Accounts receivable automation for enterprise buyers
Asked as “accounts receivable automation software”, and as “collections management tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 49 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
78%
Clear leader
78HighRadius06Billtrust04Gaviti12others
78% of first choices, clear leader.
Since September 2026▲+12Since September 2026: 67% → 79%, +12 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.HighRadius held the lead, +12 points on 67%, past the floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
BILL Accounts Receivable17%Contested▼−9Since September 2026: 27% → 17%, −9 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-market
Upflow17%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Upflow (18%) replaces Zoho Books (15% then, 14% now), 5 points clear, inside the 10-point floor.Standing →Enterprise
HighRadius78%Clear leader▲+12Since September 2026: 67% → 79%, +12 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.This page
BILL Accounts Receivable17%Contested▼−9Since September 2026: 27% → 17%, −9 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-marketUpflow17%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Upflow (18%) replaces Zoho Books (15% then, 14% now), 5 points clear, inside the 10-point floor.Standing →EnterpriseHighRadius78%Clear leader▲+12Since September 2026: 67% → 79%, +12 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01HighRadius78%14%65endorsed leader▲+12Since September 2026: 67% → 79%, +12 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.67% → 79%
HighRadius78%14%65endorsed leader▲+12Since September 2026: 67% → 79%, +12 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.67% → 79%02
Billtrust6%7%45accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 9% → 7%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.9% → 7%
Billtrust6%7%45accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 9% → 7%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.9% → 7%Show the seven products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
09BILL Accounts Receivable0%62%13criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%
BILL Accounts Receivable0%62%13criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%08Upflow0%32%19criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Upflow0%32%19criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%05
BlackLine Invoice-to-Cash0%16%19accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
BlackLine Invoice-to-Cash0%16%19accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%04
Esker0%12%24accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Esker0%12%24accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%06
Sidetrade0%12%16accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Sidetrade0%12%16accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%07
Tesorio0%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Tesorio0%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%03
Versapay0%0%21accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Versapay0%0%21accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Upflow vs Quadient ARUpflow vs GavitiUpflow vs HighRadiusUpflow vs ChaserZoho Books vs VersapayZoho Books vs BilltrustZoho Books vs Quadient ARZoho Books vs GavitiZoho Books vs HighRadiusZoho Books vs ChaserVersapay vs BilltrustVersapay vs Quadient ARVersapay vs GavitiVersapay vs HighRadiusVersapay vs ChaserBilltrust vs Quadient ARBilltrust vs GavitiBilltrust vs HighRadiusBilltrust vs ChaserQuadient AR vs GavitiQuadient AR vs HighRadiusQuadient AR vs ChaserGaviti vs HighRadiusGaviti vs ChaserHighRadius vs Chaser
One product takes 78% of first choices here, so the chart would put eight markers in one corner and one at the far edge. The two measurements it plots are columns in the standing above: share, and the negative label rate. Two products carry a negative rate above 25% in this category.
What they warned about
Nine of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
HighRadius14%
9 of 65 labels negative · 8 of 14 models
“HighRadius and similar enterprise platforms are suitable for large firms, but Upflow notes they can require significant implementation time and IT resources” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt
BILL Accounts Receivable62%
8 of 13 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Tools Often Flagged for Caution or Avoidance: 1. **Narrowly Focused Tools (e.g., Bill.com, Stampli, Tipalti, Medius, Basware)**” Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt
Upflow32%
6 of 19 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Solutions like Upflow and similar platforms ... lack autonomous execution, making them less suitable for mid-market and enterprise companies” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
Chaser38%
3 of 8 labels negative · 3 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Per-User Models to Avoid ... **Chaser** (~$259-$1,169/month) - caps users in lower tiers” MiniMax M2.5, budget prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
78 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1104 links across 209 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 5 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · HighRadius40 answers · 81 citations · 12 models
28 answers · 31 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Upflow28 answers · 31 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Bluecopa25 answers · 41 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Emagia24 answers · 32 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Stuut23 answers · 52 citations · 8 models
vendor site · G223 answers · 32 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Eco22 answers · 22 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Billtrust21 answers · 27 citations · 11 models
vendor site · TreviPay19 answers · 19 citations · 11 models
vendor site · G218 answers · 24 citations · 10 models
15 answers · 18 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
26 answers · 11 models
22 answers · 11 models
19 answers · 11 models
18 answers · 8 models
14 answers · 10 models
13 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 7 models
12 answers · 9 models
12 answers · 9 models
