AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Accounting and close › AI accounting assistants › Enterprise › October 2026 Edition

AI accounting assistants for enterprise buyers

Asked as “AI bookkeeping tool”, and as “AI agent for accounting tasks”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 54 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
15%
Contested · Vic.ai 15%
15Sage Intacct15Vic.ai13BlackLine57others

15% of first choices, contested.

Since September 2026▲+5Since September 2026: 12% → 17%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Vic.ai held the lead, +5 points on 12%, inside the 10-point floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Vic.ai15%7%41accepted challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 12% → 17%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.12% → 17%
02Sage Intacct15%6%31accepted challenger▲+10Since September 2026: 7% → 17%, +10 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 17%
03BlackLine13%0%25accepted challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 10% → 13%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.10% → 13%
04Oracle NetSuite13%7%27accepted challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 10% → 15%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.10% → 15%
05Rillet6%20%10accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
06Numeric4%15%20accepted challenger▼−3Since September 2026: 7% → 4%, −3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 4%
Show the six products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
12Xero0%86%14criticized challenger▼−5Since September 2026: 5% → 0%, −5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 0%
11QuickBooks Online0%76%17criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
10BILL0%25%16criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
09Ramp Accounting Agent0%6%16accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%
07FloQast0%4%23accepted challenger▼−7Since September 2026: 7% → 0%, −7 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 0%
08Trullion0%0%13accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative30%
Key
01Vic.ai15%
02Sage Intacct15%
03BlackLine13%
04Oracle NetSuite13%
05Rillet6%
06Numeric4%
07FloQast0%
08Trullion0%
09Ramp Accounting Agent0%
10BILL0%
11QuickBooks Online0%
12Xero0%

What they warned about

Zero of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
QuickBooks Online
76%
13 of 17 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 8 hard negative
“"platforms to avoid or scrutinize closely if you need full cloud-native infrastructure, multi-entity consolidated reporting, or full ERP capabilities"26*” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Xero
86%
12 of 14 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 7 hard negative
“Xero is built for single-entity accounting... per-entity subscriptions scale poorly and create data silos for a group.” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
ChatGPT
100%
4 of 4 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Generic LLMs for Core Accounting (e.g., ChatGPT, Claude) ... should **never** be used to close books or process financial data directly.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Claude
100%
4 of 4 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Generic LLMs for Core Accounting (e.g., ChatGPT, Claude) ... should **never** be used to close books or process financial data directly.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt

What they cite

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.

Sites the answers cite

81 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1176 links across 342 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 4 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

vendor site · Numeric36 answers · 58 citations · 12 models
32 answers · 46 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Ramp32 answers · 41 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Maxima31 answers · 40 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Rillet31 answers · 40 citations · 12 models
25 answers · 40 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Fast.io24 answers · 25 citations · 11 models
vendor site · DualEntry23 answers · 24 citations · 11 models
22 answers · 22 citations · 9 models
22 answers · 22 citations · 9 models
20 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Trullion15 answers · 21 citations · 9 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “ai accounting tools”, “ai bookkeeping tool”, “best ai bookkeeping tool”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 days
Vic.ai vic.ai15%9372001,2511
Sage sage.com
Sage Intacct 15%
15%433246,00090,5991,737,127 company$114,67178
BlackLine blackline.com
BlackLine 13%, BlackLine Agentic Financial Operations with Verity AI 2%
15%42527,1001,25528,740$4,06679
Oracle parent site
Oracle NetSuite 13%
13%489450,00066,611
Rillet rillet.com6%398,1001684,712$4,77656
SAP Concur sap.com
SAP S/4HANA 4%, SAP Concur 2%
6%41474,0005022,214,514$1,25123
Numeric numeric.io4%21812,10038,00694,254$4269
Maxima maxima.ai4%12
Docyt docyt.com4%31720759921
Lunos AI lunos.ai4%61621

