Internal controls and SOX
Asked as “SOX compliance software”, and as “internal controls management tool”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 51 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
25%
Contested · AuditBoard 12%
25FloQast12AuditBoard06ControlHatch57others
25% of first choices, contested.
Since September 2026↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: FloQast (27%) replaces AuditBoard (18% then, 13% now), 13 points clear, past the 10-point floor.FloQast leads at 27%, replacing AuditBoard, which led at 18% and stands at 13% now: 13 points clear, past the floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Vanta14%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Drata (13%) replaces Complies.ai (14% then, 6% now), 6 points clear, inside the 10-point floor.Standing →Mid-market
FloQast25%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: FloQast (27%) replaces AuditBoard (18% then, 13% now), 13 points clear, past the 10-point floor.This pageEnterprise
AuditBoard23%Contested=heldSince September 2026: 25% → 25%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →
Vanta14%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Drata (13%) replaces Complies.ai (14% then, 6% now), 6 points clear, inside the 10-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketFloQast25%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: FloQast (27%) replaces AuditBoard (18% then, 13% now), 13 points clear, past the 10-point floor.This pageEnterpriseAuditBoard23%Contested=heldSince September 2026: 25% → 25%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01FloQast25%4%28accepted challenger▲+9Since September 2026: 18% → 27%, +9 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.18% → 27%
FloQast25%4%28accepted challenger▲+9Since September 2026: 18% → 27%, +9 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.18% → 27%02AuditBoard12%24%33accepted challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 18% → 13%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.18% → 13%
AuditBoard12%24%33accepted challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 18% → 13%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.18% → 13%03
Sprinto6%0%15accepted challenger▲+7Since September 2026: 0% → 7%, +7 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 7%
Sprinto6%0%15accepted challenger▲+7Since September 2026: 0% → 7%, +7 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 7%04
Onspring6%0%14accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 7%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 7%
Onspring6%0%14accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 7%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 7%05
Optro6%27%15criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 2%
Optro6%27%15criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 2%06
Hyperproof4%0%14accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 2%
Hyperproof4%0%14accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 2%07
Scytale2%9%11accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Scytale2%9%11accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%08
Drata2%18%17accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
Drata2%18%17accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%09
BlackLine2%9%11accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
BlackLine2%9%11accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%Show the seven products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
16
MetricStream0%28%18criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
MetricStream0%28%18criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%10
Workiva0%26%42criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%
Workiva0%26%42criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%15
Archer0%20%10accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%
Archer0%20%10accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%12
ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management0%17%18accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management0%17%18accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%14Vanta0%17%18accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%
Vanta0%17%18accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%11
Diligent One Platform0%11%19accepted challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 0%
Diligent One Platform0%11%19accepted challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 0%13
LogicGate Risk Cloud0%0%11accepted challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 0%
LogicGate Risk Cloud0%0%11accepted challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 0%The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
FloQast vs OptroFloQast vs HyperproofFloQast vs ScytaleFloQast vs DrataAuditBoard vs SprintoAuditBoard vs OnspringAuditBoard vs OptroAuditBoard vs HyperproofAuditBoard vs ScytaleAuditBoard vs DrataSprinto vs OnspringSprinto vs OptroSprinto vs HyperproofSprinto vs ScytaleSprinto vs DrataOnspring vs OptroOnspring vs HyperproofOnspring vs ScytaleOnspring vs DrataOptro vs HyperproofOptro vs ScytaleOptro vs DrataHyperproof vs ScytaleHyperproof vs DrataScytale vs Drata
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01020304050607080910111213141516Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01FloQast25%
FloQast25%02AuditBoard12%
AuditBoard12%03Sprinto6%
Sprinto6%04Onspring6%
Onspring6%05Optro6%
Optro6%06Hyperproof4%
Hyperproof4%07Scytale2%
Scytale2%08Drata2%