11 answers · 9 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “accounts receivable automation software”, “ar automation tools”, “best accounts receivable automation software”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HighRadius highradius.com | 78% | 691 | 6,600 | 118 | 294,561 | $2,272 | 120 | 1 |
| Billtrust billtrust.com | 6% | 317 | 6,600 | 159 | 50,343 | $718 | 15 | 6 |
| Quadient quadient.com Quadient AR 4%, Quadient AR Automation 0% | 4% | 85 | 50 | 4 | 131,433 company | $83 | 42 | |
| Gaviti gaviti.com | 4% | 136 | 320 | 4 | 6,043 | 0 | ||
| Bluecopa bluecopa.com | 2% | 40 | 50 | 4 | 1,412 | |||
| HighRadius Autonomous Receivables / HighRadius Accounts Receivable | 2% | |||||||
| Oracle Fusion Cloud AR | 2% | |||||||
| SAP S/4HANA sap.com SAP S/4HANA 2%, SAP S/4HANA Finance 0% | 2% | 178 | 376 | 2,214,514 | $1,251 | 23 | ||
| Versapay versapay.com | 0% | 207 | 6,600 | 106 | 39,155 | $12,320 | 29 | 2 |
| Esker esker.com | 0% | 207 | 12,100 | 383 | 12,337 | 5 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 16 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (billtrust.com, highradius.com, trevipay.com). The first result for “accounts receivable automation software” is highradius.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best accounts receivable automation software for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which collections management tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade AR automation tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best accounts receivable automation software for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating an accounts receivable automation software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which AR automation tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5HighRadiusno first choiceChangedHighRadiusHighRadiusno first choiceagainst: Billtrust, HighRadius, Upflow
Two alternatives
Billtrust, VersapayThree alternatives
Billtrust, Serrala Alevate AR, VersapayTwo alternatives
Centime, NetSuite ARGPT-5.4 miniHighRadiusagainst: Sage IntacctHighRadiusHeldHighRadiusHighRadiusagainst: Upflowno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Billtrust, TesorioTwo alternatives
Billtrust, TesorioTwo alternatives
BlackLine Invoice-to-Cash, SAP Cash ApplicationOne alternative
BilltrustGemini 3.5 FlashHighRadiusHighRadiusHeldHighRadiusGavitiagainst: Billtrust, HighRadiusno first choiceagainst: BILL Accounts Receivable, Chaser, Melio, Plooto, Upflow, Zoho Books
Four alternatives
Billtrust, Serrala, Sidetrade, VersapayFour alternatives
Billtrust, BlackLine Invoice-to-Cash, Esker, SidetradeFive alternatives
Billtrust, Esker, Sidetrade, TreviPay, VersapayTwo alternatives
Upflow, VersapayPerplexity SonarBilltrustHighRadiusChangedBlackLine Invoice-to-Cash, HighRadiusagainst: BILL Accounts Receivable, InvoiceSherpa, UpflowHighRadiusno first choiceagainst: HighRadius
Two alternatives
BlackLine Invoice-to-Cash, HighRadiusThree alternatives
Billtrust, Esker, UpflowThree alternatives
Monk, Serrala, TabsOne alternative
BilltrustGrok 4.1 FastHighRadiusagainst: Emagia, InvoicedHighRadiusHeldHighRadiusHighRadiusagainst: BILL Accounts Receivable, NetSuite ERPno first choiceagainst: BILL Accounts Receivable, Basware, BlackLine Invoice-to-Cash, HighRadius, Medius, Stampli, Tipalti
Two alternatives
Billtrust, EskerOne alternative
BilltrustFour alternatives
Billtrust, Esker, Sidetrade, VersapayOne alternative
MaxioMistral SmallBilltrust, HighRadiusBluecopa, HighRadiusChangedHighRadiusHighRadiusagainst: BlackLine Invoice-to-Cash, Sidetradeno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Gaviti, Quadient AR, UpflowFour alternatives
BlackLine Invoice-to-Cash, Esker, Gaviti, SidetradeDeepSeek V4 FlashHighRadiusHighRadiusHeldHighRadiusBilltrustagainst: Esker, HighRadiusno first choiceagainst: Automation Anywhere, Blue Prism, UiPath
Three alternatives
Billtrust, Esker, SidetradeThree alternatives
Billtrust, Esker, VersapayFour alternatives
Billtrust, BlackLine Invoice-to-Cash, Esker, VersapayOne alternative
BILL Accounts ReceivableLlama 4 MaverickHighRadiusHighRadius, Quadient ARChangedno first choiceHighRadiusHighRadiusagainst: Esker, HighRadius, Sidetrade
Two alternatives
Billtrust, TreviPayTwo alternatives
Emagia, UpflowThree alternatives
CR Software, Tabs, UpflowQwen 3.7 FlashHighRadiusHighRadiusHeldno first choiceHighRadiusagainst: BILL Accounts Receivable, ChaserHighRadiusnothing named
Four alternatives
Billtrust, Oracle Receivables, SAP Cash Application, SAP S/4HANA FinanceTwo alternatives
Billtrust, BluecopaThree alternatives
Invoiced, Tesorio, VersapayThree alternatives
BILL Accounts Receivable, Tipalti, TreviPayKimi K2HighRadiusagainst: EskerHighRadiusHeldHighRadiusagainst: BlackLine Invoice-to-CashOracle Fusion Cloud AR, SAP S/4HANAagainst: BILL Accounts Receivable, Chargezoom, HighRadiusHighRadiusnothing named
Two alternatives
Billtrust, BlackLine Invoice-to-CashFour alternatives
BlackLine Invoice-to-Cash, Esker, Oracle Advanced Collections, SAP Credit ManagementFour alternatives
Billtrust, Emagia, Esker, SidetradeTwo alternatives
BlackLine Invoice-to-Cash, EskerFour alternatives
Billtrust, Emagia, Fazeshift, VersapayGLM 4.7 FlashXHighRadiusHighRadiusHeldHighRadiusHighRadiusno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Billtrust, EskerTwo alternatives
Billtrust, TesorioTwo alternatives
FIS GETPAID, Quadient AR AutomationTwo alternatives
BILL Accounts Receivable, VersapayMiniMax M2.5HighRadiusHighRadiusHeldHighRadiusHighRadius, Quadient ARagainst: BILL Accounts Receivable, Chaserno first choiceagainst: Billtrust
Four alternatives
Billtrust, Kyriba, SAP Accounts Receivable, UpflowFive alternatives
Billtrust, Bluecopa, Daylit, Quadient AR, SidetradeTwo alternatives
Billtrust, BluecopaGPT-6 LunaHighRadiusHighRadiusHeldno first choiceagainst: SAP Cash ApplicationGavitiagainst: HighRadiusno first choiceagainst: BILL Accounts Receivable, HighRadius, Quadient AR
Three alternatives
Billtrust, Esker, SidetradeThree alternatives
Billtrust, Esker, SAP S/4HANA Receivables ManagementOne alternative
UpflowMuse Glimmer 30BHighRadiusHighRadius Autonomous Receivables / HighRadius Accounts ReceivableChangedagainst: UpflowHighRadiusHighRadiusagainst: Kollenono first choiceagainst: Gaviti, Tesorio, Upflow
Two alternatives
Billtrust, Quadient AR, formerly YayPayThree alternatives
Billtrust, C&R Software's Debt Manager, Quadient ARThree alternatives
