Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 9 → 10 of 32
2 categories · RankedQuaderno
30Judge labels
4First choices
2Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Sales tax automation for mid-market buyers
Rank 16 of 37 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 10 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Quaderno →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business10 of 33
0%10 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market16 of 37
0%10 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise37 of 46
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In sales tax automation · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Quaderno for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales tax automation | Tax and compliance | 0% | 16 of 37 | 0% | 10 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Global e-invoicing compliance | Tax and compliance | 0% | 32 of 136 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Avalara E-Invoicing at 25% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Quaderno held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Sales tax automation · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 12 → 15 of 36
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 32 → 34 of 44
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales tax automation | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 12 → 16 of 37 |
| Global e-invoicing compl | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 39 → 32 of 136 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Quaderno across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Quaderno across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase9 labels4
Comparative10 labelsNone
Budget-constrained4 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative30 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Need global VAT/GST + invoicing on a small budget: Quaderno Hobby $29/mo is the cheapest published entry.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Sales tax automation · budget prompt · alternative
“Best for Budget-Conscious / Light-Touch B2B Operations... Quaderno is highly recommended.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Global e-invoicing compl · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Best for: Solo founders, digital creators, and international sellers dealing with VAT/GST.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Sales tax automation · comparative prompt · alternative
“Consider Quaderno/Stripe Tax if you're primarily EU-focused and want lower costs” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Global e-invoicing compl · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Quaderno, over the 30 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Quaderno was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Quaderno, over the 30 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Quaderno was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Quaderno. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 30 of the 30 answers that named Quaderno and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
quaderno.ioYour site22
taxcloud.com20
zamp.com16
guideflow.com15
learn.g2.com14
taxjar.com14
avalara.com13
commenda.io11
g2.com11
galvix.com10
124 of the 146 domain citations in answers naming Quaderno came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
quaderno.io ranks 6 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Quaderno takes 0% of first choices and Avalara AvaTax takes 32%.ShowHide
Search and answers
quaderno.io ranks 6 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Quaderno takes 0% of first choices and Avalara AvaTax takes 32%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “sales tax tools”
7
Position for “sales tax compliance software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 720 a month (“quaderno”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 23 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 62,203 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 13,448 · 177 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,374
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 16 of 37 in sales tax automation
Segment leader
32%
Avalara AvaTax
- First choices
- 4 across its categories
- Named in
- 30 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 30 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on quaderno.io
1,359
subdomains included
Content
805
counted in the table below
Documentation
197
Product · Integration
5 · 25
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Report or ebook | 398 | undated | |||
| Blog | 364 | 12 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 17 | 1 | 2026-08-04 | ||
| Comparison | 14 | 5 | 2026-09-17 | ||
| Case study | 6 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 5 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-25Vat and gst threshold blog
- 2026-09-24Failed payment recovery blog
- 2026-09-22Payment reconciliation blog
- 2026-09-17Invoice vs receipt comparison
- 2026-09-15Hs code blog
- 2026-09-10Incoterms blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page quaderno.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Quaderno
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Quaderno is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Quaderno is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Worldwide tax compliance software
- For
- SaaS, software, and e-commerce businesses worldwide
- Price stated
- EUR quaderno.io
- Starting price
- 24 quaderno.io/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- free trial quaderno.io
- Certifications
- Fully GDPR compliantverified by the Visma Security Program
- Customers named
- AdTranquilityMailsuiteMentorShowMarvelArcadinaCoworking SpainThe Yoga ClassVivir al Máximo
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, hosting
What Quaderno's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: quaderno.io, quaderno.io/pricing, quaderno.io/legal/security, quaderno.io/solutions/saas, quaderno.io/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Quaderno's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Quaderno, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Quaderno by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Quaderno is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Quaderno, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.