Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 52 → 13 of 46
2 categories · RankedInvoicely
20Judge labels
0First choices
16Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Invoicing software for mid-market buyers
Rank 71 of 71 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 88% of its 8 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business13 of 48
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market71 of 71
0%8 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise101 of 111
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In invoicing software · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Invoicely for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Invoicing software | Receivables and billing | 0% | 71 of 71 | 88% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by Zoho Invoice at 24% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Global e-invoicing compliance | Tax and compliance | 0% | 136 of 136 | 100% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Avalara E-Invoicing at 25% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Invoicely held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Invoicing software · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 84 → 65 of 65
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 87 of 96, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Invoicing software | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 84 → 71 of 71 |
| Global e-invoicing compl | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 96 → 136 of 136 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Invoicely across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Invoicely across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative15 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative20 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“You need a simple invoicing tool at a very low price point.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Invoicing software · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“A publicly exposed database belonging to Invoicely was discovered in early October, exposing files ... of sensitive personal and financial information” Muse Glimmer 30B · Invoicing software · negative prompt · hard negative
“User support lock-outs and data access issues... an unencrypted and non-password-protected database that contained nearly 180k files.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Global e-invoicing compl · negative prompt · hard negative
“Platforms like Invoicely have faced a growing number of complaints ... entirely non-existent customer support.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Invoicing software · negative prompt · hard negative
“Smaller tools like Invoicely present risks around reliability and support quality.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Invoicing software · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Invoicely, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Invoicely was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Invoicely, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Invoicely was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Invoicely. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 20 of the 20 answers that named Invoicely and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
forbes.com12
capterra.com9
trustpilot.com8
nerdwallet.com7
reddit.com7
agiled.app5
medium.com5
swydo.com5
techradar.com5
avalara.com4
Sixty-seven of the sixty-seven domain citations in answers naming Invoicely came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
invoicely.com ranks 9 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Invoicely takes 0% of first choices and Zoho Invoice takes 24%.ShowHide
Search and answers
invoicely.com ranks 9 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Invoicely takes 0% of first choices and Zoho Invoice takes 24%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “invoicing tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “invoicing software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 2,400 a month (“invoicely”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 36,685 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 51,812 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,981 · 194 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,333
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 71 of 71 in invoicing software
Segment leader
24%
Zoho Invoice
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 20 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 20 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on invoicely.com
192
subdomains included
Content
136
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
6 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 133 | 0 | 2021-12-24 | Invoicing software | |
| Comparison | 2 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2021-12-24Invoicely software advice frontrunner 2021 blog
- 2021-11-19How to send an invoice to more than one person with invoicely blog
- 2021-10-23How to add a late payment fee to your invoice with invoicely blog
- 2021-09-10How to export invoices from invoicely blog
- 2021-08-06Nvoicely in software advices frontrunners for recurring billing software blog
- 2021-07-16How to write a bill in the invoicely app blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page invoicely.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Invoicely
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Invoicely is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Invoicely is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Free, Unlimited Invoicing For Your Business
- For
- small businesses
- Price stated
- free invoicely.com
- Starting price
- 0.00 invoicely.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Start using for free invoicely.com
- Customers named
- Coca Cola, Inc.Example, Inc.Jon ReeseKim GeorgeJon FarmerKristi BeiseckerRoy TaylorRahu Saigal
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, certifications, hosting
What Invoicely's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: invoicely.com, invoicely.com/pricing, trust.invoicely.com, invoicely.com/features/track, invoicely.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Invoicely's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Invoicely, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Invoicely by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Invoicely is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Invoicely, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.