AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › Ebury · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Ebury

7Judge labels
2First choices
0Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Ebury was named 5 times in Cross-border payments, where Wise Business led with 39%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In cross-border payments · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Ebury for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Cross-border payments and FXTreasury and cash2%10 of 870%5under 10 labels · led by Wise Business at 39%▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Ebury held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.

Best category · Cross-border payments · by segment

Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 17 → 7 of 60
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 6 → 10 of 82
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsNot ranked

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Cross-border payments4%2%▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 6 → 10 of 87

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Ebury across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash02002
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX10001
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B01001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase5 labels2
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd recommend Ebury as the top choice for a mid-sized B2B company” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Cross-border payments · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Choose Thunes / Ebury if you need ... FX hedging + trade finance support for mid-market exporters/importers.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Cross-border payments · direct prompt · alternative
“FX hedging (forwards up to 24 months), payments, advisory services | Relationship-heavy model” Grok 4.1 Fast · Cross-border payments · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Ebury bridges the gap between payment processing and trade finance” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Cross-border payments · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Ebury, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Ebury was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Wise Business7 of 71Not among the top eight
Airwallex6 of 72Not among the top eight
Corpay Cross-Border Payments2 of 71Not among the top eight
Kantox2 of 71Not among the top eight
OFX2 of 71Not among the top eight
Tipalti2 of 71Not among the top eight
iBanFirst2 of 71Not among the top eight
HSBC2 of 70Not among the top eight
Stripe2 of 70Not among the top eight
Adyen1 of 70Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Ebury. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 7 answers that named Ebury and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

airwallex.com4
highradius.com4
valiantceo.com4
wise.com4
apideck.com3
business.hsbc.com3
dashdevs.com3
f6s.com3
worldfirst.com3
blog.ibanfirst.com2

Thirty-three of the thirty-three domain citations in answers naming Ebury came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

ebury.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Ebury takes 2% of first choices and Wise Business takes 39%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “cross-border payment platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “cross-border payments platform for businesses”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
720 a month (“ebury”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
57 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 987 a month
Searches its site ranks for
367 · 8 in the top three
Sites linking to it
3,411
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 10 of 87 in cross-border payments
Segment leader
39%
Wise Business
First choices
2 across its categories
Named in
7 answers
Its own site cited
in 7 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on ebury.com
10,004
subdomains included
Content
3,853
counted in the table below
Documentation
430
Product · Integration
572 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog3,79702026-01-12
Comparison2612026-09-16
News or press16undated
Case study9undated
Glossary or explainer4undated
Template or tool112026-09-14
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page ebury.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Ebury

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Ebury is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Global fintech providing international business accounts, multi-currency payments, FX hedging, trade finance, and business APIs.
For
ambitious businesses
Certifications
ISO 27001PCI DSSGDPRSWIFT CSP
Hosting
Global
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, customers

What Ebury's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: ebury.com, trust.ebury.com, ebury.com/products/hedge. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Ebury's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Ebury, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Ebury by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Ebury is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Ebury, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at ebury.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.