Internal controls and SOX for enterprise buyers
Asked as “SOX compliance software”, and as “internal controls management tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 62 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
23%
Contested · Optro 21%
23AuditBoard21Optro16Workiva40others
23% of first choices, contested.
Since September 2026=heldSince September 2026: 25% → 25%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.AuditBoard held the lead, ±0 points on 25%, inside the 10-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Vanta14%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Drata (13%) replaces Complies.ai (14% then, 6% now), 6 points clear, inside the 10-point floor.Standing →Mid-market
FloQast25%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: FloQast (27%) replaces AuditBoard (18% then, 13% now), 13 points clear, past the 10-point floor.Standing →Enterprise
AuditBoard23%Contested=heldSince September 2026: 25% → 25%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This page
Vanta14%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Drata (13%) replaces Complies.ai (14% then, 6% now), 6 points clear, inside the 10-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketFloQast25%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: FloQast (27%) replaces AuditBoard (18% then, 13% now), 13 points clear, past the 10-point floor.Standing →EnterpriseAuditBoard23%Contested=heldSince September 2026: 25% → 25%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01AuditBoard23%5%44accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 25% → 25%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.25% → 25%
AuditBoard23%5%44accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 25% → 25%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.25% → 25%02
Optro21%8%26accepted challenger▲+10Since September 2026: 10% → 21%, +10 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.10% → 21%
Optro21%8%26accepted challenger▲+10Since September 2026: 10% → 21%, +10 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.10% → 21%03
Workiva16%4%47accepted challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 12% → 15%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.12% → 15%
Workiva16%4%47accepted challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 12% → 15%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.12% → 15%04
MetricStream8%5%37accepted challenger▼−13Since September 2026: 21% → 8%, −13 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.21% → 8%
MetricStream8%5%37accepted challenger▼−13Since September 2026: 21% → 8%, −13 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.21% → 8%05
ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management3%9%33accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.6% → 4%
ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management3%9%33accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.6% → 4%06
Pathlock3%0%10accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 4%
Pathlock3%0%10accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 4%07SAP GRC3%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 4%
08
Diligent One Platform2%0%20accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Diligent One Platform2%0%20accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%09
BlackLine2%7%15accepted challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 0%
BlackLine2%7%15accepted challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 0%10
LogicGate Risk Cloud2%17%12accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
LogicGate Risk Cloud2%17%12accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%Show the one product at 0%, ordered by negative rate
11
Archer0%15%13accepted challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 0%
Archer0%15%13accepted challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 0%The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
FloQast vs OptroFloQast vs HyperproofFloQast vs ScytaleFloQast vs DrataAuditBoard vs SprintoAuditBoard vs OnspringAuditBoard vs OptroAuditBoard vs HyperproofAuditBoard vs ScytaleAuditBoard vs DrataSprinto vs OnspringSprinto vs OptroSprinto vs HyperproofSprinto vs ScytaleSprinto vs DrataOnspring vs OptroOnspring vs HyperproofOnspring vs ScytaleOnspring vs DrataOptro vs HyperproofOptro vs ScytaleOptro vs DrataHyperproof vs ScytaleHyperproof vs DrataScytale vs Drata
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203040506S07
08091011Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01AuditBoard23%
AuditBoard23%02Optro21%
Optro21%03Workiva16%
Workiva16%04MetricStream8%
MetricStream8%05ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management3%
ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management3%06Pathlock3%
Pathlock3%07SAP GRC3%
08Diligent One Platform2%
Diligent One Platform2%09BlackLine2%
BlackLine2%10LogicGate Risk Cloud2%
LogicGate Risk Cloud2%11Archer0%
Archer0%What they warned about
One of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Microsoft Excel86%
6 of 7 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“Spreadsheet-Based Systems (e.g., Excel or Google Sheets for Controls Management) - Why avoid/caution? They appear cheap and simple but fail dramatically at scale.” Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt
Google Sheets100%
4 of 4 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Spreadsheet-Based Systems (e.g., Excel or Google Sheets for Controls Management)... auditors flag heavy spreadsheet reliance as a material weakness risk” Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt
ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management9%
3 of 33 labels negative · 3 of 14 models
“Complex deployments (e.g., ServiceNow) demand specialist admins; misfits cause admin overhead, integration gaps, and "control drift."” Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt
Vanta33%
2 of 6 labels negative · 2 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid SMB tools like Drata/Vanta/Sprinto” Grok 4.1 Fast, budget prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
78 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1090 links across 256 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 28 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Optro36 answers · 47 citations · 13 models
vendor site · MetricStream27 answers · 33 citations · 12 models
vendor site · HighRadius26 answers · 33 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Sprinto26 answers · 33 citations · 12 models
25 answers · 25 citations · 10 models
vendor site · RiskWatch24 answers · 37 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Worldmetrics23 answers · 40 citations · 10 models
21 answers · 26 citations · 10 models
20 answers · 36 citations · 7 models
20 answers · 28 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Supervizor19 answers · 23 citations · 10 models
19 answers · 22 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
25 answers · 10 models
25 answers · 12 models
20 answers · 10 models
19 answers · 11 models
18 answers · 10 models
18 answers · 10 models
17 answers · 10 models
15 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 9 models
12 answers · 8 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best sox compliance software”, “internal controls tools”, “sox compliance software”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AuditBoard auditboard.com | 23% | 94 | 8,100 | 220 | 129 | 0 | ||
| Optro optro.ai | 21% | 48 | 2,900 | 39 | 126,117 | $4,599 | 75 | 4 |
| Workiva workiva.com | 16% | 596 | 22,200 | 524 | 58,186 | $23 | 64 | 3 |
| MetricStream metricstream.com | 8% | 66 | 1,000 | 35 | 94,301 | $211 | 8 | |
| SmartSuite SOX Management smartsuite.com | 6% | 27 | 0 | 19,550 | 0 | |||
| ServiceNow servicenow.com ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management 3% | 3% | 48 | 135,000 | 13,451 | 689,216 company | $673 | 101 | |
| Pathlock pathlock.com | 3% | 17 | 1,000 | 23 | 100,297 | $8,432 | 37 | 8 |
| SAP GRC | 3% | 880 | 236 | |||||
| Diligent diligent.com Diligent One Platform 2% | 2% | 59 | 165,000 | 6,449 | 317,551 company | $287 | 120 | 6 |
| BlackLine blackline.com | 2% | 425 | 27,100 | 1,255 | 28,740 | $4,066 | 79 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (highradius.com, optro.ai, v-comply.com). The first result for “best sox compliance software” is zluri.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best SOX compliance software for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which internal controls management tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade internal controls tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best SOX compliance software for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a SOX compliance software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which internal controls tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5HighRadiusno first choiceChangedAuditBoardWorkivano first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
AuditBoard, BlackLine, Diligent One Platform, MetricStreamFour alternatives
AuditBoard, MetricStream, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, WorkivaTwo alternatives
MetricStream, WorkivaTwo alternatives
Diligent One Platform, MetricStreamGPT-5.4 miniWorkivaMetricStreamChangedagainst: VantaAuditBoardOptrono first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
AuditBoard, OpenPages, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementOne alternative
WorkivaSeven alternatives
Archer, LogicGate Risk Cloud, MetricStream, Oracle GRC, Riskonnect, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, WorkivaThree alternatives
IBM OpenPages, SAP Risk Management, TeamMateGemini 3.5 FlashOptroagainst: ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementOptroHeldOptroOptro, WorkivaOptroagainst: Google Sheets, Microsoft Excel, SharePoint
Two alternatives
Pathlock, WorkivaThree alternatives
MetricStream, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, WorkivaFour alternatives
Archer, MetricStream, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, WorkivaFour alternatives
MetricStream, Pathlock, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, WorkivaPerplexity SonarSAP GRCMetricStreamChangedAuditBoard, TeamMate ControlsSAP GRCagainst: AuditBoard, Optro, Workivano first choiceagainst: Alteryx, Excel macros, Spreadsheets
Five alternatives
AuditBoard, HighRadius, MetricStream, Optro, WorkivaTwo alternatives
AuditBoard, WorkivaThree alternatives
MetricStream, Resolver, SprintoOne alternative
MetricStreamGrok 4.1 FastAuditBoard, WorkivaAuditBoardChangedno first choiceAuditBoardagainst: Drata, Sprinto, VantaAuditBoardagainst: Google Sheets, Microsoft Excel, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management
Three alternatives
BlackLine, Diligent One Platform, MetricStreamThree alternatives
Archer, MetricStream, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementFour alternatives
LogicGate Risk Cloud, MetricStream, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, WorkivaTwo alternatives
