Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 82 of 116, unchanged
1 category · Named, not rankedActiveCollab
2Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
2 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. ActiveCollab was named 2 times in Global e-invoicing compl, where Avalara E-Invoicing led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market41 of 136
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In global e-invoicing compl · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named ActiveCollab for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global e-invoicing compliance | Tax and compliance | 0% | 41 of 136 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Avalara E-Invoicing at 25% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, ActiveCollab held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Global e-invoicing compl · by segment
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global e-invoicing compl | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 41 of 136, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated ActiveCollab across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated ActiveCollab across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“sevdesk or ActiveCollab give EN16931 validation without enterprise pricing.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Global e-invoicing compl · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ActiveCollab, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ActiveCollab was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ActiveCollab, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ActiveCollab was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ActiveCollab. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named ActiveCollab and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
activecollab.comYour site2
f6s.com2
hashmicro.com2
medium.com2
wifitalents.com2
worksbuddy.ai2
zipdo.co2
acquisition-international.com1
blog.pleo.io1
blog.trginternational.com1
Fifteen of the seventeen domain citations in answers naming ActiveCollab came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on activecollab.com
826
subdomains included
Content
594
counted in the table below
Documentation
131
Product · Integration
20 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 324 | 3 | 2026-09-17 | ERP systems, Invoicing software | |
| Glossary or explainer | 145 | undated | ERP systems | ||
| Case study | 83 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 38 | 0 | 2026-02-24 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 3 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-17Recaps blog
- 2026-09-17Activecollab summer recap 2026 blog
- 2026-09-03Product blog
- 2026-04-01Activecollab monthly updates march 2026 blog
- 2026-03-06Activecollab monthly updates february 2026 blog
- 2026-02-24Compare comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page activecollab.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.
Follow ActiveCollab
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
ActiveCollab is its own company.ShowHide
The company
ActiveCollab is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- A simple-to-use, powerful productivity and collaboration workspace for task, project, team, client, and billing management, made for SME agencies and consultancies.
- For
- growing service business
- Price stated
- ActiveCollab has three paid plans, billed monthly or yearly. Plus — $15 per month flat ($12.50/month billed yearly). Pro — $11 per user per month ($10 billed yearly). Pro+ (Get Paid) — $17 per user per month ($15 billed yearly). Teams with 100+ seats pay $3.50 per user per month on annual billing. activecollab.com/pricing
- Starting price
- 15 activecollab.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- try free - every feature, no limits activecollab.com
- Certifications
- GDPR ready
- Hosting
- CanadaUnited StatesFrance
- Customers named
- HavelkadesignTrail DigitalStoere Binken Designpr24Future ForwardJUICE Creative GroupRock AgencyFédération Internationale de Volleyball
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations
What ActiveCollab's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: activecollab.com, activecollab.com/pricing, activecollab.com/security, activecollab.com/use-cases/tech, activecollab.com/blog/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ActiveCollab's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ActiveCollab, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ActiveCollab by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where ActiveCollab is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name ActiveCollab, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.