Small businessgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsNot ranked
1 category · Named, not rankedSINGOA
2Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
1 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. SINGOA was named 2 times in Cash application, where Versapay led with 9%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market40 of 83
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In cash application · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named SINGOA for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash application | Receivables and billing | 0% | 40 of 83 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Versapay at 9% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, SINGOA held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Cash application · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 34 → 36 of 79
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash application | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 34 → 40 of 83 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated SINGOA across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated SINGOA across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Reports 99.2% straight-through processing in 2\u20134 weeks, priced at $1\u2013$3 per invoice” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Cash application · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SINGOA, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SINGOA was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SINGOA, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SINGOA was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SINGOA. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named SINGOA and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
bluecopa.com2
emagia.com2
gaviti.com2
highradius.com2
singoa.comYour site2
stuut.ai2
agentcollect.com1
alltopbusiness.com1
cashbook.com1
cashflowpick.com1
Fourteen of the sixteen domain citations in answers naming SINGOA came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on singoa.com
73
subdomains included
Content
35
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 30 | 3 | 2026-07-05 | Cash application | |
| Comparison | 4 | 2 | 2026-07-08 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | 0 | 2026-05-03 | Accounts receivable auto |
Most recent
- 2026-07-08Singoa vs billtrust 2026 comparison
- 2026-07-06Ai vs rule based ar automation comparison
- 2026-07-05Wholesale distribution ar deductions chargebacks blog
- 2026-07-03Freight billing software carrier broker ar automation blog
- 2026-07-01Saas subscription billing dunning asc 606 guide blog
- 2026-06-29Professional services billing wip retainers time tracking blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page singoa.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow SINGOA
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
SINGOA is its own company.ShowHide
The company
SINGOA is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI-powered accounts receivable automation platform that helps businesses across every industry collect payments faster and reduce AR costs from $15-18 to $1-3 per invoice.
- For
- businesses across every industry
- Price stated
- Simple per-invoice pricing from $1-3. Volume discounts. 14-day free trial. No setup fees, no contracts. singoa.com/pricing
- Starting price
- 1 singoa.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- 14-day free trial; no credit card required singoa.com
- Integrations claimed
- 50 singoa.com/pricing · 2 singoa.com/partners pages disagree
- Certifications
- HIPAA CompliantSOC 2GDPRPIPEDA CompliantGDPR Ready
- Hosting
- United States
- Customers named
- AACME CORPGlobexInitechSoylent CorpUmbrella
What SINGOA's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: singoa.com, singoa.com/pricing, singoa.com/security, singoa.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SINGOA's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SINGOA, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SINGOA by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where SINGOA is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name SINGOA, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.