| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales tax automation | Tax and compliance | 19% | 2 of 37 | 8% | 37 | accepted challenger | ▼−11Since September 2026: 29% → 17%, −11 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Global e-invoicing compliance | Tax and compliance | 0% | 78 of 136 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Avalara E-Invoicing at 25% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales tax automation | 29% | 17% | ▼−11Since September 2026: 29% → 17%, −11 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. | Moved past the floor | Rank 2 of 37, unchanged |
| Global e-invoicing compl | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 78 of 136, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“TaxCloud is widely considered the most affordable option for small businesses... For $0–$5 starting costs: Choose TaxCloud.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Sales tax automation · budget prompt · first choice
“the strongest all-around choice in the results is TaxCloud if your priority is to *offload the most compliance work*” Perplexity Sonar · Sales tax automation · direct prompt · first choice
“Pure US, low order volume, want free filings: TaxCloud is the lowest total cost, especially if you're in SST states.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Sales tax automation · budget prompt · first choice
“Start with TaxCloud if you're in the US and want the lowest monthly cost with free filing in many states” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Sales tax automation · budget prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“TaxCloud consistently appears across multiple review platforms with serious complaints... Who should avoid: Small ecommerce businesses” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Sales tax automation · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid if you need reliable hand-holding; better for self-service users okay with potential hiccups.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Sales tax automation · negative prompt · hard negative
“This platform has received numerous complaints. Users report being overcharged by thousands” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Sales tax automation · negative prompt · hard negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 103 of the 105 answers that named TaxCloud and are not a share of its labels.
425 of the 521 domain citations in answers naming TaxCloud came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 173 | 5 | 2026-09-24 | Sales tax automation | |
| Report or ebook | 33 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 27 | 3 | 2026-09-22 | ||
| Case study | 21 | 2 | 2026-09-23 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 11 | 0 | 2026-04-29 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 2 | 0 | 2025-11-03 | ||
| Template or tool | 2 | 0 | 2026-03-08 |
Every page taxcloud.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What TaxCloud's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: taxcloud.com, taxcloud.com/legal/security, taxcloud.com/case-studies, taxcloud.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when TaxCloud's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as TaxCloud, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for TaxCloud by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
TaxCloud is among the products AI models recommend first in Sales tax automation this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.