Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 8 → 12 of 82
4 categories · Named, not rankedLunos
24Judge labels
6First choices
1Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
4Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
9 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Lunos was named 9 times in Cash application and 3 other categories, where Versapay led with 9%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business12 of 88
2%9 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market10 of 83
4%5 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise53 of 62
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In cash application · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Lunos for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash application | Receivables and billing | 4% | 10 of 83 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Versapay at 9% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 7% → 5%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Cash flow forecasting | Treasury and cash | 2% | 18 of 101 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Agicap at 13% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. |
| Accounts receivable automation | Receivables and billing | 0% | 66 of 79 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Upflow at 17% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Chargeback management | Receivables and billing | 0% | 50 of 81 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Chargeflow at 24% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Lunos held within the floor in all four categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Cash application · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 7% → 5%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
5%from 7% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 5 → 9 of 79
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 22 → 47 of 58
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash flow forecasting | 0% | 2% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. | New this edition | Rank 18 of 101, unchanged |
| Cash application | 7% | 5% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 7% → 5%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 5 → 10 of 83 |
| Accounts receivable auto | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 28 → 66 of 79 |
| Chargeback management | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 50 of 81, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Lunos across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Lunos across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase4 labels2
Comparative7 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained12 labels4
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative24 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Why I'd pick HighRadius (or Lunos) for a typical mid‑sized B2B company” MiniMax M2.5 · Cash application · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“start with free tools (Excel, Wave, Cash Flow Frog, or Lunos)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Cash flow forecasting · budget prompt · first choice
“Lunos (free tier) is the lowest-risk entry point” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Cash application · budget prompt · first choice
“Close Second: Lunos (if you want AI-first automation)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Chargeback management · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Lunos, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Lunos was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Lunos, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Lunos was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Lunos. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 24 of the 24 answers that named Lunos and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
lunos.aiYour site21
chaserhq.com14
bluecopa.com11
highradius.com10
cashbook.com9
remitclear.com9
stuut.ai9
itechguides.com8
thecfoclub.com8
cashflowpick.com7
Eighty-five of the 106 domain citations in answers naming Lunos came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
lunos.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Lunos takes 4% of first choices and Versapay takes 9%.ShowHide
Search and answers
lunos.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Lunos takes 4% of first choices and Versapay takes 9%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “cash application tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “cash application software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,000 a month (“lunos”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 488 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 162 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 161 · 2 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 251
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess1 ads · 1 text · 1 shown in the last 30 days
First shown September 2025, as Lunos, verified.
On Google's pages: 1
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
4%
rank 10 of 83 in cash application
Segment leader
9%
Versapay
- First choices
- 6 across its categories
- Named in
- 24 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 24 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on lunos.ai
56
subdomains included
Content
36
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 24 | 0 | 2026-06-02 | Cash application | |
| Comparison | 12 | 0 | 2026-06-02 |
Most recent
- 2026-06-02Coupa supplier portal invoice submission blog
- 2026-06-02Versapay alternatives comparison
- 2026-06-01Best upflow alternatives comparison
- 2026-04-01Accounts receivable dispute resolution guide blog
- 2026-04-01Best accounts receivable collections software blog
- 2026-04-01Best automated payment reconciliation software blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page lunos.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Lunos
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Lunos; a claim can dispute any of them.
Lunos AI 1
Follow Lunos
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Lunos is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Lunos is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI partner for receivables, handling collections, portal uploads, cash app & more
- For
- Built for the whole finance team – from AR specialists to the CFO
- Price stated
- The Lunos fee applies only once the invoice has been collected from your customer and is marked as paid. We will invoice you in aggregate. lunos.ai
- Starting price
- 0 lunos.ai
- Free plan or trial
- Start for free lunos.ai
- Integrations claimed
- 6 lunos.ai
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type II attested
- Customers named
- ServiceUpRevelaSwapSwap CommerceGEV Tehnologies
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What Lunos's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: lunos.ai, lunos.ai/pricing, trust.lunos.ai, lunos.ai/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Lunos's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Lunos, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Lunos by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Lunos is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Lunos, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.