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 22 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (dualentry.com, intuit.com). The first result for “ai accounting tools” is finlens.app.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best AI bookkeeping tool for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which AI agent for accounting tasks would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade AI accounting tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best AI bookkeeping tool for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating an AI bookkeeping tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which AI accounting tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Docyt, Vic.ai
One alternativeSage Intacct
BlackLine, Vic.aiChanged
Two alternativesHighRadius, Trullion
FloQast
Four alternativesBlackLine, Oracle Fusion, Sage Intacct, Vic.ai
Oracle NetSuite, Sage Intacctno first choicenothing named
GPT-5.4 miniOracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Two alternativesBlackLine, HighRadius
against: Docyt
Workday Accounting Agent, Workday Financial ManagementChanged
One alternativeOpenAI-based enterprise workflows
against: Basis
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Eight alternativesConsarc, Intuit Enterprise Suite, Ledge, Maxima, Revzio, Sage Intacct, Workday Financial Management, Zip
Intuit Enterprise Suiteagainst: BILL, QuickBooks Desktop, QuickBooks Onlineno first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.5 FlashRillet
Six alternativesCampfire, Double, Oracle NetSuite, Ramp Accounting Agent, Truewind, Vic.ai
against: QuickBooks Online, Xero
NumericChanged
Three alternativesLedge, Trullion, Vic.ai
no first choiceDocyt, Vic.ai
Three alternativesDooap Studio, Noxus, Yooz
no first choicenothing named
Perplexity SonarSage Intacct, Zeni
Two alternativesOracle NetSuite, Pilot
Vic.aiChanged
Three alternativesBlackLine, FloQast, Numeric
against: BILL
Sage Intacct
Five alternativesNumeric, Ramp Accounting Agent, Rillet, Trullion, Vic.ai
against: BILL, Docyt
Sage Intacct
Three alternativesDocyt, Oracle NetSuite, Zeni
against: Botkeeper, Digits
no first choicenothing named
Grok 4.1 FastOracle NetSuite
Four alternativesBILL, Ramp Accounting Agent, Sage Intacct, Vic.ai
against: Digits, Numeric
BlackLineChanged
Two alternativesRamp Accounting Agent, Vic.ai
against: Digits
Sage Intacct, Vic.ai
Three alternativesFloQast, Stampli, Zone & Co
Oracle NetSuite
One alternativeSage Intacct
against: BILL, Booke AI, Botkeeper, Digits, Numeric, QuickBooks Online, Ramp Accounting Agent, Vic.ai, Xero, Zeni
no first choice
Six alternativesBILL, Botkeeper, Digits, Docyt, Puzzle, Ramp Accounting Agent
against: ChatGPT, Claude, FreshBooks, Gemini, Microsoft Copilot, QuickBooks Online, Xero
Mistral SmallVic.ai
One alternativeBooke AI
Lunos AI, Vic.aiChangedSage Intacct
Five alternativesBILL, Numeric, QuickBooks Online, Ramp Accounting Agent, Vic.ai
Tipalti
Three alternativesMakersHub, Melio, Routable
no first choiceagainst: QuickBooks with bolt-on AI
DeepSeek V4 FlashOracle NetSuite
Four alternativesFloQast, Ramp Accounting Agent, Sage Intacct, Vic.ai
BlackLineChanged
Six alternativesBILL, FloQast, Maxima, Rillet, SAP's embedded AI, Vic.ai
no first choice
Six alternativesBlackLine, FloQast, Numeric, Oracle NetSuite, Sage Intacct, Vic.ai
against: Maxima, Rillet
Sage Intacct
One alternativeRamp Accounting Agent
against: Vic.ai
no first choice
Five alternativesFloQast, Maxima, Numeriс, Trullion, Vic.ai
against: FreshBooks, QuickBooks Online
against: Indy, QuickBooks Online, Rillet, Sage products, Xero
Llama 4 MaverickVic.aiMaximaChanged
Three alternativesBasis, BlackLine, Paraglide
no first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Qwen 3.7 FlashSage Intacct
Five alternativesBILL, BlackLine, FloQast, QuickBooks Online, Vic.ai
Lunos AIChanged
Three alternativesFloQast, Maxima, Vic.ai
Numeric, Vic.ai
Three alternativesBlackLine, FloQast, Within
SAP S/4HANA
Two alternativesMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Finance, Oracle NetSuite
against: BookWell, Botkeeper, QuickBooks Online, Xero, Zeni
no first choiceagainst: FreshBooks, QuickBooks Online Intuit, Wave, Xero
Kimi K2BlackLine, Sage Intacct
Three alternativesFloQast, Oracle NetSuite, Vic.ai
MaximaChanged
Two alternativesBlackLine, Vic.ai
BlackLine, Trintech Cadency
Three alternativesNumeric, Vic.ai, Workiva
against: FloQast
BlackLine
Two alternativesFloQast, Workday Financial Management
against: Oracle NetSuite, QuickBooks Online, Sage Intacct, Vic.ai, Xero
no first choiceagainst: ChatGPT, Claude, Oracle NetSuite, QuickBooks Online, Sage Intacct, Stampli, Xero
GLM 4.7 FlashXNumeric, Oracle NetSuite
Four alternativesBlackLine, Ramp Accounting Agent, Rillet, Trullion
BlackLine Agentic Financial Operations with Verity AIChanged
Two alternativesNumeric, Oracle Fusion Cloud Financial Management
FloQast, Numeric
Three alternativesRamp Accounting Agent, Trullion, Vic.ai
SAP Concur
Two alternativesBookWell, Oracle NetSuite
no first choiceagainst: ChatGPT, Claude
MiniMax M2.5Oracle NetSuite, Sage Intacct
Two alternativesQuickBooks Online, Vic.ai
BlackLine, Vic.aiChanged
Two alternativesFloQast, Monday.com AI Agents
BlackLine
Four alternativesNumeric, Rillet, Trullion, Vic.ai
Oracle NetSuite, Sage Intacct
One alternativeMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Finance
against: Xero
no first choice
One alternativeVic.ai
against: Rima
against: ChatGPT, Claude, FreshBooks, Gemini, Microsoft Copilot, QuickBooks Online, Xero
GPT-6 LunaRillet
Three alternativesBlackLine, Oracle NetSuite, Vic.ai
BlackLine VerityChanged
Three alternativesOracle's native finance agents, UiPath, Workday Accounting Agent
no first choice
Eight alternativesBlackLine, Microsoft Copilot, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance, Oracle Fusion Cloud Financials, SAP S/4HANA Cloud + Joule, Sage Intacct, Tipalti, Workday Financial Management
Oracle Fusion Financials, SAP S/4HANA
One alternativeOracle NetSuite
against: Intuit Enterprise Suite
no first choicenothing named
Muse Glimmer 30BRillet
Three alternativesFincent, Oracle NetSuite, Sage Intacct
against: QuickBooks Online
BlackLineChanged
Two alternativesFloQast, Numeric
no first choice
Eight alternativesAdra, BlackLine, Bluecopa, HighRadius, Maxima, Numeric, Trintech Cadency, Vic.ai
against: QuickBooks Online, Xero
Digits
One alternativeTofu
against: Karbon, Numeric
no first choiceagainst: Basis, Intuit Enterprise Suite, QuickBooks Online, Xero
