AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › QuickBooks Contractor Payments · October 2026 Edition
QuickBooks · 1 category · Ranked

QuickBooks Contractor Payments

47Judge labels
8First choices
3Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
8% in Contractor payments for small business buyers
Rank 7 of 98 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 6% of its 17 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of QuickBooks Contractor Payments →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In contractor payments · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named QuickBooks Contractor Payments for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Contractor paymentsSpend and procurement6%7 of 986%17accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 5% → 7%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, QuickBooks Contractor Payments held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.

Best category · Contractor payments · by segment

Small business▲+3Since September 2026: 4% → 8%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
8%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 3 → 4 of 78
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 5% → 7%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
7%from 5% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 9 → 5 of 85
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 67 → 54 of 70

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Contractor payments5%7%▲+2Since September 2026: 5% → 7%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 9 → 7 of 98

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated QuickBooks Contractor Payments across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini10001
Gemini 3.5 Flash01012
Perplexity Sonar10001
Grok 4.1 Fast00202
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick00202
Qwen 3.7 Flash10001
Kimi K200101
GLM 4.7 FlashX02002
MiniMax M2.501001
GPT-6 Luna01001
Muse Glimmer 30B01102

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct10 labels2
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative10 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained22 labels6
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative47 labels in all, every segment counted; 8 of the 10 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“the best fit is usually QuickBooks if you already need accounting, invoices, and 1099 filing in one place” Perplexity Sonar · Contractor payments · budget prompt · first choice
“best value pick is usually QuickBooks Contractor Payments” GPT-5.4 mini · Contractor payments · budget prompt · first choice
“QuickBooks Contractor Payments (Best Overall Value)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Contractor payments · budget prompt · first choice
“QuickBooks Contractor Payments / QuickBooks Free ... QuickBooks Free makes it easy to track payments and handle tax compliance” Muse Glimmer 30B · Contractor payments · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“you have outgrown SMB tools like Gusto or basic QuickBooks” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Contractor payments · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as QuickBooks Contractor Payments, over the 47 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and QuickBooks Contractor Payments was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
BILL11 of 470Not among the top eight
Wise Business11 of 470Not among the top eight
OnPay6 of 471Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named QuickBooks Contractor Payments. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 47 of the 47 answers that named QuickBooks Contractor Payments and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

wingspan.app29
worksuite.com29
learn.g2.com27
gusto.com21
quickbooks.intuit.com20
remote.com18
slash.com18
guideflow.com17
wisemonk.io17
wise.com14

210 of the 210 domain citations in answers naming QuickBooks Contractor Payments came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where QuickBooks Contractor Payments stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Searches for its name, Google
720 a month (“quickbooks contractor payments”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
12 a month
Its own site
It sits on QuickBooks's site (quickbooks.ninja), so there are no site figures for it alone

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
6%
rank 7 of 98 in contractor payments
Segment leader
22%
Tipalti
First choices
8 across its categories
Named in
47 answers
Its own site cited
in 47 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as QuickBooks Contractor Payments

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as QuickBooks Contractor Payments; a claim can dispute any of them.
QuickBooks 4QuickBooks (Workforce) 1

Follow QuickBooks Contractor Payments

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

QuickBooks is the company behind QuickBooks Contractor Payments.
ShowHide
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when QuickBooks Contractor Payments's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as QuickBooks Contractor Payments, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for QuickBooks Contractor Payments by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where QuickBooks Contractor Payments is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name QuickBooks Contractor Payments, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at quickbooks.ninja is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.