Drata2%09BlackLine2%
BlackLine2%10Workiva0%
Workiva0%11Diligent One Platform0%
Diligent One Platform0%12ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management0%
ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management0%13LogicGate Risk Cloud0%
LogicGate Risk Cloud0%14Vanta0%
Vanta0%15Archer0%
Archer0%16MetricStream0%
MetricStream0%What they warned about
One of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Workiva26%
11 of 42 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“avoid platforms like Workiva, MetricStream, or IBM OpenPages, as they can be overkill and too expensive” MiniMax M2.5, paraphrase prompt
AuditBoard24%
8 of 33 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“What to Avoid on a Budget - **AuditBoard/Optro** \u2014 custom pricing, typically enterprise-level” DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt
MetricStream28%
5 of 18 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Enterprise-grade solutions that require significant implementation resources and budget.” Kimi K2, paraphrase prompt
Microsoft Excel80%
4 of 5 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Avoid using shared Excel files where multiple users have "Edit" access simultaneously. This overwrites audit trails and allows unauthorized changes.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
76 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 965 links across 213 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 28 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
32 answers · 32 citations · 10 models
vendor site · RiskWatch29 answers · 41 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Optro29 answers · 34 citations · 11 models
26 answers · 40 citations · 10 models
26 answers · 33 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Sprinto26 answers · 27 citations · 12 models
23 answers · 30 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Worldmetrics22 answers · 31 citations · 11 models
21 answers · 31 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Mitti21 answers · 25 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Supervizor20 answers · 21 citations · 9 models
vendor site · MetricStream18 answers · 20 citations · 10 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
31 answers · 10 models
23 answers · 12 models
19 answers · 9 models
15 answers · 8 models
15 answers · 10 models
14 answers · 6 models
14 answers · 9 models
13 answers · 9 models
13 answers · 10 models
13 answers · 9 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best sox compliance software”, “internal controls tools”, “sox compliance software”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FloQast floqast.com | 25% | 377 | 9,900 | 194 | 41,324 | $5,039 | 76 | |
| AuditBoard auditboard.com | 12% | 94 | 8,100 | 220 | 129 | 0 | ||
| Sprinto sprinto.com | 6% | 39 | 2,400 | 79 | 26,896 | 43 | ||
| Onspring onspring.com | 6% | 24 | 1,300 | 25 | 7,536 | 24 | ||
| Optro optro.ai | 6% | 48 | 2,900 | 39 | 126,117 | $4,599 | 75 | 4 |
| ControlHatch controlhatch.com | 6% | 17 | 0 | |||||
| Mitti mitti.com | 6% | 12 | 1,900 | 3,885 | 268,513 | 48 | 4 | |
| SmartSuite SOX Management smartsuite.com | 6% | 27 | 0 | 19,550 | 0 | |||
| Hyperproof hyperproof.io | 4% | 43 | 1,600 | 37 | 64,238 | $59 | 34 | |
| Complies.ai complies.ai | 4% | 13 | 0 | 72 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (mitti.com, optro.ai, v-comply.com). The first result for “best sox compliance software” is zluri.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best SOX compliance software for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which internal controls management tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top internal controls tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best SOX compliance software for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a SOX compliance software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which internal controls tools should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceAuditBoardChangedno first choiceProcessGene GRC Softwareno first choicenothing named
Five alternatives
BlackLine, FloQast, HighRadius, LogicGate Risk Cloud, ScytaleThree alternatives
LogicManager, VComply, WorkivaTwo alternatives
Mitti, OnspringGPT-5.4 miniAuditBoardTeamMate ControlsChangedDiligent Internal Controls / Diligent OneSecureframe, Sprintoagainst: AuditBoard, Workivano first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Vanta, WorkivaTwo alternatives
Drata, SprintoTwo alternatives
AuditBoard, WorkivaTwo alternatives
AuditRunner, DrataGemini 3.5 FlashOptroAuditBoardChangedagainst: Archer, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementOptroSprintoagainst: AuditBoard, WorkivaAuditBoardagainst: Drata, Scytale, Vantaagainst: Google Sheets, Jira, Microsoft Excel, Monday.com, Trello
Five alternatives
FloQast, Pathlock, Scytale, Vanta, WorkivaSix alternatives
Drata, HighRadius, Hyperproof, LogicGate Risk Cloud, Sprinto, VantaFive alternatives
Diligent One Platform, MetricStream, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, Sprinto, WorkivaSix alternatives
Drata, Eramba, Mitti, Scrut Automation, Soxify, VantaThree alternatives
Diligent One Platform, FloQast, WorkivaPerplexity SonarFloQastTeamMate ControlsChangedno first choiceSprintoagainst: Archer, Workivano first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Netwrix Auditor, Optro, ScytaleThree alternatives
MetricStream, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, SprintoTwo alternatives
