Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 75 of 80, unchanged
Spreadsheets
32Judge labels
0First choices
31Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
6Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Fixed asset accounting for mid-market buyers
Rank 107 of 107 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 100% of its 3 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business76 of 81
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market107 of 107
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise109 of 109
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
In fixed asset accounting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Spreadsheets for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed asset accounting | Accounting and close | 0% | 107 of 107 | 100% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Fixed Assets at 34% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Lease accounting | Accounting and close | 0% | 71 of 71 | 100% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by FinQuery at 29% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Cap table management | Equity and corporate | 0% | 42 of 42 | 100% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Carta at 33% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Revenue recognition | Accounting and close | 0% | 77 of 77 | 100% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Maxio at 20% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Corporate tax provision | Tax and compliance | 0% | 96 of 102 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Tax Provision at 21% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Internal controls and SOX | Tax and compliance | 0% | 85 of 90 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 25% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Spreadsheets held within the floor in all six categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Fixed asset accounting · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 91 → 104 of 104
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 83 → 104 of 104
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed asset accounting | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 91 → 107 of 107 |
| Lease accounting | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 58 → 71 of 71 |
| Cap table management | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 41 → 42 of 42 |
| Revenue recognition | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 69 → 77 of 77 |
| Corporate tax provision | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 83 → 96 of 102 |
| Internal controls | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 71 → 85 of 90 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Spreadsheets across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Spreadsheets across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative31 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative32 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“the clearest answer from the sources is: spreadsheets once you're past the very earliest stage, because they lack audit trails” Perplexity Sonar · Cap table management · negative prompt · hard negative
“Spreadsheets (e.g., Excel or Google Sheets) are the primary internal controls "tool" to avoid or approach with extreme caution.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Internal controls · negative prompt · hard negative
“Spreadsheets are error-prone, difficult to audit, and poorly suited to managing the volume of calculations” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Lease accounting · negative prompt · hard negative
“Spreadsheets for Complex Asset Management ... they become problematic as your asset portfolio grows” MiniMax M2.5 · Fixed asset accounting · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Spreadsheets, over the 32 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Spreadsheets was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Spreadsheets, over the 32 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Spreadsheets was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Spreadsheets. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 32 of the 32 answers that named Spreadsheets and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
worldmetrics.org11
guideflow.com10
sage.com10
g2.com8
gitnux.org8
mrisoftware.com8
finance-ai-index.com7
softwareadvice.com7
asset.accountant6
assetcues.com6
No domain is on file for Spreadsheets, so its own site is not marked.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Names read as Spreadsheets
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Spreadsheets; a claim can dispute any of them.
Manual Spreadsheets (Excel / Google Sheets) 1Spreadsheets (Excel) 1Spreadsheets (Excel/Google Sheets) 1Spreadsheets (e.g., Excel for revenue schedules) 1Spreadsheets (e.g., Excel or Google Sheets) 1Spreadsheets (e.g., Excel or home-grown templates) 1Spreadsheets (e.g., Excel) 1Spreadsheets / Excel, Google Sheets, etc. 1spreadsheets 1
Follow Spreadsheets
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Spreadsheets's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Spreadsheets, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Spreadsheets by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Spreadsheets is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Spreadsheets, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.