Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 46 of 46, unchanged
2 categories · Named, not rankedInvoicera
10Judge labels
1First choices
6Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Invoicera was named 4 times in Invoicing software and 1 other category, where Zoho Invoice led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business47 of 48
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market68 of 71
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise17 of 111
2%2 labels
under the label threshold
In invoicing software · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Invoicera for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Invoicing software | Receivables and billing | 0% | 68 of 71 | 67% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Zoho Invoice at 24% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Global e-invoicing compliance | Tax and compliance | 0% | 70 of 136 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Avalara E-Invoicing at 25% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Invoicera held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Invoicing software · by segment
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 62 of 65, unchanged
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 45 of 96, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Invoicing software | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 68 of 71, unchanged |
| Global e-invoicing compl | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 70 of 136, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Invoicera across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Invoicera across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained2 labels1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Invoicera at $9.95/month or Xero at $29/month offer better regulatory compliance coverage” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Global e-invoicing compl · budget prompt · alternative
“If you operate globally → Invoicera or Zoho Invoice (multi-currency).” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Invoicing software · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“isn't as developed as it could be, with limited time tracking and reporting and no live bank feeds... bad customer service” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Invoicing software · negative prompt · hard negative
“Criticized for basic customization options, occasional interface quirks, and apps that lack refinement.” Mistral Small · Invoicing software · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Invoicera, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Invoicera was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Invoicera, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Invoicera was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Invoicera. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 10 answers that named Invoicera and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
forbes.com8
capterra.com4
fitsmallbusiness.com4
g2.com4
geekflare.com3
nerdwallet.com3
quickbooks.intuit.com3
techradar.com3
agiled.app2
bill.com2
Thirty-six of the thirty-six domain citations in answers naming Invoicera came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on invoicera.com
462
subdomains included
Content
103
counted in the table below
Documentation
264
Product · Integration
16 · 5
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 35 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 30 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 20 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 15 | undated | Invoicing software | ||
| Report or ebook | 3 | undated |
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page invoicera.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.
Follow Invoicera
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Invoicera is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Invoicera is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The billing operations platform for businesses that have outgrown simple invoicing.
- For
- finance, billing-operations and accounts-receivable teams whose invoices vary by customer, contract, project, usage or legal entity
- Price stated
- Operate, Grow and Scale have published prices, per organisation rather than per person; Enterprise is custom. Annual billing is shown first as a monthly equivalent with the full annual total; monthly billing remains available at the disclosed monthly rate. invoicera.com/pricing
- Starting price
- 50 invoicera.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- 7-day free trial, no card needed. invoicera.com
- Certifications
- ISO 9001:2015ISO/IEC 27001CMMI Level 3
- Customers named
- HumigyJacob DavisCyrel HaywardJoel Fernandez
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, hosting
What Invoicera's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: invoicera.com, invoicera.com, invoicera.com/pricing, invoicera.com/trust, invoicera.com/product. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Invoicera's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Invoicera, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Invoicera by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Invoicera is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Invoicera, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.