| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cross-border payments and FX | Treasury and cash | 2% | 8 of 87 | 9% | 33 | accepted challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| B2B payment acceptance | Receivables and billing | 0% | 46 of 94 | 29% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Versapay at 19% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cross-border payments | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 13 → 8 of 87 |
| B2B payment acceptance | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 20 → 46 of 94 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“For absolute lowest cost with a limited budget, Payoneer edges out slightly” Kimi K2 · Cross-border payments · budget prompt · first choice
“Payoneer is strong for companies that receive international client payments and pay suppliers/contractors across many countries” GPT-5.4 mini · Cross-border payments · direct prompt · alternative
“Opening a Payoneer account typically does not require a monthly subscription fee, making it a good free-to-start option.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Cross-border payments · budget prompt · alternative
“Best For: Freelancers and digital creators in emerging markets, and marketplaces managing automated mass payouts.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Cross-border payments · comparative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Has 934+ complaints with the BBB over three years... Unexplained account terminations or freezes” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Cross-border payments · negative prompt · soft negative
“Who to be cautious with: Payoneer, Skrill, Airwallex (for very simple setups).” Qwen 3.7 Flash · B2B payment acceptance · negative prompt · soft negative
“It can be useful, but fee structures can be less attractive for some use cases.” GPT-5.4 mini · Cross-border payments · budget prompt · soft negative
“be aware of higher currency conversion fees compared to Wise” MiniMax M2.5 · Cross-border payments · budget prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 116 of the 122 answers that named Payoneer and are not a share of its labels.
421 of the 460 domain citations in answers naming Payoneer came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 2,074 | undated | |||
| Case study | 242 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 51 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 44 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 43 | undated | |||
| News or press | 23 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 5 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 3 | undated |
Every page payoneer.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Payoneer's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: payoneer.com, payoneer.com/about/pricing, payoneer.com/marketplace. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Payoneer's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Payoneer, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Payoneer by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: