Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 14 → 73 of 106
1 category · Named, not rankedInvopop
10Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Invopop was named 6 times in Global e-invoicing compl, where Avalara E-Invoicing led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business79 of 114
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market28 of 136
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise25 of 90
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
In global e-invoicing compl · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Invopop for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global e-invoicing compliance | Tax and compliance | 0% | 28 of 136 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Avalara E-Invoicing at 25% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Invopop held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Global e-invoicing compl · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 51 → 25 of 116
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 21 of 87, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global e-invoicing compl | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 51 → 28 of 136 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Invopop across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Invopop across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative6 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you are a software company selling globally, you likely need Invopop to automate tax reporting in 20+ jurisdictions simultaneously.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Global e-invoicing compl · comparative prompt · first choice
“Invopop - API-driven for SaaS/global reporting.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Global e-invoicing compl · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Invopop, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Invopop was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Invopop, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Invopop was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Invopop. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 10 answers that named Invopop and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
taxtech500.com10
pfadvice.com5
sourceforge.net5
basware.com4
forbes.com4
mindsprint.com4
gitnux.org3
programmersolutions.com3
thedigitalprojectmanager.com3
truecommerce.com3
Forty-four of the forty-four domain citations in answers naming Invopop came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
invopop.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Invopop takes 0% of first choices and Avalara E-Invoicing takes 25%.ShowHide
Search and answers
invopop.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Invopop takes 0% of first choices and Avalara E-Invoicing takes 25%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “e-invoicing platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “e-invoicing compliance platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 70 a month (“invopop”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 828 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 321 · 0 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 756
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 28 of 136 in global e-invoicing compl
Segment leader
25%
Avalara E-Invoicing
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 10 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 10 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on invopop.com
1,077
subdomains included
Content
116
counted in the table below
Documentation
238
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Report or ebook | 77 | undated | |||
| Blog | 27 | 2 | 2026-08-31 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 6 | undated | |||
| Case study | 5 | 2 | 2026-09-22 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-22Payhawk case study
- 2026-09-22Mews case study
- 2026-08-31E invoicing in france rules deadlines and penalties blog
- 2026-07-30New pricing 2026 blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page invopop.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Invopop
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Invopop is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Invopop is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The invoicing infrastructure for global businesses
- For
- global businesses
- Price stated
- Dev 0€ / month; Pro 500€ / month; Enterprise Custom invopop.com/pricing
- Starting price
- 0€ / month invopop.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Dev 0€ / month invopop.com/pricing
- Certifications
- GDPRISO 27001ISO 27001:2022ISO 27001 certification
- Customers named
- PayhawkMewsPayflowAmenitizSundayNovutechChargebee
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, hosting
What Invopop's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: invopop.com, invopop.com/pricing, trust.invopop.com, invopop.com/customers, invopop.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Invopop's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Invopop, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Invopop by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Invopop is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Invopop, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.