Billtrust, BlackLine Invoice-to-Cash, QvaliaTwo alternatives
Chaser, UpflowBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:00 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:43 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:02 | yes | 15 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:46 | yes | 16 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:14 | yes | 24 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:20 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:20 | yes | 24 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 07:38 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 07:40 | yes | 5 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:20 | yes | 14 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:56 | yes | 14 | 17 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:48 | yes | 19 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:04 | yes | 4 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:05 | yes | 15 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:50 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 07:37 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:57 | yes | 21 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:10 | yes | 16 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:56 | yes | 24 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:06 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:38 | yes | 23 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:42 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:44 | yes | 22 | 63 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:15 | yes | 18 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:27 | yes | 19 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:51 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:28 | yes | 4 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:42 | yes | 12 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:39 | yes | 9 | 10 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:24 | yes | 8 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 07:57 | yes | 15 | 28 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:57 | yes | 18 | 4 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:07 | yes | 21 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:28 | yes | 14 | 10 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:54 | yes | 25 | 36 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:04 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:14 | no | 0 | 36 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:27 | yes | 20 | 26 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:29 | yes | 13 | 40 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:18 | yes | 10 | 29 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:38 | yes | 7 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 07:56 | yes | 23 | 46 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:27 | yes | 17 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 07:48 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:16 | yes | 22 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:47 | yes | 19 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:01 | yes | 23 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:10 | yes | 24 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:26 | yes | 21 | 37 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 07:42 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:52 | yes | 22 | 126 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:03 | yes | 22 | 46 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 07:55 | yes | 21 | 52 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 07:50 | yes | 19 | 46 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:59 | yes | 3 | 34 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:23 | yes | 19 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:39 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:27 | yes | 4 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:06 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:00 | yes | 17 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:33 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:11 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:08 | yes | 18 | 40 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:23 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:52 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:43 | yes | 25 | 31 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 07:51 | yes | 15 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:30 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:43 | yes | 4 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 07:46 | yes | 12 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:36 | yes | 17 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:18 | yes | 4 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:05 | yes | 19 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:38 | yes | 19 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:14 | yes | 24 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:24 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:15 | yes | 24 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:03 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:37 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:11 | yes | 24 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:57 | yes | 22 | 39 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:22 | yes | 9 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:33 | yes | 3 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:50 | yes | 22 | 30 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
BILL read as BILL Accounts Receivable
BILL (formerly Bill.com) read as BILL Accounts Receivable
BILL.com read as BILL Accounts Receivable
Bill.com read as BILL Accounts Receivable
BlackLine read as BlackLine Invoice-to-Cash
Quadient Accounts Receivable read as Quadient AR
YayPay read as Quadient AR
Unresolved, counted raw
C&R Software
C&R Software's Debt Manager
CR Software
Cashflow
HighRadius Autonomous Receivables / HighRadius Accounts Receivable
Ledgerup.ai
Oracle Advanced Collections
Oracle Collections
Oracle Fusion Cloud AR
Rimilia
SAP Accounts Receivable
SAP S/4HANA Receivables Management
Tresco
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.