Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 65 → 63 of 88
2 categories · RankedTrintech Cadency
76Judge labels
3First choices
19Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
6% in Account reconciliation for enterprise buyers
Rank 69 of 85 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 38% of its 8 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business76 of 92
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market69 of 85
0%8 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise10 of 75
0%19 labels
accepted challenger
In financial close manageme · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Trintech Cadency for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial close management | Accounting and close | 0% | 69 of 85 | 38% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 55% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Account reconciliation | Accounting and close | 0% | 53 of 82 | 29% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 33% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Trintech Cadency held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Financial close manageme · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 67 → 66 of 77
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 11 → 10 of 71
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial close manageme | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 67 → 69 of 85 |
| Account reconciliation | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 40 → 53 of 82 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Trintech Cadency across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Trintech Cadency across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct14 labels1
Paraphrase11 labelsNone
Comparative14 labels3not counted in share
Budget-constrained13 labels2
Scale-constrained11 labelsNone
Negative13 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative76 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Global organizations prioritizing controls, reconciliations, and audit evidence” GPT-6 Luna · Financial close manageme · comparative prompt · alternative
“Larger organizations seeking configurable close and reconciliation processes” GPT-6 Luna · Account reconciliation · comparative prompt · alternative
“Examples: BlackLine, Trintech Cadency, FloQast, HighRadius.” GPT-5.4 mini · Account reconciliation · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“What to Avoid ... Trintech Cadency — predominantly built for enterprise-scale volume and pricing.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Account reconciliation · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“A BlackLine or Cadency rollout often takes months (sometimes over a year), requires dedicated system administrators” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Financial close manageme · negative prompt · soft negative
“Policy\u2011heavy, compliance\u2011driven environments (often larger organizations)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Financial close manageme · budget prompt · soft negative
“often too expensive, complex to implement, and require dedicated administrators” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Account reconciliation · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Trintech Cadency, over the 76 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Trintech Cadency was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Trintech Cadency, over the 76 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Trintech Cadency was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Trintech Cadency. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 74 of the 76 answers that named Trintech Cadency and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
numeric.io44
bluecopa.com39
maxima.ai26
cfoshortlist.com25
satvasolutions.com25
prophix.com23
ramp.com23
guideflow.com22
highradius.com22
g2.com17
266 of the 266 domain citations in answers naming Trintech Cadency came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
trintech.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Trintech Cadency takes 0% of first choices and FloQast takes 55%.ShowHide
Search and answers
trintech.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Trintech Cadency takes 0% of first choices and FloQast takes 55%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “close management tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “financial close management software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 110 a month (“trintech cadency”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 3 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 30,370 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,316 · 297 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,386
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 69 of 85 in financial close manageme
Segment leader
55%
FloQast
- First choices
- 3 across its categories
- Named in
- 76 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 74 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on trintech.com
1,896
subdomains included
Content
1,584
counted in the table below
Documentation
2
Product · Integration
10 · 62
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 738 | 12 | 2026-09-23 | Account reconciliation, Financial consolidation | |
| News or press | 193 | 2 | 2026-08-11 | Financial close manageme, Accounting software | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 178 | 1 | 2026-09-23 | Account reconciliation, Financial close manageme | |
| Conference or event | 148 | 0 | 2025-12-22 | ||
| Case study | 115 | 2 | 2026-08-11 | Account reconciliation | |
| Podcast or video | 108 | 1 | 2026-07-14 | ||
| Report or ebook | 70 | 1 | 2026-09-02 | Financial close manageme, Account reconciliation | |
| Glossary or explainer | 17 | 1 | 2026-08-04 | Cash application | |
| Comparison | 11 | 2 | 2026-08-10 | ||
| Template or tool | 6 | 0 | 2026-03-10 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-23G2 grid report for enterprise financial reconciliation 2026 blog
- 2026-09-23Webinar governed autonomous finance trintechs ai strategy and the state of ai in the close webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-23Building societies mortgage lending risks blog
- 2026-09-15From best practices to better processes how trintech cadency simplifies intercompany accounting blog
- 2026-09-13The ai financial close sgp sep 17 blog
- 2026-09-08Cash is of the past retail accounting solutions blog
Events in person
Upcoming
- October 15, 2026Trintech Connect London 2026Shangri-La The Shard, London, United Kingdom · hosts
Last twelve months
- June 14, 2026 to June 16, 20262026 FMS Annual ConferenceNew Orleans · exhibited
- March 18, 2026Trintech User Groups – KrakowWyndham Grand Krakow Old Town, Krakow, Poland · hosted
- November 13, 2025 to November 14, 2025HOSPACE 2025Royal Lancaster Hotel, London · exhibited
As the event pages on trintech.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page trintech.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Trintech Cadency
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Trintech Cadency; a claim can dispute any of them.
Cadency 5Trintech Cadency/Adra 1
Follow Trintech Cadency
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Trintech Cadency's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Trintech Cadency, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Trintech Cadency by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Trintech Cadency is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Trintech Cadency, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.