Small businessgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsNot ranked
1 category · Named, not rankedClearTax
10Judge labels
1First choices
1Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. ClearTax was named 4 times in Global e-invoicing compl, where Avalara E-Invoicing led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market39 of 136
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise10 of 90
2%6 labels
under the label threshold
In global e-invoicing compl · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named ClearTax for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global e-invoicing compliance | Tax and compliance | 0% | 39 of 136 | 25% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Avalara E-Invoicing at 25% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, ClearTax held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Global e-invoicing compl · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 31 → 34 of 116
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 9 → 10 of 87
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global e-invoicing compl | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 31 → 39 of 136 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated ClearTax across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated ClearTax across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labels1
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative4 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Positioned as a complete financial solution for e-invoicing, not just country-by-country compliance.” Perplexity Sonar · Global e-invoicing compl · comparative prompt · first choice
“Need country-specific compliance support: ClearTax” Perplexity Sonar · Global e-invoicing compl · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Emerging, good API-first approach | Newer vendor, less track record” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Global e-invoicing compl · scale prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ClearTax, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ClearTax was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ClearTax, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ClearTax was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ClearTax. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 10 answers that named ClearTax and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
mindsprint.com9
cleartax.comYour site8
highradius.com7
thedigitalprojectmanager.com5
tungstenautomation.com4
vatit.com4
worldmetrics.org4
zipdo.co4
gitnux.org3
klippa.com3
Forty-three of the fifty-one domain citations in answers naming ClearTax came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
cleartax.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, ClearTax takes 0% of first choices and Avalara E-Invoicing takes 25%.ShowHide
Search and answers
cleartax.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, ClearTax takes 0% of first choices and Avalara E-Invoicing takes 25%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “e-invoicing platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “e-invoicing compliance platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 2,900 a month (“cleartax”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 60 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 2,108 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,341 · 56 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,091
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess1 ads · 1 text · 0 shown in the last 30 days
First shown June 2026, as Defmacro Software Private Limited, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 1 in the year.
On Google's pages: 1
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 39 of 136 in global e-invoicing compl
Segment leader
25%
Avalara E-Invoicing
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 10 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 10 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on cleartax.com
923
subdomains included
Content
35
counted in the table below
Documentation
3
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comparison | 14 | 0 | 2026-06-24 | ||
| Template or tool | 13 | 0 | 2026-04-06 | ||
| News or press | 5 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 2 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-06-24Uae e invoicing phase 1 vs phase 2 comparison
- 2026-06-04Uae e invoicing phase 1 vs phase 2 comparison
- 2026-04-06Uae e invoicing compliance checklist template or tool
- 2025-10-10Vat calculator template or tool
- 2024-08-29Vat calculator template or tool
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page cleartax.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow ClearTax
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
ClearTax is its own company.ShowHide
The company
ClearTax is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Global e-Invoicing & Tax Compliance Platform for Enterprises
- For
- Enterprises
- Integrations claimed
- 3000 cleartax.com
- Certifications
- local government accreditationOpen Peppol Access Point
- Customers named
- JK TyrePumaZamil IndustrialGamuda Land
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, hosting
What ClearTax's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: cleartax.com, cleartax.com/om/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ClearTax's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ClearTax, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ClearTax by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where ClearTax is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name ClearTax, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.