AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › Softr · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

Softr

8Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
1 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Softr was named 2 times in Strategic sourcing and 1 other category, where oboloo led with 15%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In strategic sourcing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Softr for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Strategic sourcingSpend and procurement0%98 of 1280%1under 10 labels · led by oboloo at 15%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Supplier managementSpend and procurement0%66 of 1110%1under 10 labels · led by Precoro at 14%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Softr held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 10 points.

Best category · Strategic sourcing · by segment

Small businessgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsNot ranked
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 90 of 120, unchanged

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Strategic sourcing0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 98 of 128, unchanged
Supplier management0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 45 → 66 of 111

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Softr across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01102
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 label1
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“building a portal via Softr and Airtable will give you a custom system for almost no cost” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Supplier management · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Softr, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Softr was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
SAP Ariba6 of 81Not among the top eight
Tradogram6 of 81Not among the top eight
Coupa6 of 80Not among the top eight
Precoro5 of 82Not among the top eight
Procurify4 of 80Not among the top eight
oboloo2 of 81Not among the top eight
ComplianceQuest2 of 80Not among the top eight
Gatekeeper2 of 80Not among the top eight
Jaggaer2 of 80Not among the top eight
Zluri2 of 80Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Softr. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 8 answers that named Softr and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

softr.ioYour site8
tradogram.com6
tradebeyond.com5
capterra.com4
reddit.com4
softwareconnect.com4
mindsprint.com3
oboloo.com3
precoro.com3
ramp.com3

Thirty-five of the forty-three domain citations in answers naming Softr came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

softr.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Softr takes 0% of first choices and oboloo takes 15%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “sourcing tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “strategic sourcing software”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
368,000 a month (“softr”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
279 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 146,476 a month
Searches its site ranks for
9,348 · 443 in the top three
Sites linking to it
6,040
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
85 ads · 49 text, 23 video, 13 image · 45 shown in the last 30 days

First shown February 2024, as Softr Platforms GmbH, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 49 in the year, 36 before. 8 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 98 of 128 in strategic sourcing
Segment leader
15%
oboloo
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
8 answers
Its own site cited
in 8 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on softr.io
10,002
subdomains included
Content
1,220
counted in the table below
Documentation
4,942
Product · Integration
58 · 186
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog44072026-09-25
Podcast or video216undated
Comparison18562026-09-18
Template or tool145undated
Glossary or explainer7522026-09-25
Conference or event6302026-04-10
Case study6232026-09-15
News or press1802023-05-14
Webinar or virtual event902024-09-10
Report or ebook702024-06-09

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page softr.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Softr

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Softr; a claim can dispute any of them.
Softr + Airtable 1

Follow Softr

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Softr is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Build secure portals and internal tools, no developer required.
For
business operations
Price stated
On annual billing the monthly rates are Free $0, Basic $19, Pro $99, and Business $329. Softr has four self-serve plans plus custom Enterprise pricing. softr.io
Starting price
0 softr.io
Free plan or trial
Start for free softr.io
Integrations claimed
21 softr.io · 15 softr.io/pricing · 17 softr.io/solutions/hr pages disagree
Certifications
GDPR ReadySOC 2SOC 2 Type II compliantGDPRSOC 2 Type 2SOC2
Hosting
GermanyFrankfurt (Germany)BelgiumEUUS
Customers named
NetflixGoogleStripeUPSTorigen PharmaceuticalsMinerva NetworkCelonisUrban's Group

What Softr's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: softr.io, softr.io, softr.io/pricing, trust.softr.io, softr.io/solutions/hr. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Softr's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Softr, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Softr by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Softr is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Softr, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at softr.io is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.