Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 72 of 88, unchanged
2 categories · Named, not rankedSAP Cloud ERP
15Judge labels
0First choices
3Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. SAP Cloud ERP was named 2 times in Financial close manageme and 1 other category, where FloQast led with 55%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business75 of 92
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market60 of 85
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise13 of 75
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
In financial close manageme · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named SAP Cloud ERP for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial close management | Accounting and close | 0% | 60 of 85 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 55% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Professional services automation | Receivables and billing | 0% | 67 of 99 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by BigTime at 29% |
Movement
Since September 2026, SAP Cloud ERP held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Financial close manageme · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 30 → 55 of 77
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 14 → 13 of 71
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial close manageme | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 30 → 60 of 85 |
| PSA | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 67 of 99, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated SAP Cloud ERP across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated SAP Cloud ERP across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SAP Cloud ERP, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SAP Cloud ERP was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SAP Cloud ERP, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SAP Cloud ERP was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SAP Cloud ERP. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 15 answers that named SAP Cloud ERP and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
g2.com11
learn.g2.com9
guideflow.com6
numeric.io4
bluecopa.com3
kantata.com3
sap.comYour site3
softwareadvice.com3
accelo.com2
aicostadvisory.com2
Forty-three of the forty-six domain citations in answers naming SAP Cloud ERP came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
sap.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, SAP Cloud ERP takes 0% of first choices and FloQast takes 55%.ShowHide
Search and answers
sap.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, SAP Cloud ERP takes 0% of first choices and FloQast takes 55%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “close management tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “financial close management software”
–
not in the top ten
- Organic visits to its site
- about 2,214,514 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 117,113 · 18,594 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 113,777
- Paid Google search
- 5 searches its ads show for, about 68 clicks and $1,251 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 60 of 85 in financial close manageme
Segment leader
55%
FloQast
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 15 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 15 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on sap.com
20,663
subdomains included
Content
2,976
counted in the table below
Documentation
1,426
Product · Integration
1,660 · 3,500
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News or press | 1,797 | 92 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Blog | 677 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 183 | 0 | 2023-08-01 | ||
| Conference or event | 146 | 0 | 2026-05-01 | ||
| Report or ebook | 98 | 0 | 2025-04-01 | ||
| Case study | 29 | 0 | 2023-10-01 | ||
| Comparison | 21 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 13 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 10 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 2 | 1 | 2026-09-24 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Submissions officially open 2027 sap innovation awards news or press
- 2026-09-28Coming soon customer influence feedback experience news or press
- 2026-09-28Sap nvidia openshell auditable ai agents enterprise systems news or press
- 2026-09-28Sap connect 2026 media analyst program news or press
- 2026-09-24Sap apphaus network partner bluestonex builds the bridge news or press
- 2026-09-24Autonomous enterprise podcast lesssons 16 executive conversations podcast or video
Events in person
Upcoming
- April 6, 2027 to April 8, 2027SAP ALM Summit North America 2027SAP America, Inc., Newtown Square, United States · hosts
As the event pages on sap.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page sap.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as SAP Cloud ERP
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SAP Cloud ERP; a claim can dispute any of them.
SAP Cloud ERP (SAP S/4HANA Cloud) 1SAP Cloud ERP / SAP Close 1
Follow SAP Cloud ERP
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
SAP Cloud ERP is its own company.ShowHide
The company
SAP Cloud ERP is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- a foundational step on the path to the Autonomous Enterprise
- For
- SAP Cloud ERP Private customers
- Price stated
- included at no additional cost sap.com/blogs/new-transformation-preparation-service-for-sap-cloud-erp-private
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What SAP Cloud ERP's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: sap.com/blogs/new-transformation-preparation-service-for-sap-cloud-erp-private. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SAP Cloud ERP's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SAP Cloud ERP, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SAP Cloud ERP by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where SAP Cloud ERP is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name SAP Cloud ERP, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.