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 10:44yes97 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 09:26yes45 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 10:34yes1627 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 08:42yes173 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 11:30yes2210 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 11:23yes53 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 09:11yes2549 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 10:58yes52 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 10:56yes1036 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 08:59yes1520 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 07:52yes2230 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 08:51yes1017 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 08:37yes412 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 10:19yes1932 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 09:56yes179 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 07:31yes46 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 09:47yes2221 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 11:24yes195 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 07:46yes246 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 08:22yes53 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 07:41yes2439 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 08:56yes52 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 11:15yes521 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 07:30yes1820 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 11:08yes22200 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 11:11yes1430 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 07:47yes422 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 08:56yes1322 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 08:10yes107 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 08:00yes911 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 07:45yes3430 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 09:50yes236 s
ComparativeGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 08:21yes208 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 08:16yes97 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 11:24yes2443 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 09:36yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 07:49yes948 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 07:38yes2526 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 10:54yes1939 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 09:15yes1224 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 08:06yes732 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 11:24yes1545 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 08:30yes178 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 10:17yes45 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 08:13yes1728 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 08:28yes203 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 10:20yes2310 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 11:02yes106 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 07:43yes2425 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 08:18yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 09:44yes22217 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 11:22yes1823 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 08:06yes19114 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 11:19yes1838 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 10:58yes317 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 09:34yes2031 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 11:16yes1813 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 07:55no08 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 08:39yes930 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 08:37yes196 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 09:02yes198 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 07:40no07 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 09:58yes2348 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 11:25yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 08:44no036 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 08:53yes1031 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 08:26yes1435 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 08:59yes917 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 09:59yes318 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 11:10yes1435 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 08:29yes1919 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 10:35yes68 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 07:37yes1527 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 08:34yes214 s
Negative framingGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 10:02yes239 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 07:39yes128 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 09:08yes2442 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 08:40yes52 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 07:41yes832 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 10:04yes2439 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 11:12yes2442 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 08:23yes514 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 07:44yes229 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 08:18yes2534 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Acumatica read as Acumatica Cloud ERP
Bill.com read as BILL
Booke read as Booke AI
NetSuite read as Oracle NetSuite
QuickBooks read as QuickBooks Online
QuickBooks Enterprise read as QuickBooks Online
Ramp read as Ramp Accounting Agent
Ramp (Enterprise Tier) read as Ramp Accounting Agent
Workday read as Workday Financial Management
Unresolved, counted raw
Azure OpenAI
BlackLine Agentic Financial Operations with Verity AI
BlackLine Verity
Consarc
Dooap Studio
Fincent
Intuit
Monday.com AI Agents
Numeriс
OpenAI-based enterprise workflows
Oracle AI in NetSuite
Oracle Fusion Financials
Oracle's NetSuite
Oracle's native finance agents
Oracle’s embedded AI
QuickBooks Online Intuit
QuickBooks with bolt-on AI
Revzio
Rima
SAP Business AI
SAP S/4HANA Cloud + Joule
SAP's embedded AI
SAP’s Joule
Sage products
Within (formerly Klarity)
Zeni AI bookkeeping
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Accounting softwareCrypto accounting →