Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 100 of 116, unchanged
2 categories · Named, not rankedFinastra
6Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Finastra was named 3 times in Treasury management syst and 1 other category, where Trovata led with 28%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market106 of 124
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise59 of 90
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In treasury management syst · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Finastra for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treasury management systems | Treasury and cash | 0% | 106 of 124 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Trovata at 28% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Cash flow forecasting | Treasury and cash | 0% | 64 of 101 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Agicap at 13% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Finastra held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Treasury management syst · by segment
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 52 of 82, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treasury management syst | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 106 of 124, unchanged |
| Cash flow forecasting | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 64 of 101, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Finastra across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Finastra across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Others: Eastnets, Finastra (avoid if too enterprise-heavy like SAP).” Grok 4.1 Fast · Treasury management syst · scale prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Finastra, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Finastra was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Finastra, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Finastra was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Finastra. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 6 answers that named Finastra and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
airwallex.com2
brex.com2
rho.co2
10xbanking.com1
atlar.com1
backbase.com1
bankstore.ai1
banxe.com1
bluevine.com1
bookings.hants.gov.uk1
Thirteen of the thirteen domain citations in answers naming Finastra came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on finastra.com
521
subdomains included
Content
482
counted in the table below
Documentation
8
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Report or ebook | 161 | undated | |||
| Blog | 138 | 16 | 2026-09-17 | ||
| Podcast or video | 74 | undated | |||
| Case study | 55 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 36 | undated | |||
| News or press | 16 | 6 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Comparison | 1 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Finastra launches supply chain finance help banks accelerate working capital growth news or press
- 2026-09-17Building scalable foundation trade finance growth blog
- 2026-09-14Finastra and komgo partner advance digital trade finance news or press
- 2026-09-10Financial messaging tipping point what latest industry research reveals blog
- 2026-09-09Digital financing corridor why trade competitiveness no longer depends blog
- 2026-09-04Islamic banking scale why core systems are now deciding factor blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page finastra.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Finastra
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Finastra is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Finastra is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Trusted, mission-critical software for financial services, designed for reliability and security. Built to fuel your ambition, drive innovation, and accelerate growth.
- For
- banks, lenders, credit unions, and other financial institutions
- Certifications
- certifications
- Hosting
- the US, Canada, UAE, and Singapore
- Customers named
- INGBeacon BankFirst American TrustDearbornTonik BankBNIMaybank
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations
What Finastra's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: finastra.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Finastra's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Finastra, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Finastra by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Finastra is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Finastra, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.