AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › Zeck · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

Zeck

25Judge labels
5First choices
1Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
7 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Zeck was named 7 times in Board portals and 1 other category, where OnBoard led with 49%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In board portals · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Zeck for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Board portalsEquity and corporate2%11 of 500%5under 10 labels · led by OnBoard at 49%
Board and investor reportingPlanning and analysis0%32 of 990%2under 10 labels · led by OnBoard at 26%▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Zeck yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Zeck across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500101
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash12003
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B01001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labels1
Paraphrase2 labels1
Comparative11 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained2 labels1
Scale-constrained3 labels2
Negative4 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative25 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“a modern interactive tool (like Zeck) to determine which style fits your company's culture” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Board portals · scale prompt · first choice
“If you are a tech startup or VC-backed venture, look closely at Zeck” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Board portals · comparative prompt · alternative
“Designed specifically for mid-size companies; emphasizes board engagement” Kimi K2 · Board · direct prompt · alternative
“Zeck is the premier option ... Best for Modern, Interactive Reporting” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Board · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Zeck, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Zeck was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Diligent Boards22 of 256Not among the top eight
OnBoard20 of 254Not among the top eight
Nasdaq Boardvantage18 of 252Not among the top eight
Boardable17 of 252Not among the top eight
BoardPro14 of 256Not among the top eight
Board Intelligence8 of 250Not among the top eight
BoardEffect6 of 250Not among the top eight
Govenda5 of 250Not among the top eight
Azeus Convene4 of 250Not among the top eight
Fathom4 of 250Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Zeck. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 25 of the 25 answers that named Zeck and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

zeck.appYour site22
boardintelligence.com18
onboardmeetings.com16
board-room.org14
guideflow.com14
boardpro.com11
capterra.com11
diligent.com10
g2.com10
fast.io9

113 of the 135 domain citations in answers naming Zeck came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

zeck.app ranks 10 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Zeck takes 2% of first choices and OnBoard takes 49%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “board portal”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “board portals”
10
Searches for its name, Google
4,400 a month (“zeck”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
205 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 1,680 a month
Searches its site ranks for
67 · 15 in the top three
Sites linking to it
205
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
24 ads · 22 text, 2 image · 9 shown in the last 30 days

First shown January 2022, as Zeck, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 9 in the year, 15 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 11 of 50 in board portals
Segment leader
49%
OnBoard
First choices
5 across its categories
Named in
25 answers
Its own site cited
in 25 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on zeck.app
293
subdomains included
Content
97
counted in the table below
Documentation
101
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog7012026-08-11
Comparison11undated
Case study10undated
Conference or event3undated
Template or tool2undated
Webinar or virtual event1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page zeck.app exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Zeck

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Zeck is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
software that reimagines the ridiculous board meeting process to drive way better decision making with your board and investors
For
board and investors
Certifications
SOC 2 Certified
Customers named
Synthica EnergyWilliam Murray GolfSalesforce VenturesHigh Plains BankDesert Highlands GCTunnels to Towers FoundationSantaluz ClubChain.io
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What Zeck's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: zeck.app, zeck.app. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Zeck's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Zeck, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Zeck by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Zeck is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Zeck, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at zeck.app is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.