AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › D&B Finance Analytics · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

D&B Finance Analytics

21Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in B2B credit management for enterprise buyers
Rank 14 of 108 in the mid-market standing
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 6 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In b2b credit management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named D&B Finance Analytics for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
B2B credit managementReceivables and billing2%14 of 1080%6under 10 labels · led by Chaser at 16%=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Ecommerce fraud preventionReceivables and billing0%52 of 700%1under 10 labels · led by SEON at 16%

Movement

Since September 2026, D&B Finance Analytics held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 10 points.

Best category · B2B credit management · by segment

Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 17 → 21 of 81
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 19 → 13 of 97
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 11 → 17 of 74

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
B2B credit management2%2%=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 19 → 14 of 108
Ecommerce fraud0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 52 of 70, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated D&B Finance Analytics across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.1 Fast10001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200101
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna01001
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct7 labels1
Paraphrase5 labelsNone
Comparative6 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative21 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Often ranked #1 for mid-market on Slashdot and multiple lists.” Grok 4.1 Fast · B2B credit management · direct prompt · first choice
“Consider D&B Finance Analytics if your portfolio is highly international” GPT-6 Luna · B2B credit management · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“If you mainly need new customer risk assessment → D&B, Creditsafe” DeepSeek V4 Flash · B2B credit management · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as D&B Finance Analytics, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and D&B Finance Analytics was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
HighRadius Credit Cloud15 of 2110Not among the top eight
Creditsafe14 of 211Not among the top eight
Bectran13 of 210Not among the top eight
Esker11 of 210Not among the top eight
Billtrust6 of 210Not among the top eight
Chaser5 of 213Not among the top eight
Tesorio5 of 211Not among the top eight
Gaviti5 of 210Not among the top eight
Upflow4 of 211Not among the top eight
Nuvo4 of 210Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named D&B Finance Analytics. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 20 of the 21 answers that named D&B Finance Analytics and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com13
guideflow.com13
highradius.com13
nuvo.com12
worldmetrics.org10
chaserhq.com9
creditpulse.com9
esker.com7
learn.g2.com7
rex.inc7

100 of the 100 domain citations in answers naming D&B Finance Analytics came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

dnb.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, D&B Finance Analytics takes 2% of first choices and Chaser takes 16%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “credit management tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “b2b credit management software”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
not counted (“d&b finance analytics”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
4 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 1,974,778 a month
Searches its site ranks for
553,565 · 13,606 in the top three
Sites linking to it
40,720
Paid Google search
2 searches its ads show for, about 73 clicks and $1,218 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
64+ ads · 48 text, 11 image, 5 video · 22 shown in the last 30 days

First shown May 2022, as Dun & Bradstreet INC, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 3 in the year, 61 before. 56 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 14 of 108 in B2B credit management
Segment leader
16%
Chaser
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
21 answers
Its own site cited
in 20 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on dnb.com
4,400
subdomains included
Content
549
counted in the table below
Documentation
267
Product · Integration
93 · 35
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog385undated
News or press4002026-03-06
Case study38undated
Glossary or explainer38undated
Webinar or virtual event3202026-06-15
Comparison802026-05-29
Report or ebook6undated
Conference or event102025-06-10
Template or tool1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page dnb.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as D&B Finance Analytics

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as D&B Finance Analytics; a claim can dispute any of them.
D&B Finance Analytics (Dun & Bradstreet) 2

Follow D&B Finance Analytics

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

D&B Finance Analytics is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Customers named
The Marzetti Company
Not stated on the pages read
Positioning, who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What D&B Finance Analytics's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: dnb.com, dnb.com/sv-se/blogg/compliance/vad-ar-kyc.html, dnb.com/en-us/products/try.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when D&B Finance Analytics's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as D&B Finance Analytics, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for D&B Finance Analytics by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where D&B Finance Analytics is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name D&B Finance Analytics, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at dnb.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.