Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 85 of 88, unchanged
5 categories · Named, not rankedJira
9Judge labels
0First choices
8Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
5Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Jira was named 6 times in Internal controls and 4 other categories, where FloQast led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market87 of 90
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In internal controls · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Jira for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal controls and SOX | Tax and compliance | 0% | 87 of 90 | 100% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 25% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Board and investor reporting | Planning and analysis | 0% | 89 of 99 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by OnBoard at 26% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Corporate performance management | Planning and analysis | 0% | 60 of 99 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Planful at 22% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Financial close management | Accounting and close | 0% | 81 of 85 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 55% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Professional services automation | Receivables and billing | 0% | 95 of 99 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by BigTime at 29% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Jira held within the floor in all five categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Internal controls · by segment
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsNot ranked
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal controls | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 87 of 90, unchanged |
| Board | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 89 of 99, unchanged |
| Corporate performance ma | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 41 → 60 of 99 |
| Financial close manageme | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 81 of 85, unchanged |
| PSA | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 95 of 99, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Jira across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Jira across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative8 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Project Management Tools (e.g., Jira, Asana, Trello) These are popular but fundamentally misaligned with board reporting.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Board · negative prompt · hard negative
“You should avoid relying on these for true PSA needs unless you have zero budget.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · PSA · negative prompt · hard negative
“Examples to avoid: Asana, Monday.com, Trello, Jira” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Financial close manageme · negative prompt · hard negative
“these tools are not built with compliance in mind. They lack essential control mechanisms” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Internal controls · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Jira, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Jira was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Jira, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Jira was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Jira. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 9 answers that named Jira and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
g2.com5
ones.com4
capterra.com3
celoxis.com3
linkedin.com3
wrike.com3
acronis.com2
appdeck.com2
bluecopa.com2
boardintelligence.com2
Twenty-nine of the twenty-nine domain citations in answers naming Jira came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
atlassian.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Jira takes 0% of first choices and FloQast takes 25%.ShowHide
Search and answers
atlassian.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Jira takes 0% of first choices and FloQast takes 25%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “internal controls tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “sox compliance software”
–
not in the top ten
- Organic visits to its site
- about 4,724,388 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 192,288 · 33,627 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 137,840
- Paid Google search
- 33 searches its ads show for, about 356 clicks and $5,906 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 87 of 90 in internal controls
Segment leader
25%
FloQast
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 9 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 8 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on atlassian.com
39,569
subdomains included
Content
6,074
counted in the table below
Documentation
8,766
Product · Integration
107 · 65
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 4,124 | 18 | 2026-09-28 | Financial modeling, Financial reporting | |
| Glossary or explainer | 784 | 0 | 2026-04-09 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 326 | 0 | 2016-08-11 | ||
| Template or tool | 292 | 0 | 2025-08-18 | ||
| Report or ebook | 249 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 118 | 2 | 2026-09-11 | ||
| Case study | 89 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 70 | 5 | 2026-10-15 | ||
| Podcast or video | 14 | 4 | 2026-09-16 | ||
| News or press | 8 | 0 | 2022-03-03 |
Most recent
- 2026-10-15Atlassian san francisco bay area presents build ai agents zero code amp get the inside scoop on team 26 europe conference or event
- 2026-09-30Atlassian pasadena presents ai at the speed of live how to lead your digital ensemble conference or event
- 2026-09-29Atlassian boise presents get credentialed rovo fundamentals conference or event
- 2026-09-28Hidden cost manual alignment blog
- 2026-09-28Four gaps strategy outcome blog
- 2026-09-28Strategy shifts organization follow blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page atlassian.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Jira
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Jira is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Jira is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Jira is the #1 agile project management tool used by teams to plan, track, release and support great software.
- For
- teams
- Price stated
- Free, Standard, Premium, Enterprise atlassian.com/software/jira/pricing
- Starting price
- 0 atlassian.com/software/jira/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Free forever for 10 users atlassian.com/software/jira/pricing
- Integrations claimed
- 3000 atlassian.com/software/jira/pricing
- Hosting
- Multi-region data residency
- Not stated on the pages read
- Certifications, customers
What Jira's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: atlassian.com, atlassian.com/software/jira/pricing, trust.atlassian.com, atlassian.com/platform, atlassian.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Jira's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Jira, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Jira by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Jira is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Jira, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.