Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 25 → 26 of 82
1 category · Named, not rankedAuthorize.net
14Judge labels
0First choices
7Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Authorize.net was named 1 time in B2B payment acceptance, where Versapay led with 19%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business22 of 87
0%8 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market34 of 94
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In b2b payment acceptance · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Authorize.net for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B2B payment acceptance | Receivables and billing | 0% | 34 of 94 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Versapay at 19% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Authorize.net held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · B2B payment acceptance · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 38 → 31 of 84
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B2B payment acceptance | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 38 → 34 of 94 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Authorize.net across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Authorize.net across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best for: POS-based B2B transactions and integrations.” Mistral Small · B2B payment acceptance · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Authorize.net, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Authorize.net was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Authorize.net, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Authorize.net was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Authorize.net. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 14 answers that named Authorize.net and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
fitsmallbusiness.com9
g2.com5
learn.g2.com5
stripe.com5
aspireapp.com4
nerdwallet.com4
techrepublic.com4
techtimes.com4
airwallex.com3
bbb.org3
Forty-six of the forty-six domain citations in answers naming Authorize.net came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
authorize.net is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Authorize.net takes 0% of first choices and Versapay takes 19%.ShowHide
Search and answers
authorize.net is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Authorize.net takes 0% of first choices and Versapay takes 19%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “b2b payment platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “b2b payment acceptance platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 9,900 a month (“authorize.net”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 571 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 53,158 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 3,140 · 489 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 27,793
- Paid Google search
- 9 searches its ads show for, about 82 clicks and $3,334 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 34 of 94 in B2B payment acceptance
Segment leader
19%
Versapay
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 14 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 12 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on authorize.net
9,998
subdomains included
Content
368
counted in the table below
Documentation
9,591
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 283 | undated | |||
| News or press | 34 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 17 | undated | |||
| Case study | 16 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 9 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 4 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 2 | undated |
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page authorize.net exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Authorize.net
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Authorize.net is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Authorize.net is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- We’ve completely redesigned our payments solution to help you get paid—faster.
- For
- businesses and partners
- Price stated
- All-in-one: $25 per month; 2.9% + 30¢ per transaction. Gateway only: $25 per month; 10¢ per transaction + daily batch fee 10¢. Gateway + eCheck: $25 per month; eCheck 0.75%; Credit card: 10¢ per transaction + 10¢ daily batch fee. authorize.net/sign-up/pricing.html
- Starting price
- 25 authorize.net/sign-up/pricing.html
- Certifications
- PCI DSS Level 1 Service Provider
- Customers named
- LensDirect.comThe Bromley GroupCHARACTER COUNTS!®HyCloud ComputingM'Dears Bakery and BistroSpoonful of Comfort
- Not stated on the pages read
- Free plan or trial, integrations, hosting
What Authorize.net's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: authorize.net, authorize.net/sign-up/pricing.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Authorize.net's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Authorize.net, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Authorize.net by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Authorize.net is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Authorize.net, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.