Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 53 → 44 of 46
2 categories · Named, not rankedInvoice Simple
11Judge labels
0First choices
11Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Invoice Simple was named 5 times in Invoicing software and 1 other category, where Zoho Invoice led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business46 of 48
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market70 of 71
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise99 of 111
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In invoicing software · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Invoice Simple for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Invoicing software | Receivables and billing | 0% | 70 of 71 | 100% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Zoho Invoice at 24% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Global e-invoicing compliance | Tax and compliance | 0% | 131 of 136 | 100% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Avalara E-Invoicing at 25% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Invoice Simple held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Invoicing software · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 83 → 64 of 65
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 85 of 96, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Invoicing software | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 83 → 70 of 71 |
| Global e-invoicing compl | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 104 → 131 of 136 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Invoice Simple across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Invoice Simple across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative11 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“The software is difficult to cancel and you have to call. Additionally, there have been outages and customer support takes a long time to respond” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Invoicing software · negative prompt · hard negative
“unexpected price increases and sudden changes to subscription terms that forced additional unexpected payments” Muse Glimmer 30B · Global e-invoicing compl · negative prompt · soft negative
“Invoice Simple has faced a wave of criticism on platforms like Reddit and Trustpilot... steep price hikes” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Invoicing software · negative prompt · soft negative
“Invoice Simple, Invoiced (price hikes and unclear pricing)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Invoicing software · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Invoice Simple, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Invoice Simple was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Invoice Simple, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Invoice Simple was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Invoice Simple. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 11 answers that named Invoice Simple and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
forbes.com10
trustpilot.com8
capterra.com7
quickbooks.intuit.com5
g2.com4
geekflare.com4
linkedin.com4
nerdwallet.com4
reddit.com4
fitsmallbusiness.com3
Fifty-three of the fifty-three domain citations in answers naming Invoice Simple came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on e-invoice.be
221
subdomains included
Content
78
counted in the table below
Documentation
52
Product · Integration
12 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 55 | 0 | 2025-01-06 | ||
| Report or ebook | 8 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 8 | 0 | 2025-01-06 | ||
| Template or tool | 4 | 0 | 2025-01-06 | ||
| Case study | 2 | 0 | 2026-06-04 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | 0 | 2025-01-06 |
Most recent
- 2026-06-04Eventify case study
- 2026-06-04Pixl creations case study
- 2025-01-06Late payment calculator be template or tool
- 2025-01-06Late payment calculator nl template or tool
- 2025-01-06Late payment calculator de template or tool
- 2025-01-06Late payment calculator fr template or tool
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page e-invoice.be exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Invoice Simple
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Invoice Simple is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Invoice Simple is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Certifications
- Certified Peppol Access Point
- Hosting
- EuropeWorldwide
- Customers named
- Mogas
- Not stated on the pages read
- Positioning, who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations
What Invoice Simple's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: e-invoice.be, e-invoice.be/pricing, e-invoice.be/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Invoice Simple's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Invoice Simple, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Invoice Simple by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Invoice Simple is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Invoice Simple, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.