Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 59 of 158, unchanged
1 category · Named, not rankedFairmarkit
7Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Fairmarkit was named 4 times in Strategic sourcing, where oboloo led with 15%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business65 of 166
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market14 of 128
2%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise38 of 77
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In strategic sourcing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Fairmarkit for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strategic sourcing | Spend and procurement | 2% | 14 of 128 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by oboloo at 15% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Fairmarkit held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Strategic sourcing · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 79 → 14 of 120
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsNot ranked
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strategic sourcing | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 79 → 14 of 128 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Fairmarkit across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Fairmarkit across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase2 labels1
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best Overall Fit: Fairmarkit ... My Final Verdict: Start with a demo from Fairmarkit.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Strategic sourcing · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Specialists such as Keelvar, Fairmarkit and Market Dojo do events only and deploy alongside existing suites” Muse Glimmer 30B · Strategic sourcing · scale prompt · alternative
“I'd compare it with Fairmarkit if your main pain is running lots of routine or tail-spend events” GPT-6 Luna · Strategic sourcing · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Best for Tail-Spend Automation” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Strategic sourcing · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Fairmarkit, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Fairmarkit was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Fairmarkit, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Fairmarkit was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Fairmarkit. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 7 answers that named Fairmarkit and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
spendflo.com6
softwareadvice.com5
g2.com3
gitnux.org3
responsive.io3
rfp.wiki3
sourceforge.net3
suplari.com3
tradogram.com3
guideflow.com2
Thirty-four of the thirty-four domain citations in answers naming Fairmarkit came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on fairmarkit.com
1,040
subdomains included
Content
459
counted in the table below
Documentation
488
Product · Integration
9 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 156 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 120 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 92 | 2 | 2026-09-02 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 49 | undated | |||
| Case study | 19 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 9 | 0 | 2026-04-03 | ||
| Report or ebook | 8 | 2 | 2026-07-22 | ||
| Template or tool | 6 | 2 | 2026-09-02 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-02Sealed bids conference or event
- 2026-09-02Create a full template template or tool
- 2026-08-17Manage templates template or tool
- 2026-08-12Manage collaborators conference or event
- 2026-07-22Price books report or ebook
- 2026-07-08Price books overview intake requests report or ebook
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page fairmarkit.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Fairmarkit
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Fairmarkit is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Fairmarkit is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- the leading autonomous sourcing platform that uses AI agents to automate the full sourcing lifecycle
- For
- enterprise procurement
- Certifications
- SOC 2ISO 27001
- Customers named
- EKFCLVVWDBoeingBPCCEPAraucoAlcoaMBTA
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting
What Fairmarkit's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: fairmarkit.com, fairmarkit.com, fairmarkit.com/platform/intake-agent, fairmarkit.com/case-studies, fairmarkit.com/platform/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Fairmarkit's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Fairmarkit, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Fairmarkit by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Fairmarkit is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Fairmarkit, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.