Drata, HyperproofMistral SmallHyperproof, MetricStreamAuditBoardChangedMetricStreamagainst: ArcherSmartSuite SOX Managementagainst: BlackLine, ServiceNow Governance, Risk, and Complianceno first choiceagainst: MetricStream, Oracle SOX Compliance Manager, SAP GRCnothing named
Two alternatives
BlackLine, OptroTwo alternatives
MetricStream, SprintoTwo alternatives
AuditBoard, OneTrust GRCOne alternative
WorkivaDeepSeek V4 FlashOptroAuditBoardChangedOptro, WorkivaWorkivaagainst: LogicGate Risk CloudAuditBoard, Optro, Workivaagainst: FloQastagainst: Archer, Google Sheets, Microsoft Excel
Four alternatives
BlackLine, MetricStream, SAP GRC, WorkivaThree alternatives
MetricStream, TeamMate, WorkivaSix alternatives
Archer, Diligent One Platform, MetricStream, Pathlock, SAP GRC, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementThree alternatives
AuditBoard, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, SmartSuite SOX ManagementOne alternative
BlackLineLlama 4 MaverickAuditBoardno first choiceChangedno first choiceOptro, Pathlock, WorkivaOptronothing named
Two alternatives
BlackLine, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementTwo alternatives
Hyperproof, VantaQwen 3.7 FlashOptroAuditBoardChangedAuditBoard, Vantaagainst: IBM OpenPagesSAI360no first choiceagainst: Microsoft Excel
Four alternatives
BlackLine, HighRadius, MetricStream, OneTrust GRCFour alternatives
Drata, Galvanize Archer, OneTrust GRC, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementThree alternatives
Diligent One Platform, SAP GRC, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementTwo alternatives
AuditBoard, WorkivaKimi K2AuditBoard, WorkivaDiligent One Platform, MetricStreamChangedMetricStreamSmartSuite SOX Management, ZenGRCagainst: LogicGate Risk Cloud, MetricStream, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementAuditBoard, LogicGate Risk Cloud, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Managementnothing named
One alternative
SAP GRCThree alternatives
AuditBoard, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, WorkivaSix alternatives
AuditBoard, IBM OpenPages, LogicGate Risk Cloud, SAP Process Control, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, WorkivaTwo alternatives
Optro, WorkivaOne alternative
PathlockGLM 4.7 FlashXIBM OpenPagesAuditBoardChangedAuditBoard, Diligent One PlatformComplies.ai, Optroagainst: Workivano first choiceagainst: Google Sheets, Microsoft Excel
Three alternatives
AuditBoard, Diligent One Platform, WorkivaFour alternatives
Diligent One Platform, MetricStream, TeamMate, WorkivaFour alternatives
LogicManager, MetricStream, Pathlock, WorkivaOne alternative
Diligent One PlatformMiniMax M2.5no first choiceAuditBoard, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementChangedAuditBoardSmartSuite SOX ManagementPathlocknothing named
Two alternatives
Archer, SAP Process ControlFour alternatives
MetricStream, Oracle Risk Management Cloud, SAP GRC, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementThree alternatives
AuditBoard, Hyperproof, OptroTwo alternatives
Optro, ZluriGPT-6 LunaOptroAuditBoardChangedOptro, WorkivaSmartSuite SOX Managementno first choicenothing named
One alternative
WorkivaThree alternatives
Diligent One Platform, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, WorkivaFour alternatives
Diligent One Platform, IBM OpenPages, SAP Risk and Assurance Management / SAP GRC, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementTwo alternatives
Optro, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementOne alternative
ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementMuse Glimmer 30BBlackLine, Optro, WorkivaMetricStreamChangedMetricStreamWorkivaagainst: AuditBoard, OptroFloQastagainst: Microsoft Excel, Supervizor
One alternative
RiskonnectTwo alternatives
Archer Evolv by RSA, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementFour alternatives
AuditBoard — now branded Optro, SAP GRC, SAP Process Control, WorkivaThree alternatives
AuditBoard, BlackLine, WorkivaBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:07 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:26 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:01 | yes | 19 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:06 | yes | 19 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:12 | yes | 23 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:05 | yes | 8 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:44 | yes | 22 | 52 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:07 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:38 | yes | 10 | 44 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:10 | yes | 9 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:10 | yes | 23 | 33 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:13 | yes | 5 | 13 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:03 | yes | 4 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:21 | yes | 20 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:50 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:44 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 07:58 | yes | 11 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:38 | yes | 16 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:59 | yes | 23 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:57 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:10 | yes | 23 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:30 