Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 90 → 96 of 106
Tungsten · 1 category · RankedTungsten Network
24Judge labels
0First choices
7Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Global e-invoicing compl for enterprise buyers
Rank 84 of 136 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 20% of its 5 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business103 of 114
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market84 of 136
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise19 of 90
0%18 labels
criticized challenger
In global e-invoicing compl · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Tungsten Network for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global e-invoicing compliance | Tax and compliance | 0% | 84 of 136 | 20% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Avalara E-Invoicing at 25% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Tungsten Network held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Global e-invoicing compl · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 43 → 92 of 116
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 31 → 19 of 87
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global e-invoicing compl | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 43 → 84 of 136 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Tungsten Network across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Tungsten Network across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct6 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative9 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative24 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Tungsten if supplier network exchange and invoice automation are your focus.” GPT-5.4 mini · Global e-invoicing compl · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“System Reliability Issues: Consistent user complaints about frequent downtime, timeouts, and performance problems” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Global e-invoicing compl · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Tungsten Network, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Tungsten Network was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Tungsten Network, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Tungsten Network was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Tungsten Network. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 22 of the 23 answers that named Tungsten Network and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
mindsprint.com13
worldmetrics.org11
tungstenautomation.comYour site10
zipdo.co10
avalara.com9
cleartax.com7
thedigitalprojectmanager.com7
g2.com6
gitnux.org6
medium.com6
Seventy-five of the eighty-five domain citations in answers naming Tungsten Network came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
tungstenautomation.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Tungsten Network takes 0% of first choices and Avalara E-Invoicing takes 25%.ShowHide
Search and answers
tungstenautomation.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Tungsten Network takes 0% of first choices and Avalara E-Invoicing takes 25%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “e-invoicing platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “e-invoicing compliance platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,600 a month (“tungsten network”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 12 a month
- Its company's site
- tungstenautomation.com shared with Tungsten's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 37,829 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 6,421 · 511 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 4,512
- Paid Google search
- 2 searches its ads show for, about 15 clicks and $741 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 84 of 136 in global e-invoicing compl
Segment leader
25%
Avalara E-Invoicing
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 23 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 22 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Tungsten Network
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Tungsten Network; a claim can dispute any of them.
Tungsten 2Tungsten Automation 1Tungsten Automation / Tungsten Network 1
Follow Tungsten Network
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Tungsten is the company behind Tungsten Network.ShowHide
The company
Tungsten is the company behind Tungsten Network.
ShowHideOn record
Company records- Also from Tungsten
- Tungsten Automation
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Tungsten Network's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Tungsten Network, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Tungsten Network by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Tungsten Network is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Tungsten Network, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.