Every category where a model named Google Analytics for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
SaaS metrics and analytics	Planning and analysis	0%	77 of 78	80%	10	criticized challenger	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Financial reporting and dashboards	Planning and analysis	0%	86 of 105	50%	2	under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 33%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Google Analytics held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 10 points.

Best category · SaaS metrics · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 51 → 48 of 80

Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 78 → 74 of 75

Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 121 → 93 of 99

All categories · Mid-market

Category	September 2026	Now	Change	Reading	Rank
SaaS metrics	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 78 → 77 of 78
Financial reporting	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 53 → 86 of 105

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Google Analytics across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	1	1	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	2	2
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative8 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative15 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative24 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Google Analytics if web traffic analysis matters more than revenue metrics” MiniMax M2.5 · SaaS metrics · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“"do not use web analytics tools like GA4 as a substitute for product/cohort analytics"” Muse Glimmer 30B · SaaS metrics · negative prompt · hard negative

“Google Analytics should not be used for revenue or subscription metrics” Llama 4 Maverick · SaaS metrics · negative prompt · hard negative

““Use it for web traffic, never for revenue or subscription metrics.”” GLM 4.7 FlashX · SaaS metrics · negative prompt · hard negative

“Should not be used for revenue or subscription metrics” Mistral Small · SaaS metrics · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Google Analytics, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Google Analytics was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

ChartMogul19 of 246Not among the top eight

Mixpanel18 of 243Not among the top eight

Baremetrics17 of 245Not among the top eight

Amplitude17 of 241Not among the top eight

Tableau15 of 240Not among the top eight

ProfitWell Metrics14 of 243Not among the top eight

Heap10 of 240Not among the top eight

Microsoft Power BI10 of 240Not among the top eight

PostHog9 of 241Not among the top eight

Databox9 of 240Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Google Analytics. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 24 of the 24 answers that named Google Analytics and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

baremetrics.com19

designrevision.com15

databox.com11

finance-ai-index.com8

clickup.com6

statsig.com6

swetrix.com6

cometly.com5

g2.com5

linkedin.com5

No domain is on file for Google Analytics, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

baremetrics.com/blog/best-saas-metrics-platforms19

designrevision.com/blog/saas-reporting-tools15

databox.com/best-analytics-tools-saas-companies7

finance-ai-index.com/planning/saas-metrics-and-analytics/smb6

statsig.com/comparison/best-saas-analytics-software6

clickup.com/blog/saas-analytics-tools5

databox.com/10-analytics-tools-that-help-every-team-member-magically-boost-performance5

swetrix.com/blog/analytics-for-saas-startups5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Google Analytics stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 450,000 a month (“google analytics”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 7,722 a month
Its own site: No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 77 of 78 in saas metrics

Segment leader

49%

ChartMogul

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 24 answers
Its own site cited: No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Google Analytics

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Google Analytics; a claim can dispute any of them.

Google Analytics 4 5GA4 1

Follow Google Analytics

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Google Analytics's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Google Analytics, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Google Analytics by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Google Analytics is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Google Analytics, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.