Finance AI Index

Index › Products › Node40 · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Node40

12Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

5 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Node40 was named 4 times in Crypto accounting, where Bitwave led with 27%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business26 of 52

under the label threshold

Mid-market18 of 54

under the label threshold

Enterprise8 of 46

under the label threshold

In crypto accounting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Node40 for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Crypto accounting	Accounting and close	0%	18 of 54	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Bitwave at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Node40 yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Node40 across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	1	2
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative5 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labels1

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Emphasizes audit defensibility and regulatory examination readiness” MiniMax M2.5 · Crypto accounting · direct prompt · alternative

“Best for: Audit-heavy firms (regulatory exams).” Grok 4.1 Fast · Crypto accounting · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Node40, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Node40 was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Bitwave9 of 127Not among the top eight

Cryptio7 of 122Not among the top eight

Cryptoworth7 of 120Not among the top eight

TRES Finance5 of 121Not among the top eight

Koinly4 of 122Not among the top eight

Ledgible3 of 121Not among the top eight

SoftLedger3 of 120Not among the top eight

TaxBit3 of 120Not among the top eight

CoinLedger2 of 121Not among the top eight

CryptaCount2 of 121Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Node40. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 12 answers that named Node40 and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

node40.comYour site12

spark.money12

fitsmallbusiness.com8

g2.com8

tres.finance8

bitwave.io7

coinledger.io6

gitnux.org5

rfp.wiki5

techdogs.com5

Sixty-four of the seventy-six domain citations in answers naming Node40 came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

node40.com/compare-best-crypto-accounting-software12

spark.money/tools/crypto-accounting-software-comparison12

fitsmallbusiness.com/best-cryptocurrency-accounting-software8

g2.com/categories/crypto-accounting7

coinledger.io/tools/best-crypto-accounting-software6

tres.finance/finos-crypto-accounting-software/top-5-crypto-accounting-software-for-enterpr6

bitwave.io/blog/how-to-choose-a-crypto-finance-tool5

techdogs.com/td-articles/product-mine/best-crypto-accounting-software5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

node40.com ranks 5 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Node40 takes 0% of first choices and Bitwave takes 27%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “crypto accounting platform”

Position for “crypto accounting platforms”

Searches for its name, Google: 70 a month (“node40”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 23 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 8 · 1 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 794
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 18 of 54 in crypto accounting

Segment leader

27%

Bitwave

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 12 answers
Its own site cited: in 12 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on node40.com

160

subdomains included

Content

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

2 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	82	6	2026-09-21	Crypto accounting
Webinar or virtual event	5	undated		Crypto accounting
Comparison	5	undated		Accounting software, Crypto accounting
Conference or event	2	undated
Glossary or explainer	1	undated

Most recent

2026-09-21Crypto cost basis lot lifecycle blog
2026-08-19Standing instructions digital asset accounting blog
2026-08-06Digital asset audit governance blog
2026-07-31Digital asset transfer evidence blog
2026-07-22A default lot method is still a tax decision blog
2026-07-17Introducing node40 bedrock governed digital asset treasury accounting blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page node40.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Node40

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Node40; a claim can dispute any of them.

NODE40 1

Follow Node40

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Node40 is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Explainable, defensible digital asset reporting for institutions. Enterprise-grade crypto reconciliation and audit software with Solana expertise and DeFi transaction transparency.
node40.com
For: CPAs, accounting firms, investment funds, cryptocurrency exchanges, payment processors, corporate treasuries
node40.com
Price stated: Contact NODE40 for custom enterprise pricing. node40.com
Integrations claimed: 2 node40.com · 20 node40.com/solutions · 23 node40.com/integrations pages disagree
Certifications: SOC 1 Type 2SOC1 complianceSOC1-compliant reportingSOC1 audit accreditationSOC 1 Type 2 certified.
Not stated on the pages read: Starting price, free plan or trial, hosting, customers

What Node40's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: node40.com, node40.com/security, node40.com/solutions, node40.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Node40's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Node40, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Node40 by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Node40 is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Node40, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.