Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 8 → 26 of 79
2 categories · Named, not rankedReach Reporting
11Judge labels
0First choices
3Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Reach Reporting was named 6 times in FP&A platforms and 1 other category, where Planful led with 20%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business27 of 80
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market23 of 74
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In fp&a platforms · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Reach Reporting for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FP&A platforms | Planning and analysis | 0% | 23 of 74 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Planful at 20% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Cash flow forecasting | Treasury and cash | 0% | 99 of 101 | 100% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Agicap at 13% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Reach Reporting held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · FP&A platforms · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 20 → 24 of 73
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FP&A platforms | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 20 → 23 of 74 |
| Cash flow forecasting | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 99 of 101, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Reach Reporting across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Reach Reporting across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained8 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“are highlighted as SMB-friendly tools, typically costing between $50 and $500 per month” Mistral Small · FP&A platforms · budget prompt · alternative
“Visual dashboards, customizable reports, forecasting; strong for accounting firms/SMBs” Grok 4.1 Fast · FP&A platforms · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Reporting Platforms Masquerading as Forecasting Tools (e.g., Fathom, Reach Reporting, Spotlight Reporting, LiveFlow)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Cash flow forecasting · negative prompt · soft negative
“Tools to Be Cautious About: Management Reporting Platforms (Fathom, Reach Reporting, Spotlight Reporting, LiveFlow)” Mistral Small · Cash flow forecasting · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Reach Reporting, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Reach Reporting was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Reach Reporting, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Reach Reporting was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Reach Reporting. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 11 answers that named Reach Reporting and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
clockwork.ai11
g2.com7
golimelight.com7
resources.rework.com7
drivetrain.ai6
learn.g2.com5
qobra.co4
thefinanceweekly.com4
wise.com4
centage.com3
Fifty-eight of the fifty-eight domain citations in answers naming Reach Reporting came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
reachreporting.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Reach Reporting takes 0% of first choices and Planful takes 20%.ShowHide
Search and answers
reachreporting.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Reach Reporting takes 0% of first choices and Planful takes 20%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “fp&a software”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “fp&a platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,600 a month (“reach reporting”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 20 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 7,627 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,711 · 96 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 632
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 42 clicks and $1,254 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 23 of 74 in FP&A platforms
Segment leader
20%
Planful
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 11 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 11 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on reachreporting.com
507
subdomains included
Content
395
counted in the table below
Documentation
2
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 344 | 4 | 2026-09-18 | Financial reporting, Financial consolidation | |
| Case study | 16 | 0 | 2025-04-17 | ||
| Comparison | 16 | 4 | 2026-07-09 | ||
| Conference or event | 9 | 1 | 2026-07-09 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | 0 | 2024-05-07 | ||
| News or press | 3 | 2 | 2026-07-13 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 2 | 0 | 2026-05-11 | ||
| Report or ebook | 1 | 1 | 2026-07-02 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | 0 | 2025-10-14 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-18Why budgeting and forecasting is so hard blog
- 2026-09-11The best financial reporting software for 2026 and beyond blog
- 2026-09-08How to choose financial reporting software blog
- 2026-08-10Your clients dont need more numbers blog
- 2026-07-13Newsletter demo scheduler news or press
- 2026-07-13Newsletter demo confirmation news or press
Events in person
Last twelve months
- March 18, 2026 to March 19, 2026Accounting & Business Expo 2026International Convention Centre, Sydney, Australia · exhibited
As the event pages on reachreporting.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page reachreporting.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Reach Reporting
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Reach Reporting is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Reach Reporting is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Automated financial reporting and planning software built for financial leaders to turn data into clear, actionable insights in just a few clicks - saving hours through automation.
- For
- financial professionals
- Price stated
- Transparent pricing reachreporting.com
- Starting price
- 149 reachreporting.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- 30-day free trial. No credit card required. reachreporting.com
- Integrations claimed
- 7 reachreporting.com/pricing
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type 2 complianceISO 27001SOC 1 and SOC 2/SSAE 16/ISAE 3402PCI Level 1FISMA ModerateSarbanes-Oxley (SOX)SOC 2 Type 1SOC 2 Type 2
- Customers named
- Momentum AccountingPivot Business GroupKynLi ConsultingBrainBoxCloud AccountantSummit Virtual CFO by AndersProvenCFOGenesis
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What Reach Reporting's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: reachreporting.com, reachreporting.com/pricing, reachreporting.com/security, reachreporting.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Reach Reporting's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Reach Reporting, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Reach Reporting by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Reach Reporting is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Reach Reporting, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.