Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 57 → 15 of 57
Quadient · 6 categories · RankedQuadient AR
87Judge labels
9First choices
10Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
6Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
8% in Accounts receivable auto for mid-market buyers
Rank 5 of 79 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
3 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 13% of its 31 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Quadient AR →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business16 of 62
2%9 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market5 of 79
8%31 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise3 of 79
4%9 labels
under the label threshold
In accounts receivable auto · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Quadient AR for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accounts receivable automation | Receivables and billing | 8% | 5 of 79 | 13% | 31 | accepted challenger | ▼−1Since September 2026: 10% → 9%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| B2B credit management | Receivables and billing | 2% | 13 of 108 | 12% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by Chaser at 16% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| B2B payment acceptance | Receivables and billing | 0% | 17 of 94 | 0% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Versapay at 19% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Invoicing software | Receivables and billing | 0% | 26 of 71 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Zoho Invoice at 24% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Cash flow forecasting | Treasury and cash | 0% | 51 of 101 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Agicap at 13% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Chargeback management | Receivables and billing | 0% | 54 of 81 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Chargeflow at 24% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Quadient AR held within the floor in all six categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Accounts receivable auto · by segment
Mid-market▼−1Since September 2026: 10% → 9%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
9%from 10% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 4 → 5 of 75
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 5% → 5%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
5%from 5% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 3 of 71, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accounts receivable auto | 10% | 9% | ▼−1Since September 2026: 10% → 9%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 4 → 5 of 79 |
| B2B credit management | 2% | 2% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 11 → 13 of 108 |
| B2B payment acceptance | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 26 → 17 of 94 |
| Invoicing software | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 30 → 26 of 71 |
| Cash flow forecasting | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 51 of 101, unchanged |
| Chargeback management | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 54 of 81, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Quadient AR across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Quadient AR across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 12 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct25 labels4
Paraphrase20 labels3
Comparative14 labelsNone
Budget-constrained6 labels2
Scale-constrained11 labelsNone
Negative11 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative87 labels in all, every segment counted; 9 of the 10 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Quadient AR offers the best balance of credit management features, ease of use, proven ROI, and mid-market-appropriate pricing” Kimi K2 · B2B credit management · direct prompt · first choice
“The best accounts receivable automation software for a mid-market B2B company is Quadient AR (by YayPay) or Versapay.” Llama 4 Maverick · Accounts receivable auto · direct prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with Quadient AR (YayPay) since it's specifically designed for mid-market B2B collections” MiniMax M2.5 · Accounts receivable auto · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Best Overall for Collections Optimization and Usability” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Accounts receivable auto · direct prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Be cautious of platforms like Quadient AR (formerly YayPay) or older point solutions if they do not have deep, bidirectional, real-time sync” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Accounts receivable auto · negative prompt · soft negative
“Most vendors (including Quadient AR/YayPay, Billtrust, Gaviti, Sidetrade) publish no pricing at all” Kimi K2 · Accounts receivable auto · negative prompt · soft negative
“Rather than expensive, enterprise-grade platforms (like HighRadius or Quadient, which cost thousands)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Accounts receivable auto · budget prompt · soft negative
“built for large corporations and come with high-tier enterprise pricing” Gemini 3.5 Flash · B2B credit management · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Quadient AR, over the 87 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Quadient AR was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Quadient AR, over the 87 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Quadient AR was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Quadient AR. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 85 of the 87 answers that named Quadient AR and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
highradius.com40
chaserhq.com36
g2.com34
learn.g2.com27
bluecopa.com24
upflow.io24
worldmetrics.org23
billtrust.com20
emagia.com19
trevipay.com17
264 of the 264 domain citations in answers naming Quadient AR came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
quadient.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Quadient AR takes 8% of first choices and Upflow takes 17%.ShowHide
Search and answers
quadient.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Quadient AR takes 8% of first choices and Upflow takes 17%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “ar automation tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “accounts receivable automation software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 50 a month (“quadient ar”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 4 a month
- Its company's site
- quadient.com shared with Quadient's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 131,433 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 12,093 · 794 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 6,568
- Paid Google search
- 2 searches its ads show for, about 2 clicks and $83 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
8%
rank 5 of 79 in accounts receivable auto
Segment leader
17%
Upflow
- First choices
- 9 across its categories
- Named in
- 87 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 85 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Quadient AR
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Quadient AR; a claim can dispute any of them.
Quadient AR (formerly YayPay) 12Quadient AR (YayPay) 10Quadient 5Quadient (YayPay) 4Quadient Accounts Receivable 3Quadient A/R (YayPay) 2Quadient AR/YayPay 2Quadient AR (Yaypay) 1Quadient AR (by YayPay) 1Quadient AR / YayPay 1Quadient/YayPay 1Versapay/YayPay 1YayPay (formerly Quadient AR) 1
Follow Quadient AR
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Quadient is the company behind Quadient AR.ShowHide
The company
Quadient is the company behind Quadient AR.
ShowHideOn record
Company records- Also from Quadient
- Quadient AP, Quadient Accounts Receivable
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Take control of collections with AR automation
- For
- finance teams
- Price stated
- Our pricing packages our tailored to your business's unique needs and workflows. quadient.com/de-de/ar-automation-pricing-information
- Free plan or trial
- Request a demo quadient.com/en-us/ar-automation
- Integrations claimed
- 11 quadient.com/de-de/ar-collections-software
- Customers named
- CorneaGenCplServiceRocketGoToCheetah DigitalJumioLogMelnStackAdapt
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, certifications, hosting
What Quadient AR's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: quadient.com/en-us/ar-automation, quadient.com/de-de/ar-collections-software, quadient.com/de-de/ar-automation-pricing-information, quadient.com/de/ar-automation-transportation-and-logistics-firms, quadient.com/de/extend-your-ap-automation-with-accounts-receivable-and-cash-dashboard. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Quadient AR's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Quadient AR, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Quadient AR by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Quadient AR is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Quadient AR, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.