Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 11 → 65 of 96
1 category · Named, not rankedLucanet
17Judge labels
0First choices
3Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Lucanet was named 5 times in Financial consolidation, where Prophix led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business69 of 100
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market24 of 102
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise28 of 82
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In financial consolidation · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Lucanet for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial consolidation | Accounting and close | 0% | 24 of 102 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Prophix at 24% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Lucanet held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Financial consolidation · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 18 → 24 of 99
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 28 → 27 of 75
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial consolidation | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 18 → 24 of 102 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Lucanet across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Lucanet across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative4 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative8 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“look at tools built specifically to solve close management and consolidation (e.g., Lucanet, Fluence Technologies, or Numeric” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Financial consolidation · scale prompt · alternative
“A purpose-built, "finance-owned" consolidation tool that operates on pre-configured, out-of-the-box consolidation rules.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Financial consolidation · comparative prompt · alternative
“the gold standard for statutory financial consolidation, compliance, and audit readiness” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Financial consolidation · direct prompt · alternative
“include Lucanet in a group-accounting-focused evaluation” GPT-6 Luna · Financial consolidation · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Lucanet, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Lucanet was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Lucanet, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Lucanet was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Lucanet. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 17 answers that named Lucanet and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
prophix.com9
numeric.io7
cfoshortlist.com5
highradius.com5
joiin.co5
onestream.com5
worldmetrics.org5
aicostadvisory.com4
bluecopa.com4
dokka.com4
Fifty-three of the fifty-three domain citations in answers naming Lucanet came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
lucanet.com ranks 7 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Lucanet takes 0% of first choices and Prophix takes 24%.ShowHide
Search and answers
lucanet.com ranks 7 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Lucanet takes 0% of first choices and Prophix takes 24%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “consolidation tools”
7
Position for “financial consolidation software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 390 a month (“lucanet”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 8 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 342 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 248 · 9 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,674
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 24 of 102 in financial consolidation
Segment leader
24%
Prophix
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 17 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 17 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on lucanet.com
2,532
subdomains included
Content
379
counted in the table below
Documentation
752
Product · Integration
33 · 3
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 163 | 12 | 2026-09-23 | ESG and carbon reporting, Accounting software | |
| Case study | 68 | undated | Financial consolidation | ||
| Report or ebook | 67 | undated | Financial consolidation, Accounting software | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 48 | 0 | 2025-12-02 | Financial consolidation | |
| News or press | 18 | 1 | 2026-08-11 | ||
| Podcast or video | 7 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 3 | undated | Lease accounting | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 2 | 0 | 2025-11-12 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-23Sustainability reporting standard for voluntary use explained blog
- 2026-09-09Finance tool for exit readiness blog
- 2026-09-08Understanding different types of xbrl reports blog
- 2026-09-03Global accounting standards comparison ifrs us gaap blog
- 2026-09-02Intelligence inside 9 automation intelligence redefining budget season blog
- 2026-08-20Modeler agent xpa blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page lucanet.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Lucanet
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Lucanet; a claim can dispute any of them.
LucaNet 3
Follow Lucanet
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Lucanet is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Lucanet is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The CFO Solution Platform with intelligence built in
- For
- finance and tax teams around the world
- Price stated
- Pricing lucanet.com/en/platform
- Integrations claimed
- 300 lucanet.com
- Certifications
- independently certified across international and German regulatory standardsISM system – ISO/IEC 27001: IS 714969ISMS Cloud Security – ISO/IEC 27017: Certificate No. CLOUD 776088PII processors – ISO/IEC 27018: Certificate No. PII 776089SSAE 18 SOC 1 TYPE 2ISAE 3402 SOC 1 TYPE 2IDW PS 951 n.F. SOC I TYPE BSSAE 18 SOC 2 TYPE 1
- Hosting
- your region
- Customers named
- Hannover ReHotelatelierBlochLeicaMylight150Bordeaux Metropole EnergiesDoppelmayrVAUDE
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial
What Lucanet's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: lucanet.com, trust.lucanet.com, lucanet.com/en/platform, lucanet.com/fr/customers, lucanet.com/en/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Lucanet's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Lucanet, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Lucanet by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Lucanet is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Lucanet, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.