AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › AppDeck · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

AppDeck

34Judge labels
7First choices
0Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
7% in Board portals for small business buyers
Rank 10 of 50 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 10 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of AppDeck →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In board portals · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named AppDeck for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Board portalsEquity and corporate2%10 of 500%10accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for AppDeck yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated AppDeck across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash02103
Llama 4 Maverick01001
Qwen 3.7 Flash02002
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.510001
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct7 labels3
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained14 labels4
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative6 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative34 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Boardable or AppDeck offer the best balance of affordability and functionality” MiniMax M2.5 · Board portals · budget prompt · first choice
“AppDeck ($299/mo flat) offers the best value for private companies with modern UX and real-time dashboards” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Board portals · budget prompt · alternative
“Other options include BoardPro and AppDeck, which are also affordable and offer various features.” Llama 4 Maverick · Board portals · budget prompt · alternative
“The "Growth & Finance" Option: AppDeck ... AppDeck is worth investigating” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Board portals · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as AppDeck, over the 34 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and AppDeck was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Boardable28 of 3411Not among the top eight
BoardPro25 of 346Not among the top eight
Diligent Boards23 of 341Not among the top eight
OnBoard21 of 341Not among the top eight
Nasdaq Boardvantage10 of 341Not among the top eight
BoardSpace9 of 343Not among the top eight
Govenda6 of 342Not among the top eight
BoardEffect6 of 340Not among the top eight
Azeus Convene5 of 340Not among the top eight
Ideals Board4 of 340Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named AppDeck. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 34 of the 34 answers that named AppDeck and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

appdeck.comYour site34
fast.io32
guideflow.com22
board-room.org17
capterra.com14
g2.com13
boardintelligence.com10
softwaretestinghelp.com10
boardcloud.org9
imboard.ai9

136 of the 170 domain citations in answers naming AppDeck came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

appdeck.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, AppDeck takes 2% of first choices and OnBoard takes 49%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “board portal”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “board portals”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
20 a month (“appdeck”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
0 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 185 a month
Searches its site ranks for
132 · 0 in the top three
Sites linking to it
133
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 10 of 50 in board portals
Segment leader
49%
OnBoard
First choices
7 across its categories
Named in
34 answers
Its own site cited
in 34 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on appdeck.com
243
subdomains included
Content
152
counted in the table below
Documentation
2
Product · Integration
26 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog7352026-07-07Board portals, Board
Template or tool5102026-05-20Board portals
Glossary or explainer1402026-03-22Board portals
Comparison802026-03-18
Report or ebook602026-03-19Board portals
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page appdeck.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow AppDeck

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

AppDeck is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
board updates and investor reporting, drafted monthly. One metric library, Deckster AI drafting, and white-label portals for boards, investors, and leadership teams.
For
small and mid-sized organizations; founders, executive directors, and the advisors who report for them
Price stated
Starting at $149/month, all products included appdeck.com
Starting price
149 appdeck.com
Free plan or trial
Start a free trial appdeck.com
Integrations claimed
6 appdeck.com
Certifications
SOC 2ISO 27001HIPAA
Not stated on the pages read
Hosting, customers

What AppDeck's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: appdeck.com, appdeck.com/pricing, appdeck.com/security, appdeck.com/solutions/cfo. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when AppDeck's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as AppDeck, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for AppDeck by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where AppDeck is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name AppDeck, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at appdeck.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.