Small businessgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsNot ranked
Trello
24Judge labels
0First choices
13Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
6Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
8 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Trello was named 8 times in Internal controls and 5 other categories, where FloQast led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market89 of 90
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In internal controls · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Trello for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal controls and SOX | Tax and compliance | 0% | 89 of 90 | 100% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 25% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Professional services automation | Receivables and billing | 0% | 92 of 99 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by BigTime at 29% | |
| Board and investor reporting | Planning and analysis | 0% | 92 of 99 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by OnBoard at 26% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Corporate performance management | Planning and analysis | 0% | 73 of 99 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Planful at 22% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Entity management | Equity and corporate | 0% | 74 of 81 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Athennian at 41% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Financial close management | Accounting and close | 0% | 83 of 85 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 55% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Trello held within the floor in all six categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Internal controls · by segment
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 87 of 88, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal controls | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 89 of 90, unchanged |
| PSA | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 92 of 99, unchanged |
| Board | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 92 of 99, unchanged |
| Corporate performance ma | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 73 of 99, unchanged |
| Entity management | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 74 of 81, unchanged |
| Financial close manageme | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 83 of 85, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Trello across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Trello across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative5 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative10 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative24 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Project Management Tools (e.g., Jira, Asana, Trello) These are popular but fundamentally misaligned with board reporting.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Board · negative prompt · hard negative
“Tools like Asana, Trello, or Monday.com are often marketed for "Legal Ops," but they are generic project managers.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Entity management · negative prompt · hard negative
“You should avoid relying on these for true PSA needs unless you have zero budget.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · PSA · negative prompt · hard negative
“Examples to avoid: Asana, Monday.com, Trello, Jira” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Financial close manageme · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Trello, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Trello was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Trello, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Trello was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Trello. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 19 of the 24 answers that named Trello and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
g2.com6
numeric.io6
capterra.com5
guideflow.com5
bluecopa.com4
clearpointstrategy.com4
gitnux.org4
softwareadvice.com4
thedigitalprojectmanager.com4
worldmetrics.org4
No domain is on file for Trello, so its own site is not marked.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where Trello stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where Trello stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 246,000 a month (“trello”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 4,827 a month
- Its own site
- No site of its own on file, so no site figures
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 89 of 90 in internal controls
Segment leader
25%
FloQast
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 24 answers
- Its own site cited
- No site on file to match
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Follow Trello
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Trello's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Trello, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Trello by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Trello is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Trello, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.