Small business▲+8Since September 2026: 0% → 8%, +8 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
8%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 2 pointsRank 15 → 5 of 103
Syft · 4 categories · RankedSyft Analytics
34Judge labels
7First choices
1Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
4Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Financial reporting for mid-market buyers
Rank 18 of 105 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 33% of its 3 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business6 of 105
7%6 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market18 of 105
2%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In financial reporting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Syft Analytics for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial reporting and dashboards | Planning and analysis | 2% | 18 of 105 | 33% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 33% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| FP&A platforms | Planning and analysis | 2% | 16 of 74 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Planful at 20% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. |
| Financial consolidation | Accounting and close | 2% | 14 of 102 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Prophix at 24% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Cash flow forecasting | Treasury and cash | 0% | 78 of 101 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Agicap at 13% | goneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Syft Analytics held within the floor in all four categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Financial reporting · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 16 → 18 of 102
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial consolidation | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 29 → 14 of 102 |
| FP&A platforms | 0% | 2% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. | New this edition | Rank 16 of 74, unchanged |
| Financial reporting | 2% | 2% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 16 → 18 of 105 |
| Cash flow forecasting | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 75 → 78 of 101 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Syft Analytics across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Syft Analytics across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labels1
Paraphrase6 labelsNone
Comparative6 labelsNone
Budget-constrained11 labels4
Scale-constrained5 labels2
Negative2 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative34 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Syft Analytics *(Best Value Overall)* ... highly regarded as one of the most cost-effective financial reporting tools on the market” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Financial reporting · budget prompt · first choice
“Syft Analytics stands out as one of the best options for financial consolidation software” Grok 4.1 Fast · Financial consolidation · budget prompt · first choice
“For the tightest budgets: Start with Syft Analytics (free tier)” Kimi K2 · FP&A platforms · budget prompt · first choice
“OneStream or Syft Analytics | Handles sophisticated eliminations, ownership structures, and unlimited entities.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Financial consolidation · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“worth a look for reporting dashboards and analysis, but they're usually better once you already have accounting data in place and may cost more” GPT-5.4 mini · Financial reporting · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Syft Analytics, over the 34 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Syft Analytics was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Syft Analytics, over the 34 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Syft Analytics was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Syft Analytics. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 34 of the 34 answers that named Syft Analytics and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
fathomhq.com19
technologyadvice.com12
guideflow.com11
liveflow.com11
prophix.com10
capterra.com9
consolidate.io9
cubesoftware.com9
highradius.com9
g2.com8
107 of the 107 domain citations in answers naming Syft Analytics came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
syftanalytics.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Syft Analytics takes 2% of first choices and Sage Intacct takes 33%.ShowHide
Search and answers
syftanalytics.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Syft Analytics takes 2% of first choices and Sage Intacct takes 33%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “reporting tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “financial reporting software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 590 a month (“syft analytics”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 14 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 1,190 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 377 · 14 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 871
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 18 of 105 in financial reporting
Segment leader
33%
Sage Intacct
- First choices
- 7 across its categories
- Named in
- 34 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 34 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on syftanalytics.com
484
subdomains included
Content
351
counted in the table below
Documentation
109
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 337 | 21 | 2026-09-03 | Financial consolidation, Accounting software | |
| Glossary or explainer | 7 | 0 | 2025-12-17 | ||
| Comparison | 3 | 0 | 2026-06-15 | ||
| Conference or event | 2 | undated | |||
| Case study | 1 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-0316254013 scale your accounting practice with confidence kpi bulk sharing and pre built metrics blog
- 2026-09-029292508 7 ways to keep your data secure blog
- 2026-09-029413795 why outsourcing your bookkeeping accounting could be the best decision you make blog
- 2026-09-029414468 secure your business essential protection measures to take blog
- 2026-09-029414518 harness the power of reporting and analytics to grow your small business blog
- 2026-09-029414586 how to go from juggling 100 tasks to running your business with finesse blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page syftanalytics.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Syft Analytics
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Syft Analytics; a claim can dispute any of them.
Syft Analytics (acquired by Xero) 1
Follow Syft Analytics
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Syft is the company behind Syft Analytics.ShowHide
The company
Syft is the company behind Syft Analytics.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The only AI-first financial reporting platform
- Price stated
- Standard $23 per month; Plus $47 per month; Advanced $95 per month; Basic Free Plan Forever syftanalytics.com/pricing-page
- Starting price
- 23 syftanalytics.com/pricing-page
- Free plan or trial
- Try for free syftanalytics.com
- Certifications
- SOC2GDPRSOC 2
- Customers named
- EllipticKismet TechnologiesAtariBDO
- Not stated on the pages read
- Who it is for, integrations, hosting
What Syft Analytics's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: syftanalytics.com, syftanalytics.com/pricing-page, syftanalytics.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Syft Analytics's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Syft Analytics, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Syft Analytics by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Syft Analytics is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Syft Analytics, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.