Mitti, Netwrix AuditorGrok 4.1 FastFloQastagainst: Diligent One Platform, MetricStreamOnspringChangedAuditBoardComplies.ai, ControlHatchagainst: BlackLine, Diligent One Platform, LogicManager, Optro, Workivano first choiceagainst: Spreadsheets
Two alternatives
AuditBoard, BlackLineFour alternatives
Camms Internal Controls, Hyperproof, LogicManager, SprintoSeven alternatives
Archer, Diligent One Platform, MetricStream, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, TeamMate, VComply, WorkivaOne alternative
SmartSuite SOX ManagementMistral SmallAuditBoard, FloQastLogicManager, OnspringChangedVantaMitti, SmartSuite SOX Managementno first choiceagainst: IBM OpenPages, Jira, Microsoft Excel, SAP GRC, Trello
Two alternatives
Complies.ai, ScytaleOne alternative
SprintoSeven alternatives
Diligent One Platform, MetricStream, Pathlock, SAP Audit Management, Secureframe, Sprinto, WorkivaTwo alternatives
ControlHatch, Microsoft Power AutomateDeepSeek V4 FlashFloQastagainst: SAP GRCZenGRCChangedagainst: Drata, VantaAuditBoard, WorkivaSmartSuite SOX Managementagainst: AuditBoard, Drata, FloQast, Optro, Vanta, WorkivaFloQast, Hyperproofagainst: SAP GRC, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Managementnothing named
Three alternatives
BlackLine, Hyperproof, WorkivaThree alternatives
Optro, TeamMate, WorkivaFour alternatives
Diligent One Platform, MetricStream, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, SupervizorTwo alternatives
ControlHatch, ManageEngine Log360Two alternatives
AuditBoard, WorkivaLlama 4 MaverickFloQast, Scytaleno first choiceChangedno first choiceBlackLineagainst: MetricStream, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Managementno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Pathlock, SAP Audit Management, SprintoTwo alternatives
IBM OpenPages Cloud Pak, RiskWatchQwen 3.7 FlashFloQastagainst: Deloitte’s Monitor products, MetricStream, OneTrust GRCLogicManagerChangedAuditBoardDrata, Mittiagainst: AuditBoardno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Excel
Two alternatives
AuditBoard, ScytaleFour alternatives
ControlCase, Onspring, VComply, WorkivaFour alternatives
Diligent One Platform, MetricSuite, OneTrust GRC, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementOne alternative
FloQastKimi K2FloQastFloQastHeldagainst: AuditBoard, MetricStream, SAP Audit Management, Workivano first choiceagainst: TeamMateFloQastno first choiceagainst: AuditBoard, Microsoft Excel, Optro, Workiva
Three alternatives
Hyperproof, Onspring, WorkivaFour alternatives
Hyperproof, LogicGate Risk Cloud, Onspring, ZenGRCEight alternatives
AuditBoard, Hyperproof, LogicGate Risk Cloud, Onspring, Oracle GRC, SAP GRC, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, WorkivaThree alternatives
ControlHatch, Hyperproof, OnspringGLM 4.7 FlashXFloQastAuditBoardChangedno first choiceControlHatch, Mittiagainst: AuditBoard, Workivano first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Hyperproof, NAVEX One, Onspring, WorkivaFive alternatives
Diligent One Platform, FloQast, LogicGate Risk Cloud, Secureframe, WorkivaSeven alternatives
Archer, LogicGate Risk Cloud, MetricStream Enterprise GRC, Optro, RiskWatch, SAP Process Control, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementFive alternatives
BlackLine, Deloitte – SOXwise, Diligent One Platform, FloQast, Sensiba – SOX QuestMiniMax M2.5FloQastOnspringChangedagainst: IBM OpenPages, MetricStream, Workivano first choiceControlHatchagainst: AuditBoard, Workivano first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
AuditBoard, WorkivaThree alternatives
AuditBoard, StandardFusion, TeamMateTwo alternatives
Microsoft Power Automate, SmartSuite SOX ManagementGPT-6 LunaOptroHyperproofChangedOptroagainst: IBM OpenPagesSmartSuite SOX Managementagainst: Soxifyno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
FloQast, WorkivaTwo alternatives
AuditBoard, VantaFour alternatives
Diligent One Platform, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, Wolters Kluwer TeamMate Controls, WorkivaTwo alternatives
Optro, WorkivaMuse Glimmer 30BFloQastOptroChangedOptroComplies.aiagainst: Optro, Workivano first choicenothing named
Five alternatives
AuditBoard, HighRadius, Hyperproof, Onspring, ScytaleFour alternatives
Drata, Scytale, VComply, WorkivaFour alternatives
Archer, Diligent One Platform, MetricStream, WorkivaTwo alternatives
ControlHatch, FloQastBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:01 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:06 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 07:30 | yes | 19 | 31 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:46 | yes | 17 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:51 | yes | 23 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:08 | yes | 12 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:02 | yes | 9 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:59 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:59 | yes | 7 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:32 | yes | 13 | 18 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:19 | yes | 13 | 72 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:23 | yes | 9 | 13 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:33 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:39 | yes | 12 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:23 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:09 | yes | 2 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:18 | yes | 11 