Small business▼−6Since September 2026: 16% → 10%, −6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
10%from 16% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 4 pointsRank 3 → 4 of 51
6 categories · RankedERPNext
45Judge labels
17First choices
5Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
6Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
16% in ERP systems for mid-market buyers
Rank 3 of 73 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 12 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of ERPNext →By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
Small business4 of 56
12%26 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market3 of 73
16%12 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In erp systems · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named ERPNext for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERP systems | Accounting and close | 16% | 3 of 73 | 0% | 12 | accepted challenger | ▲+3Since September 2026: 11% → 14%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Supplier management | Spend and procurement | 2% | 20 of 111 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Precoro at 14% | goneNot named this edition; 2% in September 2026. |
| Procure-to-pay | Spend and procurement | 2% | 14 of 87 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Procurify at 42% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Corporate performance management | Planning and analysis | 0% | 82 of 99 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Planful at 22% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Fixed asset accounting | Accounting and close | 0% | 38 of 107 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Fixed Assets at 34% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Treasury management systems | Treasury and cash | 0% | 90 of 124 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Trovata at 28% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, ERPNext held within the floor in all six categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · ERP systems · by segment
Mid-market▲+3Since September 2026: 11% → 14%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
14%from 11% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 5 → 3 of 63
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsNot ranked
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERP systems | 11% | 14% | ▲+3Since September 2026: 11% → 14%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 5 → 3 of 73 |
| Supplier management | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 13 → 20 of 111 |
| Procure-to-pay | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 34 → 14 of 87 |
| Corporate performance ma | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 83 → 82 of 99 |
| Fixed asset accounting | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 45 → 38 of 107 |
| Treasury management syst | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 90 of 124, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated ERPNext across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated ERPNext across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative9 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained30 labels17
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative45 labels in all, every segment counted; 17 of the 19 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“ERPNext (The Open-Source Champion) * Best for: Companies with a limited budget but some technical/IT capabilities.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ERP systems · budget prompt · first choice
“ERPNext (Fully Open-Source, Often Ranked #1 for Free ERPs)... Why best for tight budgets? Completely free to self-host” Grok 4.1 Fast · ERP systems · budget prompt · first choice
“if you genuinely need to spend zero on licensing, ERPNext is the most complete truly-free option available.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · ERP systems · budget prompt · first choice
“For the tightest budget with decent functionality, ERPNext or Odoo (open-source) are excellent choices” MiniMax M2.5 · ERP systems · budget prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“open-source (e.g., basic ERPNext modules), but they lack robust EPM features” Grok 4.1 Fast · Corporate performance ma · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ERPNext, over the 45 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ERPNext was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ERPNext, over the 45 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ERPNext was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ERPNext. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 44 of the 45 answers that named ERPNext and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
erpresearch.com31
cin7.com20
randgroup.com18
gushwork.ai16
erp-pilot.com13
forbes.com12
dynamicssquare.com10
g2.com10
odoo.com10
softwareconnect.com10
150 of the 150 domain citations in answers naming ERPNext came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
erpnext.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, ERPNext takes 16% of first choices and Oracle NetSuite takes 39%.ShowHide
Search and answers
erpnext.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, ERPNext takes 16% of first choices and Oracle NetSuite takes 39%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “erp system”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “erp systems”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 5,400 a month (“erpnext”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 128 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 1,862 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 227 · 8 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 4,276
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
16%
rank 3 of 73 in ERP systems
Segment leader
39%
Oracle NetSuite
- First choices
- 17 across its categories
- Named in
- 45 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 44 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on erpnext.com
1,994
subdomains included
Content
1,141
counted in the table below
Documentation
15
Product · Integration
1 · 163
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 830 | 9 | 2026-10-01 | Accounting software | |
| Case study | 125 | 1 | 2026-07-13 | ERP systems | |
| News or press | 84 | 0 | 2024-07-22 | ||
| Conference or event | 35 | 2 | 2026-08-26 | ||
| Comparison | 31 | 0 | 2025-08-28 | ||
| Report or ebook | 17 | 0 | 2023-05-11 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 13 | 0 | 2025-12-26 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 6 | 0 | 2020-06-29 |
Most recent
- 2026-10-01Product updates for september 2026 blog
- 2026-10-01Introducing frappe ui 1 blog
- 2026-09-22Its not just about you blog
- 2026-09-15Conversations make the ecosystem blog
- 2026-09-03Half a billion ledger entries blog
- 2026-09-01Product updates for august 2026 blog
Events in person
Last twelve months
- August 21, 2026 to August 22, 2026Frappeverse 2026Nehru Center, Mumbai, India · took part
- April 3, 2026 to April 4, 2026Frappe Build 2026The Mysore Association, Mumbai, India · hosted
- October 7, 2025 to October 9, 2025Global Fintech Fest 2025Jio Convention Centre, Mumbai · exhibited
As the event pages on erpnext.com state them, read October 5, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page erpnext.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.
Follow ERPNext
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
ERPNext is its own company.ShowHide
The company
ERPNext is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Open Source Cloud ERP Software
- For
- small and medium businesses
- Price stated
- No per-user pricing; pay only for hosting frappe.io/erpnext
- Starting price
- 0 frappe.io/erpnext
- Free plan or trial
- Start free trial frappe.io/erpnext
- Certifications
- product-certifiedcertified partners
- Customers named
- Navari LimitedWoodbergFurnishkaKyi Myanmar TradingAung Thit Lwin TradingEnvision Enviro TechSolid DevelopmentParikh Power
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, hosting
What ERPNext's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: frappe.io/erpnext, erpnext.com, erpnext.com/pricing, erpnext.com/security, erpnext.com/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ERPNext's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ERPNext, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ERPNext by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where ERPNext is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name ERPNext, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where ERPNext is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where ERPNext is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideERPNext is among the products AI models recommend first in ERP systems this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.