Small business▼−8Since September 2026: 8% → 0%, −8 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 8% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 2 pointsRank 6 → 19 of 77
3 categories · Named, not rankedFinlens
12Judge labels
3First choices
0Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Finlens was named 4 times in Revenue recognition and 2 other categories, where Maxio led with 20%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business19 of 79
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market18 of 77
2%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In revenue recognition · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Finlens for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue recognition | Accounting and close | 2% | 18 of 77 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Maxio at 20% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| AI accounting assistants | Accounting and close | 0% | 44 of 85 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 22% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Financial close management | Accounting and close | 0% | 33 of 85 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 55% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Finlens held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Revenue recognition · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 26 → 35 of 74
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsNot ranked
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue recognition | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 26 → 18 of 77 |
| AI accounting assistants | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 44 of 85, unchanged |
| Financial close manageme | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 33 of 85, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Finlens across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Finlens across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labels2
Comparative3 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained5 labels1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 label1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Finlens is the cheapest functional option: free up to $50k/mo expenses, then $49/mo.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Revenue recognition · budget prompt · first choice
“Finlens's $0/month Starter plan is available for startups under $50k/month in expenses” Claude Haiku 4.5 · AI accounting assistants · budget prompt · alternative
“Finlens (Best for QuickBooks Online Users)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Financial close manageme · budget prompt · alternative
“Move to Finlens if you rely on QuickBooks.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Revenue recognition · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Finlens, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Finlens was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Finlens, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Finlens was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Finlens. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 12 answers that named Finlens and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
finlens.appYour site12
dualentry.com5
guideflow.com5
financial-cents.com4
learn.g2.com4
numeric.io4
pipedrive.com4
thedigitalmerchant.com4
worldmetrics.org4
itechguides.com3
Thirty-seven of the forty-nine domain citations in answers naming Finlens came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
finlens.app is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Finlens takes 2% of first choices and Maxio takes 20%.ShowHide
Search and answers
finlens.app is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Finlens takes 2% of first choices and Maxio takes 20%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “revenue recognition tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “revenue recognition software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 90 a month (“finlens”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 7 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 6,601 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,737 · 19 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 186
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 18 of 77 in revenue recognition
Segment leader
20%
Maxio
- First choices
- 3 across its categories
- Named in
- 12 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 12 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on finlens.app
569
subdomains included
Content
479
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 362 | 77 | 2026-09-16 | Revenue recognition, Accounting software | |
| Comparison | 67 | 15 | 2026-09-12 | Expense management, Revenue recognition | |
| Report or ebook | 35 | 31 | 2026-09-12 | Revenue recognition | |
| Glossary or explainer | 12 | 4 | 2026-09-16 | Expense management | |
| Template or tool | 3 | 0 | 2026-05-20 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-16Break even analysis blog
- 2026-09-16Cash flow management blog
- 2026-09-16Expense reimbursement form blog
- 2026-09-16Financial forecasting blog
- 2026-09-16Franchise accounting blog
- 2026-09-16Nonprofit accounting blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page finlens.app exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Finlens
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Finlens is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Finlens is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Month-end close automation for accounting firms on QuickBooks Online. Automates reconciliation, journal entries, accruals, transaction categorization, and close checklists.
- For
- CPAs and accounting firm partners managing multiple QBO clients.
- Price stated
- Pricing based on the number of clients you manage. Ask us during your demo — we'll build a quote based on your firm's specific needs. finlens.app
- Free plan or trial
- Start Free finlens.app
- Integrations claimed
- 200 finlens.app
- Certifications
- bank-grade encryptionpasswordless authentication
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, hosting, customers
What Finlens's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: finlens.app. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Finlens's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Finlens, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Finlens by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Finlens is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Finlens, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.