Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 16 of 99, unchanged
Adra Balancer
3Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
3 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Adra Balancer was named 3 times in Financial consolidation and 1 other category, where Prophix led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market16 of 102
2%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In financial consolidation · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Adra Balancer for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial consolidation | Accounting and close | 2% | 16 of 102 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Prophix at 24% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. |
| Financial close management | Accounting and close | 0% | 20 of 85 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 55% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Adra Balancer held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Financial consolidation · by segment
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial consolidation | 0% | 2% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. | New this edition | Rank 16 of 102, unchanged |
| Financial close manageme | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 20 of 85, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Adra Balancer across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Adra Balancer across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labels1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If your budget is limited and you need the basics: start with Adra Balancer. It has the clearest low entry price” GPT-5.4 mini · Financial consolidation · budget prompt · first choice
“FloQast and Adra Balancer appear to be the most recommended” MiniMax M2.5 · Financial close manageme · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Reconciliation automation \u2192 Adra Balancer” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Financial close manageme · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Adra Balancer, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Adra Balancer was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Adra Balancer, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Adra Balancer was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Adra Balancer. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 3 answers that named Adra Balancer and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
numeric.io2
softwareadvice.com2
capterra.com1
chatfin.ai1
dokka.com1
erpresearch.com1
finance-ai-index.com1
financial-cents.com1
g2.com1
getapp.com1
Twelve of the twelve domain citations in answers naming Adra Balancer came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
trintech.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Adra Balancer takes 2% of first choices and Prophix takes 24%.ShowHide
Search and answers
trintech.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Adra Balancer takes 2% of first choices and Prophix takes 24%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “consolidation tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “financial consolidation software”
–
not in the top ten
- Its company's site
- trintech.com shared with Adra's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 30,370 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,316 · 297 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,386
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 16 of 102 in financial consolidation
Segment leader
24%
Prophix
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 3 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 3 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Adra Balancer
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Adra Balancer; a claim can dispute any of them.
Adra Balancer (from Trintech) 1
Follow Adra Balancer
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Adra is the company behind Adra Balancer.ShowHide
The company
Adra is the company behind Adra Balancer.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Balance Sheet Reconciliation Software
- For
- Mid-Market Companies
- Customers named
- AuxisAmeriCUDouglas DynamicsBitstampRE/MAXLB ForsikringDallas CowboysAutohuset Vestergaard
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Adra Balancer's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: trintech.com/adra/balancer, trintech.com/brochure/adra-balancer-brochure, trintech.com/video/account-reconciliations-in-balancer, trintech.com/video/utilizing-balancer-and-matcher-for-account-reconciliations, trintech.com/video/adra-balancer-on-demand-demo-for-automated-balance-sheet-reconciliation. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Adra Balancer's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Adra Balancer, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Adra Balancer by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Adra Balancer is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Adra Balancer, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.