazeera Airways
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting
What Raindrop Systems's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: raindrop.com, raindrop.com/security, raindrop.com/solutions, raindrop.com/resources/case-studies, raindrop.com/company/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Raindrop Systems's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Raindrop Systems, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Raindrop Systems by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Raindrop Systems is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Raindrop Systems, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.