Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 109 → 85 of 106
2 categories · RankedTradeshift
33Judge labels
3First choices
2Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Global e-invoicing compl for mid-market buyers
Rank 10 of 136 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 11 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Tradeshift →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business93 of 114
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market10 of 136
2%11 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise17 of 90
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
In global e-invoicing compl · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Tradeshift for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global e-invoicing compliance | Tax and compliance | 2% | 10 of 136 | 0% | 11 | accepted challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Procure-to-pay | Spend and procurement | 0% | 32 of 87 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Procurify at 42% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Tradeshift held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Global e-invoicing compl · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 28 → 9 of 116
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 20 → 17 of 87
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global e-invoicing compl | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 28 → 10 of 136 |
| Procure-to-pay | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 32 of 87, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Tradeshift across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Tradeshift across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct11 labels3
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative9 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained6 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative33 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“the strongest, most‑balanced e‑invoicing compliance platforms are Tradeshift, Basware, Sovos, Pagero, and Avalara” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Global e-invoicing compl · direct prompt · first choice
“For network-based supplier collaboration and modular growth, Tradeshift is a top pick.” Mistral Small · Global e-invoicing compl · direct prompt · alternative
“Tradeshift if you want a cross-border invoicing network and partner interoperability.” GPT-5.4 mini · Global e-invoicing compl · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for: Mid-market to large enterprises needing procurement + invoicing” MiniMax M2.5 · Global e-invoicing compl · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Tradeshift, over the 33 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Tradeshift was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Tradeshift, over the 33 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Tradeshift was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Tradeshift. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 26 of the 33 answers that named Tradeshift and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
mindsprint.com14
gitnux.org10
sourceforge.net10
taxtech500.com10
tradeshift.comYour site10
worldmetrics.org10
zipdo.co10
avalara.com7
bill.com6
g2.com6
Eighty-three of the ninety-three domain citations in answers naming Tradeshift came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
tradeshift.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Tradeshift takes 2% of first choices and Avalara E-Invoicing takes 25%.ShowHide
Search and answers
tradeshift.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Tradeshift takes 2% of first choices and Avalara E-Invoicing takes 25%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “e-invoicing platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “e-invoicing compliance platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,300 a month (“tradeshift”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 9 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 2,240 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,120 · 17 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,848
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 10 of 136 in global e-invoicing compl
Segment leader
25%
Avalara E-Invoicing
- First choices
- 3 across its categories
- Named in
- 33 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 26 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on tradeshift.com
1,791
subdomains included
Content
343
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
22 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 272 | 13 | 2026-09-24 | Procure-to-pay, Accounts payable automat | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 23 | 2 | 2026-09-23 | Procure-to-pay | |
| Report or ebook | 17 | 1 | 2026-07-01 | Global e-invoicing compl | |
| Case study | 7 | 1 | 2026-07-21 | ||
| Comparison | 7 | 1 | 2026-08-17 | ||
| News or press | 7 | 2 | 2026-09-14 | ||
| Template or tool | 5 | 1 | 2026-08-03 | ||
| Conference or event | 3 | 0 | 2025-01-15 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 2 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-24Zatca saudi arabia enterprise transformation blog
- 2026-09-24Fall release 2026 ai powered ap automation analytics blog
- 2026-09-23Reporting analytics app webinar webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-22Fall release 2026 e invoicing compliance updates blog
- 2026-09-16Zatca e invoicing data saudi arabia financing blog
- 2026-09-14Tradeshift arabia incorporated in saudi arabia news or press
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page tradeshift.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Tradeshift
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Tradeshift is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Tradeshift is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AP automation, e-Invoicing, Procure to-Pay Platform
- For
- buyers; finance & procurement; AP teams; sellers
- Certifications
- Certified Peppol Access PointPermanent Plateforme AgrééePA certified in FranceISO27001SOC type 1 and 2SOC 1 Type IISOC 2 Type IIISAE 3402 Type II
- Hosting
- IrelandUnited States
- Customers named
- Le Bon MarchéDHLNHS SBSNHS Shared Business ServicesSchaeffler
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations
What Tradeshift's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: tradeshift.com, tradeshift.com/security, tradeshift.com/platform, tradeshift.com/resources/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Tradeshift's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Tradeshift, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Tradeshift by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Tradeshift is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Tradeshift, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.