Every category where a model named Rapyd for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Payment orchestration platforms	Receivables and billing	0%	25 of 81	17%	6	under 10 labels · led by BlueSnap at 18%
Cross-border payments and FX	Treasury and cash	0%	22 of 87	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Wise Business at 39%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Embedded payments platforms	Receivables and billing	0%	74 of 110	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Stripe Connect at 53%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Rapyd yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Rapyd across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	4	1	5
Mistral Small	1	1	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	2	0	0	2
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct8 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative12 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative32 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you are expanding globally and need local payment methods immediately: Choose Rapyd or Adyen.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Payment orchestration · comparative prompt · alternative

“Rapyd is also strong here, specifically if you need local payment methods” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Payment orchestration · direct prompt · alternative

“Best for: Breadth of payout methods.” Mistral Small · Cross-border payments · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Handles scale without enterprise bloat (unlike Adyen or Rapyd's full stacks)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Payment orchestration · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Rapyd, over the 32 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Rapyd was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Adyen18 of 322Not among the top eight

Airwallex14 of 3210Not among the top eight

Stripe13 of 321Not among the top eight

Spreedly11 of 322Not among the top eight

Primer10 of 324Not among the top eight

Wise Business10 of 321Not among the top eight

Checkout.com10 of 320Not among the top eight

Payoneer8 of 320Not among the top eight

Stripe Connect7 of 323Not among the top eight

Nium7 of 320Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Rapyd. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 32 of the 32 answers that named Rapyd and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com25

walletinvestor.com17

whop.com17

airwallex.com12

connectpay.com9

highradius.com9

worldmetrics.org9

ilounge.com8

paymend.com8

rapyd.netYour site8

114 of the 122 domain citations in answers naming Rapyd came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/payment-orchestration-software14

ilounge.com/articles/10-best-payment-orchestration-platforms-in-20268

paymend.com/blog/15-payment-orchestration-platforms-by-category8

theindustryleaders.org/post/10-best-b2b-cross-border-payment-solutions-ranked-and-reviewed8

airwallex.com/en-us/blog/cross-border-payment-services-solutions7

devopsschool.com/blog/top-10-payment-orchestration-platforms-features-pros-cons-comparison7

guideflow.com/blog/cross-border-payments-software7

highradius.com/resources/Blog/best-cross-border-payment-platforms7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

rapyd.net is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Rapyd takes 0% of first choices and BlueSnap takes 18%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “payment orchestration platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “payment orchestration platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 1,000 a month (“rapyd”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 42 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 14,132 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 3,375 · 344 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 4,421
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 25 of 81 in payment orchestration

Segment leader

18%

BlueSnap

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 32 answers
Its own site cited: in 32 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on rapyd.net

5,470

subdomains included

Content

1,220

counted in the table below

Documentation

2,272

Product · Integration

48 · 13

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest
Blog	754	10	2026-09-22
News or press	176	4	2026-09-27
Glossary or explainer	92	0	2025-10-31
Podcast or video	66	1	2026-07-19
Comparison	47	0	2025-09-26
Report or ebook	34	1	2026-09-08
Case study	21	0	2025-08-18
Webinar or virtual event	17	0	2026-04-26
Conference or event	12	0	2023-06-21
Template or tool	1	undated

Most recent

2026-09-27Arik shtilman top 100 fintech leaders news or press
2026-09-22Corporate treasury tool blog
2026-09-22William nejo scale business blog
2026-09-22Rapyd decoded portal views partitioned reports ai docs blog
2026-09-15Payment processing costs blog
2026-09-15Checkout conversion benchmarks blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page rapyd.net exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Rapyd

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Rapyd is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: The Global Fintech Platform for Every Business
rapyd.net
For: Every Business
rapyd.net
Price stated: Pricing rapyd.net/platform
Customers named: ALCASTONGOTRADEKADMOSLITTLEPAYFlatpayVP SolutionsNextGenPaybyrd
Not stated on the pages read: Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Rapyd's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: rapyd.net, rapyd.net/is/compliance, rapyd.net/platform, rapyd.net/resources/case-studies, rapyd.net/company/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Rapyd's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Rapyd, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Rapyd by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Rapyd is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Rapyd, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.