Finance AI Index

Index › Products › CryptaCount · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

CryptaCount

16Judge labels

3First choices

2Negative labels

9 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

7 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. CryptaCount was named 7 times in Crypto accounting, where Bitwave led with 27%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business42 of 52

under the label threshold

Mid-market7 of 54

under the label threshold

Enterprise13 of 46

under the label threshold

In crypto accounting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named CryptaCount for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Crypto accounting	Accounting and close	5%	7 of 54	0%	7	under 10 labels · led by Bitwave at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for CryptaCount yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated CryptaCount across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	1	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct10 labels3

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“CryptaCount and Ledgible appear to be the most recommended for mid-market B2B companies based on current reviews.” MiniMax M2.5 · Crypto accounting · direct prompt · first choice

“The best crypto accounting platform for a mid-market B2B company is CryptaCount” Llama 4 Maverick · Crypto accounting · direct prompt · first choice

“Top Recommendation: CryptaCount” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Crypto accounting · direct prompt · first choice

“CryptaCount (free plan available, paid from ~$399/month) or Breezing ... are worth evaluating.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Crypto accounting · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as CryptaCount, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CryptaCount was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Bitwave11 of 165Not among the top eight

TRES Finance10 of 160Not among the top eight

Cryptoworth6 of 162Not among the top eight

Cryptio6 of 161Not among the top eight

Koinly5 of 162Not among the top eight

Ledgible5 of 160Not among the top eight

SoftLedger4 of 160Not among the top eight

Breezing3 of 162Not among the top eight

CoinLedger2 of 160Not among the top eight

Node402 of 160Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CryptaCount. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 16 answers that named CryptaCount and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

itechguides.com14

spark.money12

coinledger.io9

techdogs.com9

fitsmallbusiness.com8

cryptacount.comYour site6

g2.com6

breezing.io5

milkroad.com5

sourceforge.net5

Seventy-three of the seventy-nine domain citations in answers naming CryptaCount came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

spark.money/tools/crypto-accounting-software-comparison12

coinledger.io/tools/best-crypto-accounting-software9

itechguides.com/best/crypto-accounting-software9

techdogs.com/td-articles/product-mine/best-crypto-accounting-software9

fitsmallbusiness.com/best-cryptocurrency-accounting-software8

itechguides.com/best/crypto-accounting-software/compare/cryptacount-vs-cryptio7

g2.com/categories/crypto-accounting6

itechguides.com/compare/cryptacount-vs-bitwave6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

cryptacount.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, CryptaCount takes 5% of first choices and Bitwave takes 27%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “crypto accounting platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “crypto accounting platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 10 a month (“cryptacount”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 63 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 36 · 0 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 502
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 7 of 54 in crypto accounting

Segment leader

27%

Bitwave

First choices: 3 across its categories
Named in: 16 answers
Its own site cited: in 16 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on cryptacount.com

2,751

subdomains included

Content

185

counted in the table below

Documentation

110

Product · Integration

0 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
News or press	130	94	2026-10-05	Crypto accounting
Report or ebook	23	undated
Comparison	19	undated
Template or tool	7	undated
Blog	4	undated		Crypto accounting
Glossary or explainer	2	undated

Most recent

2026-10-05Mica compliance retail trust bitpanda ceo enforcement 2026 news or press
2026-10-05Bitgo clarity act failure capital markets systemic risk 2026 news or press
2026-10-05General news or press
2026-10-05Stablecoins news or press
2026-10-05Enforcement news or press
2026-10-02Cbdc news or press

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page cryptacount.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow CryptaCount

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

CryptaCount is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Crypto accounting software for firms and auditors; crypto accounting and tax compliance platform for accounting firms, auditors, and institutional operators.
cryptacount.com
For: accounting firms, auditors, and institutional operators
cryptacount.com
Price stated: B2B plans are billed monthly or annually with transparent, published pricing and no hidden fees; regulated, enterprise and high-volume needs are handled by a custom plan. cryptacount.com
Starting price: 399 cryptacount.com
Free plan or trial: There is a free tier so you can evaluate the platform, and every paid plan includes a 14-day free trial with no credit card required. cryptacount.com
Integrations claimed: 100 cryptacount.com
Certifications: SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001
Hosting: Google Cloud
Not stated on the pages read: Customers

What CryptaCount's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: cryptacount.com, cryptacount.com/en/pricing. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CryptaCount's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CryptaCount, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for CryptaCount by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where CryptaCount is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name CryptaCount, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.