Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 94 of 158, unchanged
Workday · 2 categories · RankedWorkday Strategic Sourcing
28Judge labels
4First choices
2Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Strategic sourcing for enterprise buyers
Rank 7 of 128 in the mid-market standing
2 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 12% of its 8 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business99 of 166
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market7 of 128
6%8 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise6 of 77
2%15 labels
accepted challenger
In strategic sourcing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Workday Strategic Sourcing for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strategic sourcing | Spend and procurement | 6% | 7 of 128 | 12% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by oboloo at 15% | ▼−4Since September 2026: 9% → 5%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Spend management platforms | Spend and procurement | 0% | 37 of 46 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Ramp at 44% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Workday Strategic Sourcing held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Strategic sourcing · by segment
Mid-market▼−4Since September 2026: 9% → 5%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
5%from 9% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 5 → 10 of 120
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 8 → 6 of 63
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strategic sourcing | 9% | 5% | ▼−4Since September 2026: 9% → 5%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 5 → 7 of 128 |
| Spend management platfor | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 37 of 46, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Workday Strategic Sourcing across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Workday Strategic Sourcing across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct10 labels2
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative6 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labels1
Scale-constrained6 labels1
Negative1 label1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative28 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Known for incredibly high user adoption and an intuitive interface. It is excellent for running RFPs and managing pipelines” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Strategic sourcing · scale prompt · first choice
“Best for: Overall ease-of-use and collaborative team RFPs... remains a top-tier choice for mid-market companies” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Strategic sourcing · direct prompt · first choice
“I'd start with Workday Strategic Sourcing” GPT-6 Luna · Strategic sourcing · direct prompt · first choice
“best suited to mid-market and enterprise organizations, particularly those already running Workday Financials” Muse Glimmer 30B · Strategic sourcing · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Enterprise tools like Workday Strategic Sourcing or Sourcing Acumen are powerful but often require consultants.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Strategic sourcing · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Workday Strategic Sourcing, over the 28 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Workday Strategic Sourcing was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Workday Strategic Sourcing, over the 28 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Workday Strategic Sourcing was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Workday Strategic Sourcing. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 28 of the 28 answers that named Workday Strategic Sourcing and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
g2.com15
spendflo.com15
gartner.com11
softwareconnect.com11
suplari.com11
f6s.com8
mindsprint.com8
guideflow.com7
softwareadvice.com7
softwaresuggest.com7
100 of the 100 domain citations in answers naming Workday Strategic Sourcing came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where Workday Strategic Sourcing stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where Workday Strategic Sourcing stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 480 a month (“workday strategic sourcing”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 5 a month
- Its own site
- It sits on Workday's site (workday.com), so there are no site figures for it alone
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
6%
rank 7 of 128 in strategic sourcing
Segment leader
15%
oboloo
- First choices
- 4 across its categories
- Named in
- 28 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 28 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Workday Strategic Sourcing
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Workday Strategic Sourcing; a claim can dispute any of them.
Workday Strategic Sourcing (formerly Scout RFP) 1
Follow Workday Strategic Sourcing
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Workday is the company behind Workday Strategic Sourcing.ShowHide
The company
Workday is the company behind Workday Strategic Sourcing.
ShowHideOn record
Company records- Also from Workday
- Workday Accounting Agent, Workday Adaptive, Workday Adaptive Planning, Workday Financial Management, Workday Financials, Workday P2P, Workday P2P/T&E, Workday PSA and 8 more
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Les technologies de sourcing digital deviendront plus essentielles au succès de l'entreprise à mesure de l'évolution vers un environnement de travail hybride.
- For
- les équipes de sourcing stratégique et de gestion des achats
- Customers named
- Hyland SoftwareRalph Lauren
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Workday Strategic Sourcing's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: workday.com/fr-fr/topics/finance/strategic-sourcing.html, workday.com/ja-jp/topics/finance/what-is-strategic-sourcing.html, workday.com/nl-nl/products/spend-management/strategic-sourcing.html, workday.com/fr-fr/products/spend-management/strategic-sourcing.html, workday.com/es-es/products/spend-management/strategic-sourcing.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Workday Strategic Sourcing's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Workday Strategic Sourcing, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Workday Strategic Sourcing by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Workday Strategic Sourcing is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Workday Strategic Sourcing, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.