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:05 | yes | 17 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:31 | yes | 24 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 07:48 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:08 | yes | 25 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:13 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 07:43 | yes | 10 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:04 | yes | 23 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:41 | yes | 15 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:22 | yes | 14 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:17 | yes | 3 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:04 | yes | 14 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:28 | yes | 16 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:26 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:51 | yes | 11 | 27 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:56 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:59 | yes | 21 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:15 | yes | 12 | 11 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:11 | yes | 19 | 41 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:26 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 07:59 | no | 0 | 33 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 07:44 | yes | 19 | 29 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:58 | yes | 25 | 83 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:03 | yes | 17 | 62 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:35 | yes | 8 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:35 | yes | 14 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:24 | yes | 9 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:51 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:57 | yes | 20 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:38 | yes | 17 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:51 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:50 | yes | 8 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:31 | yes | 19 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:22 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:07 | yes | 9 | 48 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:11 | yes | 16 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:42 | yes | 20 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:52 | yes | 12 | 31 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:56 | yes | 3 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 07:51 | yes | 11 | 37 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:21 | yes | 18 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:31 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 07:38 | yes | 11 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:18 | yes | 16 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 07:41 | yes | 16 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:59 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:29 | yes | 22 | 39 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:10 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:06 | yes | 8 | 63 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:27 | yes | 15 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:36 | yes | 10 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:15 | yes | 10 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:58 | yes | 3 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:15 | yes | 12 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:55 | no | 0 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:22 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:00 | yes | 20 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:17 | yes | 18 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:51 | yes | 14 | 13 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 07:53 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:07 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:08 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 07:40 | no | 0 | 36 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:16 | yes | 15 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:36 | yes | 25 | 67 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:28 | no | 0 | 57 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:15 | yes | 5 | 12 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:23 | yes | 15 | 25 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Bill.com read as BILL
Diligent read as Diligent One Platform
Excel read as Microsoft Excel
LogicGate read as LogicGate Risk Cloud
LogicGate (Risk Cloud) read as LogicGate Risk Cloud
Netwrix read as Netwrix Auditor
OneTrust read as OneTrust GRC
ServiceNow GRC read as ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management
ServiceNow GRC (Integrated Risk Management) read as ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management
SmartSuite read as SmartSuite SOX Management
Unresolved, counted raw
Appperian
AuditRunner
BWise
Camms Internal Controls
ControlCase
ControlScan
Cyber Sierra
Deloitte – SOXwise
Deloitte’s Monitor products
Diligent Internal Controls / Diligent One
Eramba
IBM OpenPages Cloud Pak
MetricStream Enterprise GRC
MetricSuite (by MetricStream)
Okta
OpenGRC
ProcessGene GRC Software
RiskWatch SOX Compliance
SAI360 SOX Compliance
SAP GRC Access Control
SAP or Oracle controls tools
Scrut
Sensiba – SOX Quest
Wolters Kluwer TeamMate Controls
iShield GRC
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.