Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 41 of 46, unchanged
7 categories · RankedInvoiced
77Judge labels
8First choices
12Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
7Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
10% in Invoicing software for mid-market buyers
Rank 5 of 71 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
4 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 13% of its 15 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Invoiced →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business43 of 48
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market5 of 71
10%15 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise14 of 111
2%6 labels
under the label threshold
In invoicing software · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Invoiced for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Invoicing software | Receivables and billing | 10% | 5 of 71 | 13% | 15 | accepted challenger | ▼−5Since September 2026: 14% → 9%, −5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Accounts receivable automation | Receivables and billing | 0% | 21 of 79 | 14% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Upflow at 17% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| B2B payment acceptance | Receivables and billing | 0% | 20 of 94 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Versapay at 19% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Global e-invoicing compliance | Tax and compliance | 0% | 135 of 136 | 100% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Avalara E-Invoicing at 25% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Accounts payable automation | Spend and procurement | 0% | 29 of 54 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Ramp at 22% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| B2B BNPL and net terms | Receivables and billing | 0% | 36 of 90 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Resolve Pay at 56% | |
| Cash application | Receivables and billing | 0% | 56 of 83 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Versapay at 9% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Invoiced held within the floor in all seven categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Invoicing software · by segment
Mid-market▼−5Since September 2026: 14% → 9%, −5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
9%from 14% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 5 pointsRank 4 → 6 of 65
Enterprise▲+3Since September 2026: 0% → 3%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
3%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 70 → 13 of 96
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Invoicing software | 14% | 9% | ▼−5Since September 2026: 14% → 9%, −5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 4 → 5 of 71 |
| Accounts receivable auto | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 20 → 21 of 79 |
| B2B payment acceptance | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 30 → 20 of 94 |
| Global e-invoicing compl | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 107 → 135 of 136 |
| Accounts payable automat | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 30 → 29 of 54 |
| B2B BNPL and terms | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 36 of 90, unchanged |
| Cash application | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 36 → 56 of 83 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Invoiced across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Invoiced across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct26 labels4
Paraphrase17 labels4
Comparative12 labels3not counted in share
Budget-constrained5 labelsNone
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative13 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative77 labels in all, every segment counted; 8 of the 12 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I would recommend Invoiced if your priority is B2B invoice management... Invoiced is the strongest fit for a mid-sized B2B company.” Perplexity Sonar · Invoicing software · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Invoiced is the classic mid-market/enterprise pick for recurring billing, dunning and e-invoicing compliance” Muse Glimmer 30B · Invoicing software · direct prompt · first choice
“Billtrust (for large scale) or Invoiced (for agility and ease of use)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Invoicing software · direct prompt · first choice
“BILL and Invoiced are the top recommendations” Mistral Small · Invoicing software · direct prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“notable complaints include sudden steep price hikes... Some long-term users call it a "scam" due to billing practices.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Global e-invoicing compl · negative prompt · hard negative
“Invoiced (deteriorating support, unclear pricing, abrupt account cancellations)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Invoicing software · negative prompt · hard negative
“Invoiced ⛔ - Massive unexpected price hikes” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Global e-invoicing compl · negative prompt · hard negative
“Tools like Sage AR Automation (Lockstep) and Invoiced are generally well-rated, but user complaints frequently highlight frustration around limited merchant processing choices” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Accounts receivable auto · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Invoiced, over the 77 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Invoiced was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Invoiced, over the 77 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Invoiced was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Invoiced. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 75 of the 77 answers that named Invoiced and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
g2.com32
chaserhq.com28
learn.g2.com28
highradius.com26
bill.com21
forbes.com21
upflow.io21
gitnux.org20
worldmetrics.org20
zenskar.com19
236 of the 236 domain citations in answers naming Invoiced came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
invoiced.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Invoiced takes 10% of first choices and Zoho Invoice takes 24%.ShowHide
Search and answers
invoiced.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Invoiced takes 10% of first choices and Zoho Invoice takes 24%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “invoicing tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “invoicing software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 110,000 a month (“invoiced”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 36,685 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 46,626 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 4,860 · 106 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,928
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
10%
rank 5 of 71 in invoicing software
Segment leader
24%
Zoho Invoice
- First choices
- 8 across its categories
- Named in
- 77 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 75 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on invoiced.com
416
subdomains included
Content
270
counted in the table below
Documentation
90
Product · Integration
16 · 8
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 184 | 10 | 2026-09-28 | Accounts receivable auto, Account reconciliation | |
| Glossary or explainer | 20 | 0 | 2025-06-17 | Cash application | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 18 | 2 | 2026-08-31 | ||
| Report or ebook | 14 | 1 | 2026-09-25 | B2B payment acceptance, Accounts receivable auto | |
| Comparison | 12 | 3 | 2026-08-27 | ||
| Case study | 9 | 1 | 2026-08-19 | ||
| Podcast or video | 8 | 0 | 2024-07-15 | ||
| Template or tool | 4 | 1 | 2026-07-15 | ||
| Conference or event | 1 | 0 | 2026-04-03 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Invoiced by flywire named a leader in the 2026 nucleus research accounts receivable technology value matrix blog
- 2026-09-25Top accounts receivable automation software blog
- 2026-09-25Invoiced named a leader in accounts receivable technology report or ebook
- 2026-09-16Schedule demo 25 min blog
- 2026-09-08Reimagining accounts receivable how integration closes the gap blog
- 2026-09-08Embedded payments for dynamics 365 scaling a r globally blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page invoiced.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Invoiced
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Invoiced; a claim can dispute any of them.
Invoiced by Flywire 4InvoiceFly / Invoiced 1Invoiced (by Flywire) 1Invoiced (invoiced.com) 1
Follow Invoiced
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Invoiced is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Invoiced is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Award-winning, comprehensive AR automation software that's easy to set up, lowers DSO, and gets you paid faster with 45% fewer inquiries.
- For
- B2B finance teams; upper-mid-market and enterprise B2B finance teams
- Integrations claimed
- 1000 invoiced.com
- Certifications
- PCI DSS Level 1SOC 2GDPR
- Customers named
- KnowBe4iWaveWebPTButcher ShoppePinnacle ServicesAJ TutoringImmigrant Law GroupJumpCrew
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, hosting
What Invoiced's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: invoiced.com, invoiced.com/accounts-receivable/pricing, invoiced.com/solutions/use-cases, invoiced.com/resources/customers, invoiced.com/accounts-receivable/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Invoiced's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Invoiced, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Invoiced by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Invoiced is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Invoiced, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.