Mid-marketgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsNot ranked
2 categories · Named, not rankedActerys
3Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
3 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Acterys was named 2 times in AI accounting assistants and 1 other category, where Sage Intacct led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market59 of 85
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In ai accounting assistants · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Acterys for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI accounting assistants | Accounting and close | 0% | 59 of 85 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 22% | goneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026. |
| Corporate performance management | Planning and analysis | 0% | 33 of 99 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Planful at 22% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Acterys held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · AI accounting assistants · by segment
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI accounting assistants | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 49 → 59 of 85 |
| Corporate performance ma | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 33 of 99, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Acterys across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Acterys across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“From ~$168/month ... affordable budgeting, scenario modeling, consolidation for Microsoft users.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Corporate performance ma · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Acterys, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Acterys was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Acterys, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Acterys was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Acterys. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 3 answers that named Acterys and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
resources.rework.com2
thecfoclub.com2
worldmetrics.org2
acterys.comYour site1
alphabold.com1
awesomeagents.ai1
board.com1
centage.com1
cfoshortlist.com1
cubesoftware.com1
Twelve of the thirteen domain citations in answers naming Acterys came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on acterys.com
489
subdomains included
Content
414
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
20 · 4
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 248 | 2 | 2026-09-22 | ||
| Podcast or video | 76 | 0 | 2026-06-25 | ||
| Conference or event | 32 | 1 | 2026-07-17 | ||
| Case study | 25 | 2 | 2026-09-02 | ||
| Report or ebook | 18 | 0 | 2026-04-27 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 9 | 0 | 2026-06-08 | ||
| Comparison | 3 | 0 | 2026-04-07 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 2 | 0 | 2026-04-24 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-22Vena and acterys recognized as leaders blog
- 2026-09-02Pacific ag rentals case study
- 2026-08-01F5 brings workforce planning into power bi with acterys case study
- 2026-07-23Ai spend management why visibility isnt control blog
- 2026-07-17From ai spend visibility to consumption control how finance and it can optimize token costs with write back in power bi conference or event
- 2026-06-25Turn power bi from a read only dashboard into a planning app writeback use cases ep 1 podcast or video
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page acterys.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Acterys
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Acterys is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Acterys is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Enterprise Data Planning & Data Intelligence Solutions
- For
- CFOs, finance professionals, data leaders, and departmental teams across enterprises and SMBs
- Free plan or trial
- book a demo or start with a guided setup acterys.com
- Certifications
- Acterys Certified Partner
- Customers named
- Pacific Ag RentalsF5Montego Pet NutritionAMAGBlackmoresSuperior Plus PropaneMicrosoftFortune 500 companies
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, integrations, hosting
What Acterys's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: acterys.com, acterys.com/pricing, acterys.com/products/smart-xl, acterys.com/customers, acterys.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Acterys's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Acterys, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Acterys by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Acterys is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Acterys, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.