| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business bill pay | Treasury and cash | 13% | 3 of 98 | 10% | 29 | accepted challenger | ▼−13Since September 2026: 26% → 13%, −13 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| B2B payment acceptance | Receivables and billing | 6% | 8 of 94 | 14% | 21 | accepted challenger | ▼−1Since September 2026: 9% → 7%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Accounts payable automation | Spend and procurement | 5% | 6 of 54 | 5% | 19 | accepted challenger | ▼−15Since September 2026: 19% → 4%, −15 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| B2B BNPL and net terms | Receivables and billing | 2% | 8 of 90 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Resolve Pay at 56% | |
| Contractor payments | Spend and procurement | 2% | 13 of 98 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Tipalti at 22% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Accounts receivable automation | Receivables and billing | 2% | 16 of 79 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Upflow at 17% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Invoicing software | Receivables and billing | 0% | 25 of 71 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Zoho Invoice at 24% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| AI accounting assistants | Accounting and close | 0% | 66 of 85 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 22% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accounts payable automat | 19% | 4% | ▼−15Since September 2026: 19% → 4%, −15 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. | Moved past the floor | Rank 3 → 6 of 54 |
| Business bill pay | 26% | 13% | ▼−13Since September 2026: 26% → 13%, −13 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. | Moved past the floor | Rank 2 → 3 of 98 |
| B2B BNPL and terms | 0% | 3% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 3% now. | New this edition | Rank 8 of 90, unchanged |
| B2B payment acceptance | 9% | 7% | ▼−1Since September 2026: 9% → 7%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 5 → 8 of 94 |
| Accounts receivable auto | 2% | 2% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 14 → 16 of 79 |
| Contractor payments | 2% | 2% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 15 → 13 of 98 |
| Invoicing software | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 25 of 71, unchanged |
| AI accounting assistants | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 66 of 85, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 10 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 9 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 9 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 7 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 10 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“🏆 Top Pick: Melio ... Melio is widely regarded as the best free starting point for budget-conscious small businesses” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Business bill pay · budget prompt · first choice
“Choose Melio if you primarily need simple bill pay with some free ACH transfers and want to pay by credit card” Kimi K2 · Business bill pay · budget prompt · first choice
“Nickel (for unlimited free ACH) or Melio (for a free tier and low per-payment fees) are the best choices” Mistral Small · B2B payment acceptance · budget prompt · first choice
“Melio (Best Overall for Small Businesses) ... I'd recommend starting with Melio or Nickel” MiniMax M2.5 · B2B payment acceptance · budget prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Some users report payments debited from their account but never reaching vendors” Kimi K2 · Accounts payable automat · negative prompt · hard negative
“you've outgrown small-business tools like Melio or basic QuickBooks Bill Pay” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Business bill pay · scale prompt · hard negative
“BBB rating of "F" with 100+ negative reviews (2.21/5 average)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · B2B payment acceptance · negative prompt · hard negative
“While small-business tools like Melio or basic setups of BILL (formerly Bill.com) are popular, mid-market companies ... quickly outgrow them” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Business bill pay · direct prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 277 of the 292 answers that named Melio and are not a share of its labels.
794 of the 878 domain citations in answers naming Melio came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 313 | 29 | 2026-09-18 | Accounting software, Expense management | |
| Glossary or explainer | 43 | 3 | 2026-09-18 | ||
| News or press | 36 | 1 | 2026-08-17 | ||
| Case study | 22 | 0 | 2026-05-04 | ||
| Comparison | 19 | 3 | 2026-09-18 | Expense management | |
| Template or tool | 6 | 0 | 2023-11-20 | ||
| Report or ebook | 1 | 0 | 2026-06-03 |
Every page melio.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Melio's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: melio.com, melio.com/pricing, melio.com/security, melio.com/case-studies, melio.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Melio's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Melio, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Melio by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
Melio is among the products AI models recommend first in Business bill pay this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.