Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 22 → 19 of 80
1 category · Named, not rankedSnipe-IT
16Judge labels
0First choices
4Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
7 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Snipe-IT was named 7 times in Fixed asset accounting, where Sage Fixed Assets led with 34%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business18 of 81
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market23 of 107
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise103 of 109
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In fixed asset accounting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Snipe-IT for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed asset accounting | Accounting and close | 0% | 23 of 107 | 14% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Fixed Assets at 34% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Snipe-IT held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Fixed asset accounting · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 29 → 18 of 104
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 75 → 98 of 104
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed asset accounting | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 29 → 23 of 107 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Snipe-IT across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Snipe-IT across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained8 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Snipe-IT is a powerful, globally recognized open-source tool” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Fixed asset accounting · budget prompt · alternative
“Strong free alternative: Snipe-IT (open-source)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Fixed asset accounting · budget prompt · alternative
“Snipe-IT — Best Open Source / Free Option” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Fixed asset accounting · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“it's aimed primarily at IT asset management. Verify that it supports the depreciation, financial reporting, and audit controls you need” GPT-6 Luna · Fixed asset accounting · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Snipe-IT, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Snipe-IT was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Snipe-IT, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Snipe-IT was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Snipe-IT. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 16 answers that named Snipe-IT and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
tech.co11
sourceforge.net8
moneysoft.com7
assettiger.com6
curatesuite.com6
facilio.com6
xero.com6
capterra.com5
gocodes.com5
guideflow.com5
Sixty-five of the sixty-five domain citations in answers naming Snipe-IT came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
snipeitapp.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Snipe-IT takes 0% of first choices and Sage Fixed Assets takes 34%.ShowHide
Search and answers
snipeitapp.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Snipe-IT takes 0% of first choices and Sage Fixed Assets takes 34%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “fixed asset tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “fixed asset accounting software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 5,400 a month (“snipe-it”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 13,860 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 6,867 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 219 · 90 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,799
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 23 of 107 in fixed asset accounting
Segment leader
34%
Sage Fixed Assets
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 16 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 16 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Follow Snipe-IT
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Snipe-IT is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Snipe-IT is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- a free, open source IT asset management system
- Price stated
- 39.99 snipeitapp.com
- Starting price
- 39.99 snipeitapp.com
- Free plan or trial
- Free Forever snipeitapp.com
- Hosting
- OregonN. VirginiaSao PauloIrelandLondonFrankfurtSingaporeSeoul
- Customers named
- East Carter County R-II School DistrictMicrosoftChurch of the Highlands
- Not stated on the pages read
- Who it is for, integrations, certifications
What Snipe-IT's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: snipeitapp.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Snipe-IT's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Snipe-IT, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Snipe-IT by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Snipe-IT is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Snipe-IT, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.