AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › Cashbook · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Cashbook

23Judge labels
3First choices
0Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
5% in Cash application for small business buyers
Rank 25 of 83 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 8 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In cash application · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Cashbook for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Cash applicationReceivables and billing0%25 of 830%8under 10 labels · led by Versapay at 9%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Cashbook held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.

Best category · Cash application · by segment

Small business▲+6Since September 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
6%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 4 pointsRank 29 → 6 of 82
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 26 → 28 of 79
Enterprise▼−3Since September 2026: 3% → 0%, −3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 3% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 8 → 14 of 58

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Cash application0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 26 → 25 of 83

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Cashbook across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00101
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick01102
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.501001
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B01102

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative5 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained6 labels2
Scale-constrained4 labels1
Negative3 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative23 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“best for organisations seeking specialist cash application automation, fast implementation, deep ERP integration” Muse Glimmer 30B · Cash application · comparative prompt · alternative
“Multi-ERP environment | Emagia, Cashbook, or Bluecopa” Kimi K2 · Cash application · negative prompt · alternative
“Cashbook is a dedicated specialist cash application tool.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Cash application · direct prompt · alternative
“Other options include Upflow, Gaviti, and Cashbook” Llama 4 Maverick · Cash application · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Cashbook, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Cashbook was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
HighRadius18 of 237Not among the top eight
Billtrust14 of 231Not among the top eight
Esker14 of 230Not among the top eight
BlackLine Cash Application13 of 232Not among the top eight
Versapay13 of 231Not among the top eight
Emagia9 of 230Not among the top eight
Quadient Accounts Receivable9 of 230Not among the top eight
Serrala7 of 230Not among the top eight
Gaviti6 of 231Not among the top eight
Sidetrade6 of 230Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Cashbook. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 23 of the 23 answers that named Cashbook and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

bluecopa.com16
cashbook.comYour site16
highradius.com16
chaserhq.com15
thecfoclub.com14
rex.inc12
stuut.ai12
ledge.co11
worldmetrics.org9
finance-ai-index.com8

113 of the 129 domain citations in answers naming Cashbook came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

cashbook.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Cashbook takes 0% of first choices and Versapay takes 9%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “cash application tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “cash application software”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
1,600 a month (“cashbook”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
49 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 1,306 a month
Searches its site ranks for
273 · 20 in the top three
Sites linking to it
298
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 25 of 83 in cash application
Segment leader
9%
Versapay
First choices
3 across its categories
Named in
23 answers
Its own site cited
in 23 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on cashbook.com
679
subdomains included
Content
502
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog290162026-09-10Cash application, Account reconciliation
Conference or event12502026-04-27
Glossary or explainer3102026-02-18Cash application, Account reconciliation
Webinar or virtual event2902026-02-17Cash application, Account reconciliation
Case study2012026-07-13Account reconciliation
Comparison312026-09-16
Template or tool212026-09-16
Podcast or video2undated

Events in person

Upcoming
Last twelve months

As the event pages on cashbook.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page cashbook.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Cashbook

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Cashbook is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Accounts Receivable Automation – Cash Flow Management
For
companies with high-volume transactions
Integrations claimed
16 cashbook.com
Customers named
A. Schulman
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, certifications, hosting

What Cashbook's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: cashbook.com, cashbook.com/solutions, cashbook.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Cashbook's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Cashbook, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Cashbook by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Cashbook is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Cashbook, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at cashbook.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.