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:45 | no | 0 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:57 | yes | 14 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:54 | yes | 17 | 49 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 07:55 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:34 | yes | 3 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:29 | yes | 14 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:08 | yes | 17 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:15 | yes | 6 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:01 | yes | 24 | 30 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:40 | yes | 11 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:01 | yes | 24 | 12 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:39 | yes | 11 | 9 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:18 | yes | 21 | 43 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:32 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:46 | no | 0 | 32 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 07:58 | yes | 25 | 23 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:34 | yes | 23 | 41 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 07:41 | yes | 19 | 28 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:59 | yes | 7 | 19 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:27 | yes | 20 | 31 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:51 | yes | 18 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:26 | yes | 4 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:56 | yes | 22 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:24 | yes | 19 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:36 | yes | 22 | 11 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:23 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:14 | yes | 22 | 45 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:04 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:44 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:43 | yes | 24 | 39 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:01 | yes | 20 | 41 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:25 | yes | 19 | 44 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:08 | yes | 2 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:46 | yes | 22 | 36 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 07:32 | yes | 18 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:21 | yes | 6 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:03 | yes | 9 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:05 | yes | 14 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:33 | yes | 16 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:12 | no | 0 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:15 | yes | 21 | 49 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:47 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:47 | yes | 10 | 54 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:38 | yes | 21 | 36 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:02 | yes | 22 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:21 | yes | 5 | 39 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:22 | yes | 3 | 33 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 07:32 | yes | 13 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:14 | yes | 15 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:24 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:53 | yes | 11 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:07 | yes | 15 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:30 | yes | 21 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:19 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:06 | yes | 18 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:12 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:20 | yes | 15 | 35 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:07 | yes | 25 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:16 | yes | 20 | 60 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:31 | yes | 20 | 62 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:42 | yes | 6 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:18 | yes | 16 | 29 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Diligent read as Diligent One Platform
Diligent (One Platform / HighBond) read as Diligent One Platform
Diligent (formerly HighBond / Galvanize) read as Diligent One Platform
Excel read as Microsoft Excel
LogicGate read as LogicGate Risk Cloud
OneTrust read as OneTrust GRC
ServiceNow read as ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management
ServiceNow GRC read as ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management
ServiceNow GRC (Governance, Risk, & Compliance) read as ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management
ServiceNow GRC (IRM) read as ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management
ServiceNow GRC (Integrated Risk Management - IRM) read as ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management
ServiceNow GRC (Integrated Risk Management) read as ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management
SmartSuite read as SmartSuite SOX Management
Unresolved, counted raw
Archer Evolv by RSA
AuditBoard — now branded Optro
Excel macros
Galvanize Archer (formerly SAI Global)
IBM OpenPages with watsonx
Oracle Risk Management Cloud
Oracle SOX Compliance Manager
SAP Risk Management
SAP Risk and Assurance Management / SAP GRC
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.