AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › Financial Cents · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

Financial Cents

16Judge labels
4First choices
1Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
8 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Financial Cents was named 8 times in Financial close manageme and 1 other category, where FloQast led with 55%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In financial close manageme · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Financial Cents for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Financial close managementAccounting and close4%6 of 8517%6under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 55%▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
AI accounting assistantsAccounting and close0%28 of 850%2under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 22%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, Financial Cents held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 10 points.

Best category · Financial close manageme · by segment

Small business▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 21 → 10 of 88
Mid-market▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 22 → 6 of 77

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Financial close manageme0%4%▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 22 → 6 of 85
AI accounting assistants0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 28 of 85, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Financial Cents across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00011
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick01001
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX10001
MiniMax M2.510001
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B11002

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase4 labels1
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained11 labels3
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 label1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Under $100/month total | Financial Cents, Double, Xenett, Easy Month End” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Financial close manageme · budget prompt · first choice
“use purpose-built AI, like the features in Financial Cents, for client work” Muse Glimmer 30B · AI accounting assistants · negative prompt · first choice
“Financial Cents (Best Overall for Budget)” MiniMax M2.5 · Financial close manageme · budget prompt · first choice
“Financial Cents is a top pick for firms that want month-end close combined with workflow automation” Muse Glimmer 30B · Financial close manageme · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“mainly for bookkeeping firms rather than general corporate finance teams” Perplexity Sonar · Financial close manageme · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Financial Cents, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Financial Cents was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Numeric10 of 166Not among the top eight
FloQast9 of 160Not among the top eight
Double8 of 161Not among the top eight
BlackLine8 of 160Not among the top eight
Xero7 of 161Not among the top eight
Xenett6 of 160Not among the top eight
QuickBooks Online5 of 162Not among the top eight
Easy Month End5 of 160Not among the top eight
Finlens4 of 161Not among the top eight
OneStream3 of 160Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Financial Cents. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 16 answers that named Financial Cents and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

financial-cents.comYour site15
numeric.io12
g2.com9
guideflow.com9
datarails.com7
learn.g2.com7
thedigitalmerchant.com7
us.fitgap.com6
dokka.com5
prophix.com5

Sixty-seven of the eighty-two domain citations in answers naming Financial Cents came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

financial-cents.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Financial Cents takes 4% of first choices and FloQast takes 55%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “close management tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “financial close management software”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
5,400 a month (“financial cents”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
54 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 17,974 a month
Searches its site ranks for
6,114 · 208 in the top three
Sites linking to it
2,616
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
64 ads · 40 text, 23 video, 1 image · 19 shown in the last 30 days

First shown May 2025, as Shahram Justin Zarshenas, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 50 in the year, 14 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
4%
rank 6 of 85 in financial close manageme
Segment leader
55%
FloQast
First choices
4 across its categories
Named in
16 answers
Its own site cited
in 16 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on financial-cents.com
1,273
subdomains included
Content
864
counted in the table below
Documentation
274
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog40322026-09-24Accounting software, Financial close manageme
Podcast or video11082026-09-22
News or press10672026-09-17
Template or tool10402025-03-13Accounting software
Case study42undated
Report or ebook4212026-09-01
Comparison2702026-05-26
Webinar or virtual event1212026-09-17
Glossary or explainer1002026-01-29
Conference or event802026-04-10

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page financial-cents.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Financial Cents

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Financial Cents; a claim can dispute any of them.
Financial Cents (MEC) 1

Follow Financial Cents

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Financial Cents is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Accounting Practice Management Software
For
small and growing accounting, bookkeeping, and tax firms
Price stated
Starts from $19/month billed annually. financial-cents.com
Starting price
19 financial-cents.com
Free plan or trial
14-day free trial, no credit card required financial-cents.com
Certifications
SOC 2 Type 1AICPAAICPA SOC 2Inc 5000SOC II Type I certified by AICPASOC IISOC IIIGDPR
Hosting
Canadian data residencyCanadian File StorageNew York CityVirginia (USA)
Customers named
Calmwaters Cloud AccountingMain Accounting ServicesSafe Harbor BookkeepingInfinite Accounting SolutionsBirch AccountingPowerful AccountingThe Profit ConstructorsHarvey and Simons CPAs
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations

What Financial Cents's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: financial-cents.com, financial-cents.com/pricing, financial-cents.com/security, financial-cents.com/resources/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Financial Cents's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Financial Cents, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Financial Cents by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Financial Cents is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Financial Cents, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at financial-cents.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.